Abstract

Despite the major advances in finite-element (FE) modeling and system identification (SI) of extended infrastructures, soil compliance and damping at the soil–foundation interface are not often accurately accounted for due to the associated computational demand and the inherent uncertainty in defining the dynamic stiffness. This paper aims to scrutinize the effect of soil conditions in the SI process and to investigate the efficiency of advanced FE modeling in representing the superstructure–soil–foundation stiffness. For this purpose, measured, computed, and experimentally identified natural frequencies of a real bridge were used. Field measurements obtained during construction were reproduced both in the laboratory and by refined FE modeling. In addition, to understand the physical problem more thoroughly, three alternative soil conditions were examined: rock, stabilized soil, and Hostun sand. Discrepancies on the order of 3–13% were observed between the identified and the numerically predicted natural frequencies. These discrepancies highlight the importance of reliable estimation of soil properties and compliance with the SI framework for extended bridges under ambient and low-amplitude vibrations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The work presented herein was supported by a research grant from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst) organization (Grant No. 57055451, Project: DeGrie Lab-Hybrid and Virtual Experimentation for Infrastructures funded by DAAD, Germany). This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank K. Papadimitriou (University of Thessaly) for making available the measurements of the prototype structure, as well as G. Manolis (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki) for scientific input at various stages of this work.

