Technical Paper
Jan 22, 2016

Assessing Relative Risk for the Failure Modes of a Bridge Scour Countermeasure

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 5

Abstract

Widely used failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) can be very effective in assessing the relative risks of the failure modes of a bridge scour countermeasure. In this study, an approach is developed for assessing the relative risks of failure modes of a bridge scour countermeasure overcoming the limitations of risk priority numbers (RPNs) associated with individual failure modes. Appropriate application of the RPNs is established by ensuring that high values of RPNs, indicating a relatively higher risk of failure, have higher severity and occurrence ratings compared with the low RPNs, indicating low risk. Replacement of the use of RPNs with risk priority codes (RPCs) enables engineers to prioritize the risks for any severity-occurrence pair using the same scale as the ratings, unlike the RPNs. Given the simplicity and effectiveness of this technique, RPCs are shown to be preferable for assessing and prioritizing the relative risks of the failure modes of a bridge scour countermeasure.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge partial support from the Ohio Department of Transportation and from Penn State University.

References

Bhuiyan, F., Hey, R. D., and Wormleaton, P. R. (2007). “Hydraulic evaluation of weir for river restoration.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 596–609.
Bluvband, Z., Grabov, P., and Narkar, O. (2004). “Expanded FMEA (EFMEA).” Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symp.–2004 Proc., Int. Symp. on Product Quality and Integrity, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 31–36.
Bowles, J. B. (2003). “An assessment of RPN prioritization in a failure mode effects and criticality analysis.” Proc., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symp., IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 380–386.
Bowles, J. B., and Peláez, C. E. (1995). “Fuzzy logic prioritization of failures in a system failure mode, effects and criticality analysis.” Rel. Eng. System Safety, 50(2), 203–213.
Chen, J. J., Tsai, C. A., Moon, H., Ahn, H., Young, J. J., and Chen, C. H. (2006). “Decision threshold adjustment in class prediction.” SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 17(3), 337–352.
Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M., Poon, G. K. K., and Yang, J. B. (2009). “Failure mode and effects analysis by data envelopment analysis.” Decis. Support Syst., 48(1), 246–256.
Cox, L. A., Jr.(2008). “What’s wrong with risk matrices?” Risk Anal., 28(2), 497–512.
Dahle, B P. (2008).“Evaluating shallow-flow rock structures as scour countermeasures at bridges.” Master’s thesis, Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT.
Dreiseitl, S., Ohno-Machado, L., and Vinterbo, S. (1999). “Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infraction.” Proc., AMIA Symp., Bethesda, MD, 246–250.
Elias, V. (1994). “Strategies for managing unknown bridge foundations.” FHWA Rep. No. FHWA-RD-92-030, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, VA.
Ettema, R., and Muste, M. (2004). “Scale effects in flume experiments on flow around a spur dike in flatbed channel.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 130(7), 635–646.
Franceschini, F., and Galetto, M. (2001). “A new approach for evaluation of risk priorities of failure modes in FMEA.” Int. J. Prod. Res., 39(13), 2991–3002.
Gargama, H., and Chaturvedi, S. K. (2011). “Criticality assessment models for failure mode effects and criticality analysis using fuzzy logic.” IEEE Trans. Reliab., 60(1), 102–110.
Johnson, P. A. (2011). “Risk-based framework for stream repair projects.” Int. Conf. on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM) and Int. Symp. on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis (ISUMA) Conf., Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk, ASCE, Reston, VA, 570–577.
Johnson, P. A., Hey, R. D., Brown, E. R., and Rosgen, D. L. (2002a). “Stream restoration in the vicinity of bridges.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(1), 55–67.
Johnson, P. A., Hey, R. D., Tessier, M., and Rosgen, D. L. (2001). “Use of vanes for control of scour at vertical wall abutments.” J. Hydraul Eng., 772–778.
