Technical Papers
Jul 19, 2017

Resilient Bridge Rocking Columns with Polyurethane Damage-Resistant End Segments and Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Links

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 10

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel low-damage bridge column design for accelerated bridge construction (ABC) in seismic areas. The proposed design integrates (1) polyurethane (PU) damage-resistant segments at the column ends to accommodate large rotations without damage, (2) external replaceable energy-dissipating (ED) links to provide supplemental hysteretic damping and flexural stiffness and strength, and (3) internal unbonded posttensioning to provide self-centering. Polyurethanes are polymeric materials that exhibit large deformability, low stiffness, and large strength, in addition to rate-dependent elastic and inelastic mechanical properties. As a result, PUs can accommodate large deformations with negligible damage. The ED links are external buckling-restrained yielding steel elements, which offer additional stiffness/strength and hysteretic energy dissipation to control seismic-displacement demands. Following strong earthquakes, residual deformations are small and can be fully eliminated upon replacement of the (external) ED links, which are the only elements to experience major damage. Because all ED links are external, replacement can be rapidly performed without operation disruptions. The mechanical properties of a selected PU were first investigated through uniaxial compression tests for various strain rates. The proposed column design was then investigated for various PU-segment geometries and various ED-link properties through three-dimensional finite-element analysis of a bridge column subjected to monotonic and cyclic pushover loading at various loading rates and amplitudes. The proposed column design was found to provide major self-centering and energy-dissipation capabilities with negligible damage. The response was found to be dependent on the geometric properties of the PU segments. Residual deformations significantly decreased with the loading rate. However, the peak column strength only slightly increased with the loading rate.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge BASF, particularly Mr. Patrick Webster and Mrs. Staci Wegener, for donating polyurethane solutions and for providing guidance in the specimen preparation.