References

Abaqus 6.12 [Computer software]. Simulia, Pawtucket, RI.
Allemang, R. J., and Brown, D. L. (1982). “A correlation coefficient for modal vector analysis.” Proc., 1st Int. Modal Analysis Conf., SEM, Bethel, CT, 110–116.
Andersen, P., Brincker, R., Peeters, B., De Roeck, G., Hermans, L., and Kramer, C. (1999). “Comparison of system identification methods using ambient bridge test data.” Proc., 17th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., SEM, Bethel, CT, 1, 1035–1041.
Antonacci, E., De Stefano, A., Gattulli, V., Lepidi, M., and Matta, E. (2012). “Comparative study of vibration-based parametric identification techniques for a three-dimensional frame structure.” Struct. Control Health Monit., 19(5), 579–608.
ASTM. (2011). “Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system).” ASTM D2487, West Conshohocken, PA.
Beuth. (2010). “Building lime–Part 1: Definitions, specifications and conformity criteria.” DIN Standard EN 459-1, Berlin, Germany.
Bridgman, P. W. (1931). Dimensional analysis, 2nd Ed., Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). (2004). “Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.” European Standard EN 1998-1, Brussels, Belgium.
Chaudhary, M. T. A., Abé, M., and Fujino, Y. (2001). “Identification of soil-structure interaction effects in base isolated bridges from earthquake records.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake. Eng., 21(8), 713–725.
Crouse, C. B., Hushmand, B., and Martin, G. R. (1987). “Dynamic soil-structure interaction of single-span bridge.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 15(6), 711–729.
Dominguez, J., and Roesset, J. M. (1978). “Dynamic stiffness of rectangular foundations.” Research Rep., R78-20, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Elsabee, F., and Morray, J. P. (1977). “Dynamic behaviour of embedded foundations.” Research Rep., R77-33, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Faraonis, P., Sextos, A., Zabel, V., and Wuttke, F. (2014). “Dynamic stiffness of bridge-soil systems based on site and laboratory measurements.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Bridges Innovations on Bridges and Bridge-Soil Interaction, Eugenides Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Finn, W. D. L. (2005). “A study of piles during earthquakes: Issues of design and analysis.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 3(2), 141–234.
Gazetas, G., Dobry, R., and Tassoulas, J. (1985). “Vertical response of arbitrarily-shaped embedded foundations.” J. Geotech. Eng., 750–771.
Gerolymos, N., and Gazetas, G. (2006). “Development of Winkler model for static and dynamic response of caisson foundations with soil and interface nonlinearities.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 26(5), 363–376.
Kausel, E. (1974). “Soil-forced vibrations of circular foundations on layered media.” Research Rep., R76-06, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Kausel, E., and Ushijima, R. (1979). “Vertical and torsional stiffness of circular footings.” Research Rep., R74-11, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Manos G., Pitiklakis, K., Sextos A., Kourtides, V., Soulis, V., and Thaumpteh, J. (2014). “Field experiments for monitoring the dynamic soil–structure–foundation response of a bridge-pier model structure at a test site.” J. Struct. Eng., D4014012.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Panetsos, P., Ntotsios, E., Papadimitriou, C., Papadioti, C., and Dakoulas, P. (2010). “Health monitoring of Metsovo bridge using ambient vibrations.” Proc., 5th European WorkshopStructural Health Monitoring, DEStech, Lancaster, PA, 1081–1088.
Peeters, B., and De Roeck, G. (1999). “Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process., 13(6), 855–878.
Peeters, B., and De Roeck, G. (2001). “Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: A review.” J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, 123(4), 659–667.
Peeters, B., and Ventura, C. E. (2003). “Comparative study of modal analysis techniques for bridge dynamic.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process, 17(5), 965–988.
Reynders, E. (2012). “System identification methods for (operational) modal analysis: Review and comparison.” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 19(1), 51–124.
Reynders, E., and De Roeck, G. (2007). “System identification and operational modal analysis with MACEC enhanced.” Proc., 2nd Int. Operational Modal Analysis Conf., Dept. of Civil Engineering Alborg Univ., Copenhagen, Denmark, 1, 297–304.
Sextos, A. (2014). “ICT applications for new generation seismic design, construction and assessment of bridges.” Struct. Eng. Int., 24(2), 173–183.
Shamsabadi, A., Abazarsa, F., Ghahari, S. F. and Taciroglu, E. (2016). “Bridge instrumentation: Needs, options, consequences.” Developments in international bridge engineering: Selected papers from Istanbul Bridge Conference 2014, Springer, New York, 199–210.
Stewart, J. P., and Fenves, G. L. (1998). “System identification for evaluating soil-structure interaction effects in buildings from strong motion recordings.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 27(8), 869–885.
Taciroglu, E., Shamsabadi, A., Abazarsa, F., Nigbor, R., and Ghahari, S. F. (2014). “Comparative study of model predictions and data from the Caltrans-CSMIP Bridge Instrumentation Program: A case study on the Eureka-Samoa Channel Bridge.” Rep. No. UCLA-SGEL 2014/01, Structural and Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory, Univ. of California, Los Angeles (also Caltrans Report No. CA14-2418).
Todorovska, M. (2009). “Soil-structure identification of Millikan library north-south response during four earthquakes (1970-2002). What caused the observed wandering of the system frequencies.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 99(2A), 626–636.
Van Overschee, P., and De Moor, B. (1996). Subspace identification for linear systems, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Varun, D. A., and Gazetas, G. (2009). “A simplified model for lateral response of large diameter caisson foundations—Linear elastic formulation.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 29(2), 268–291.
Veletsos, A. S., and Wei, Y. T. (1971). “Lateral and rocking vibrations of footings.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., 97(SM9), 1227–1248.
Wolf, J. P. (1989). “Soil-structure interaction analysis in time domain.” Nucl. Eng. Des., 111(3), 381–393.
Wong, H. L., and Luco, J. E. (1985). “Tables of impedance functions for square foundations on layered media.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 4(2), 64–81.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21Issue 10October 2016

History

Received: Jun 10, 2015
Accepted: Feb 10, 2016
Published online: Apr 13, 2016
Discussion open until: Sep 13, 2016
Published in print: Oct 1, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anastasios Sextos, M.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, U.K. (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Periklis Faraonis [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Aristotle Univ. of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]
Volkmar Zabel, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Associate and Lecturer, Bauhaus-Univ. Weimar, Marienstrasse 15, 99421 Weimar, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Frank Wuttke [email protected]
Professor, Chair of Marine and Land Geomechanics and Geotechnics, Kiel Univ., Ludewig-Meyn St. 10, 24118 Kiel, Germany; formerly, Bauhaus-Univ. Weimar, Faculty Civil Engineering, Coudraystrasse 11C, 99423 Weimar, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Tobias Arndt [email protected]
Ph.D. Student, Bauhaus-Univ. Weimar, Coudraystrasse 11c, 99423 Weimar, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Panagiotis Panetsos, Ph.D. [email protected]
Head, Capital Maintenance Dept., Egnatia Odos S.A., 60km Thessaloniki-Thermi, 57001 Thermi, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share