Effects of Exponentially Modified Sinusoidal Oscillation and Amplitude on Bridge Deck Flutter Derivatives
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 5
Abstract
With the use of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation, in this study an unusual exponentially modified sinusoidal (EMS) oscillation was forcibly imposed on deck section to simulate amplitude-varying self-excited forces. This approach facilitated the investigation of the influence of EMS transient oscillation and amplitude on self-excited forces and flutter derivatives. Study results show that for an ideal thin plate, the sensitivities of , , , and to oscillation decaying/diverging ratio () were higher than those of , , , and . With different amplitudes, , and reduced wind velocities, the self-excited forces of one flat plate and two bluff bridge decks were numerically calculated and the flutter derivatives were extracted and compared with the theoretical and experimental results. If < 0.1, its influence was almost negligible, by which the traditional sinusoidal oscillation technique was validated. The heaving and torsional amplitudes had different influences on each flutter derivative. The influences were also related to deck cross sections and reduced wind velocities. The proposed numerical simulation of EMS oscillation enables a better understanding of the influence of oscillation amplitude and on bridge deck flutter derivatives.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The research was jointly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51178086 and 51478087), which is gratefully acknowledged.
References
ANSYS. (2005a). FLUENT 6.3 theory guide, Canonsburg, PA.
ANSYS. (2005b). FLUENT 6.3 user's guide, Canonsburg, PA.
Bartoli, G., Contri, S., Mannini, C., and Righi, M. (2009). “Toward an improvement in the identification of bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Eng. Mech., 771–785.
Chen, Z., Yu, X., Yang, G., and Spencer, B. (2005). “Wind-induced self-excited loads on bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 1783–1793.
Diana, G., Resta, F., and Rocchi, D. (2008). “A new numerical approach to reproduce bridge aerodynamic non-linearities in time domain.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96(10–11), 1871–1884.
FLUENT 6.3 [Computer software]. ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
Fransos, D., and Bruno, L. (2006). “Determination of the aeroelastic transfer functions for streamlined bodies by means of a Navier–Stokes solver.” Math. Comput. Modell., 43(5–6), 506–529.
Král, R., Pospíšil, S., and Náprstek, J. (2014). “Wind tunnel experiments on unstable self-excited vibration of sectional girders.” J. Fluids Struct., 44, 235–250.
Mannini, C., and Bartoli, G. (2008). “Investigation on the dependence of bridge deck flutter derivatives on steady angle of attack.” Proc., BBAA VI Int. Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics & Applications, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano, Italy, 1–14.
Mannini, C., Šoda, A., Voß, R., and Schewe, G. (2010). ”Unsteady RANS simulations of flow around a bridge section.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 98(12), 742–753.
Matsumoto, M. (1996). “Aerodynamic damping of prisms.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 59(2–3), 159–175.
Menter, F. R. (1994). “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.” AIAA J., 32(8), 1598–1605.
Noda, M., Utsunomiya, H., Nagao, F., Kanda, M., and Shiraishi, N. (2003). “Effects of oscillation amplitude on aerodynamic derivatives.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 91(1), 101–111.
Sarkar, P. P., Caracoglia, L., Haan, F. L., Sato, H., and Murakoshi, J. (2009). “Comparative and sensitivity study of flutter derivatives of selected bridge deck sections. Part 1: Analysis of inter-laboratory experimental data.” Eng. Struct., 31(1), 158–169.
Šarkić, A., Fisch, R., Höffer, R., and Bletzinger, K. U. (2012). “Bridge flutter derivatives based on computed, validated pressure fields.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 104–106, 141–151.
Scanlan, R. H., and Tomko, J. (1971). “Air foil and bridge deck flutter derivatives.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., 97(6), 1717–1737.
Xu, F. Y., Chen, X. Z., and Cai, C. S. (2012). “Determination of 18 flutter derivatives of bridge decks by an improved stochastic search algorithm.” J. Bridge. Eng., 576–588.
Xu, F. Y., Ying, X. Y., and Zhang, Z. (2014). “Three-degree-of-freedom coupled numerical technique for extracting 18 aerodynamic derivatives of bridge decks.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014085.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 16, 2015
Accepted: Oct 27, 2015
Published online: Jan 20, 2016
Published in print: May 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 20, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.