References

Abaqus 6.13 [Computer software]. SIMULIA, Providence, RI.
Arruda, E. M., and Boyce, M. C. (1993). “A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 41(2), 389–412.
ASTM. (2010). “Standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics.” D695-10, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2015). “Standard specification for high-strength low-alloy columbium-vanadium structural steel.” A572-15, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2016). “Standard specification for low-alloy steel deformed and plain bars for concrete reinforcement.” A706-16, West Conshohocken, PA.
BASF. (2016). “1st quarter 2017 results published.” 〈https://www.basf.com/us/en.html〉 (Feb. 1, 2014).
Bergström, J. S., and Bischoff, J. E. (2010). “An advanced thermomechanical constitutive model for UHMWPE.” Int. J. Struct. Changes Solids, 2(1), 31–39.
Bergström, J. S., and Boyce, M. C. (1998). “Constitutive modeling of the large strain time-dependent behavior of elastomers.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 46(5), 931–954.
Bergström, J. S., and Boyce, M. C. (1999). “Mechanical behavior of particle filled elastomers.” Rubber Chem. Technol., 72(4), 633–656.
Bergström, J., and Boyce, M. C. (2000). “Large strain time-dependent behavior of filled elastomers.” Mech. Mater., 32(11), 627–642.
Billington, S. L., and Yoon, J. K. (2004). “Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete.” J. Bridge Eng., ), 353–363.
Caltrans. (2013). “Caltrans seismic design criteria---Version 1.7.” California Dept. of Transportation, Div. of Engineering Services, Sacramento, CA.
Chou, C.-C., and Chen, Y.-C. (2006). “Cyclic tests of post‐tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35(2), 159–175.
ElGawady, M. A., and Dawood, H. M. (2012). “Analysis of segmental piers consisted of concrete filled FRP tubes.” Eng. Struct., 38, 142–152.
Guerrini, G., Restrepo, J. I., Massari, M., and Vervelidis, A. (2015). “Seismic behavior of posttensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014115.
Haraldsson, O. S., Janes, T. M., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2013). “Seismic resistance of socket connection between footing and precast column.” J. Bridge Eng., 910–919.
Haraldsson, O. S., Pang, J. B., Stanton, J. F., and Eberhard, M. O. (2009). “A precast concrete bridge bent for seismic regions.” Proc., Special Int. Workshop on Seismic Connection Details for Segmental Bridge Construction–Tech. Rep. MCEER-09-0012, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Hewes, J. T. (2007). “Seismic tests on precast segmental concrete columns with unbonded tendons.” Bridge Struct., 3(3–4), 215–227.
Hewes, J. T., and Priestley, M. J. N. (2002). “Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns.” Rep. No. SSRP-2001/25, California Dept. of Transportatiom, Sacramento, CA.
Lee, J., and Fenves, G. L. (1998). “Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures.” J. Eng. Mech., ), 892–900.
Lehman, D. E., and Roeder, C. W. (2012). “Foundation connections for circular concrete-filled tubes.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 78, 212–225.
Lion, A. (1996). “A constitutive model for carbon black filled rubber: Experimental investigations and mathematical representation.” Continuum Mech. Thermodyn., 8(3), 153–169.
Lubliner, J., Oliver, J., Oller, S., and Oñate, E. (1989). “A plastic-damage model for concrete.” Int. J. Solids Struct., 25(3), 299–326.
Mander, J. B., and Cheng, C.-T. (1997). “Seismic design of bridge piers based on damage avoidance design (NCEER-97-0014).” National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Marriott, D. J. (2009). “The development of high-performance post-tensioned rocking systems for the seismic design of structures.” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Canterbury, New Zealand.
Marriott, D., Pampanin, S., and Palermo, A. (2009). “Quasi‐static and pseudo‐dynamic testing of unbonded post‐tensioned rocking bridge piers with external replaceable dissipaters.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 38(3), 331–354.
Matsumoto, E. E., Waggoner, M. C., Kreger, M. E., Vogel, J., and Wolf, L. (2008). “Development of a precast concrete bent-cap system.” PCI J., 53(3), 74–99.
Motaref, S., Saiidi, M. S., and Sanders, D. (2014). “Shake table studies of energy-dissipating segmental bridge columns.” J. Bridge Eng., 186–199.
Ou, Y.-C., Chiewanichakorn, M., Aref, A. J., and Lee, G. C. (2007). “Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns.” J. Struct. Eng., ), 1636–1647.
Ou, Y.-C., Tsai, M.-S., Chang, K.-C., and Lee, G. C. (2010a). “Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(11), 1181–1198.
Ou, Y.-C., Wang, P.-H., Tsai, M.-S., Chang, K.-C., and Lee, G. C. (2010b). “Large-scale experimental study of precast segmental unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns for seismic regions.” J. Struct. Eng., 255–264.
Pang, J. B. K., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2010). “Large-bar connection for precast bridge bents in seismic regions.” J. Bridge Eng., 231–239.
Pantelides, C. P., Ameli, M. J., Parks, J. E., Brown, D. N. (2014). Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for precast RC bridge piers in ABC, Utah Dept. of Transportation, Salt Lake City.
PolyUMod [Computer software]. Veryst Engineering, Needham Heights, MA.
Qi, H. J., and Boyce, M. C. (2004). “Constitutive model for stretch-induced softening of the stress–stretch behavior of elastomeric materials.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 52(10), 2187–2205.
Qi, H. J., and Boyce, M. C. (2005). “Stress–strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes.” Mech. Mater., 37(8), 817–839.
Restrepo, J. I., Tobolski, M. J., and Matsumoto, E. E. (2011). “Development of a precast bent cap system for seismic regions.” NCHRP Rep. No 681, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Roh, H., and Reinhorn, A. M. (2010). “Hysteretic behavior of precast segmental bridge piers with superelastic shape memory alloy bars.” Eng. Struct., 32(10), 3394–3403.
Sideris, P. (2012). “Seismic analysis and design of precast concrete segmental bridges.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Sideris, P., Aref, A. J., and Filiatrault, A. (2014a). “Large-scale seismic testing of a hybrid sliding-rocking post-tensioned segmental bridge system.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014025.
Sideris, P., Aref, A. J., and Filiatrault, A. (2014b). “Quasi-static cyclic testing of a large-scale hybrid sliding-rocking segmental column with slip-dominant joints.” J. Bridge Eng., 04014036.
Sideris, P., Aref, A. J., and Filiatrault, A. (2015). “Experimental seismic performance of a hybrid sliding-rocking bridge for various specimen configurations and seismic loading conditions.” J. Bridge Eng., 04015009.
SIMULIA. (2013). Abaqus 6.13 analysis user’s manual, Providence, RI.
Standards New Zealand. (2006). “Concrete structures standard. Part 1: The design of concrete structures.” NZS3101, Wellington, New Zealand.
Tazarv, M., and Saiidi, M. S. (2015). “UHPC-filled duct connections for accelerated bridge construction of RC columns in high seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 99, 413–422.
Veryst Engineering. (2016). PolyUMod: A library for advanced user materials, Needham Heights, MA.
Wang, J. C., Ou, Y. C., Chang, K. C., and Lee, G. C. (2008). “Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(12):1449–1465.
Weinert, M. D. (2011). “Substructure connections for accelerated bridge construction in seismic regions.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
White, S. L. (2014). “Controlled damage rocking systems for accelerated bridge construction.” Master’s thesis, Dept. of Civil and Natural Resource Engineering, Univ. of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 22Issue 10October 2017

History

Received: Aug 5, 2016
Accepted: Feb 23, 2017
Published online: Jul 19, 2017
Published in print: Oct 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Dec 19, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

M. T. Nikoukalam, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Student Researcher and Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309. E-mail: [email protected]
P. Sideris, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, Univ. of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share