Johnson, P. A., and Niezgoda, S. L. (2004). “Risk based method for selecting bridge scour countermeasures.” J. Hydraulic Eng., 121–128.
Johnson, P. A., Tereska, R. L., and Brown, E. R. (2002b). “Using technical adaptive management to improve design guidelines for urban instream structures.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 38(4), 1143–1152.
Lagasse P. F., Clopper, P. E., Pagan-Ortiz, J. E., and Zevenbergen, L. W. (2009). “Bridge scour and stream instability countermeasures, experience, selection, and design guidance—third edition.” FHWA Rep. No. NHI-09-111, HEC-23, 3rd Ed., Federal Highway Administration, Arlington, VA.
Lloyd, G. R., Brereton, R. G., Faria, R., and Duncan, J. C. (2007). “Learning vector quantization for multiclass classification: Application of characterization of plastics.” J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47(4), 1553–1563.
Mooney, D. M., Holmquist-Johnson, C. L., and Holburn, E. (2007). Qualitative evaluation rock weir field performance and failure mechanisms, United States Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center, Denver, CO.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). (2000). Failure modes and effects analysis, Washington, DC.
Newlin, J. T., and Schultz, B. P. (2015). “Hydraulic interaction between rock cross vane stream restoration structures and a bridge crossing.” River Res. Appl., 31(9), 1183–1194.
Niu, Y. M., He, Y. Z., Li, J. H., and Zhao, X. J. (2009). “The optimization of RPN criticality analysis method in FMECA.” 2009 Int. Conf. on Apperceiving Computing and Intelligence Analysis, IEEE, New York, 166–170.
Papanicolaou, A. N., Elhakeem, M., and Wardman, B. (2011). “Calibration and verification of a 2D-hydrodynamic model for simulating flow around bendway weir structures.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 137(1), 75–89.
Radspinner, R. R., Diplas, P., Lighoasis:tbody, A. F., and Sotiropoulos, F. (2010). “River training and ecological enhancement potential using in-stream structures.” J. Hydraul Eng., 967–980.
Rajaratnam, N., and Nwachukwu, B. A. (1983). “Erosion near groyne-like structures.” J. Hydraul. Res., 21(4), 277–287.
Rosgen, D. L. (2001). “The cross-vane, weir, and j-hook structures: Their description, design and application for stream stabilization and river restoration.” Proc., Wetland Engineering and River Restoration Conf., ASCE, Reston, VA.
Sankar, N. R., and Prabhu, B. S. (2001). “Modified approach for prioritization of failures in a system failure mode and effects analysis.” Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage., 18(3), 324–335.
Sotiropoulos, F., and Diplas, P. (2014). “Design methods for in-stream flow control structures.” NCHRP Rep. No. 795, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Stein, S. M., Pearson, D. R., and Jones, J. S. (2000). “Economic considerations in designing bridge scour countermeasures.” Proc., 2000 ASCE Joint Conf. on Water Resources Eng. and Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, Reston, VA.
Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., Poon, G. K. K., and Yang, J. B. (2009). “Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean.” Expert Systems Appl., 36(2), 1195–1207.
Wheeler, D. J. (2011). “Problems with risk priority numbers.” 〈http://www.qualitydigest.com/inside/quality-insider-column/problems-risk-prriority-numbers.html#〉 (Jun. 27, 2011).
Wu, J., Tian, J., and Zhao, T. (2014). “Failure mode prioritization by improved RPN calculation method.” Proc., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symp., IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
Yager, R. R. (1993). “Non-numeric multi-criteria multi-person decision making.” Group Decis. Negot., 2(1), 81–93.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21Issue 5May 2016

History

Received: Jun 24, 2015
Accepted: Nov 20, 2015
Published online: Jan 22, 2016
Published in print: May 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 22, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fahmidah U. Ashraf [email protected]
Visiting Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Villanova Univ., Villanova, PA 19085. E-mail: [email protected]
Peggy A. Johnson, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and Head, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share