Technical Paper
Jan 4, 2016

Shaking Table Performance of a New Bridge System with Pretensioned Rocking Columns

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 4

Abstract

A new bridge bent system has been developed to reduce on-site construction time, minimize residual displacements even after a large earthquake, and reduce seismic damage in comparison with conventional cast-in-place construction. Accelerated construction is achieved through the use of precast columns and cap beams that can be assembled quickly. Postearthquake residual displacements are reduced by pretensioning the columns with partially unbonded tendons. Damage in the columns is nearly eliminated by concentrating flexural deformations to specially detailed regions at the top and bottom of the columns. In this study, the seismic performance of the new system was evaluated with a multi-shaking table test of a quarter scale, two-span bridge at the Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) Earthquake Engineering Laboratory at the University of Nevada, Reno. The maximum displacements of the bents were similar to those expected for a conventional bridge through the 100% design-level event [peak ground acceleration (PGA) = 0.75 g]. Residual drift ratios never exceeded 0.2% up to the 221% design-level motion (PGA = 1.66 g). Damage to the column concrete was negligible; the columns would not need any repair after being subjected to the 100% design-level motion. The only structural damage to the bridge was the eventual fracture of the column’s longitudinal reinforcement and bulging of the column’s confining tube, both of which occurred at drift ratios of approximately 6%. These damage states could be delayed by increasing the debonded length of the deformed bar reinforcement at the ends of the columns and by using a thicker steel tube for the confining detail.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation George Brown NEES Research Program (CMMI-1207903) and the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. The bridge specimen was tested at the NEES Equipment Site at the University of Nevada, Reno (NEES Ops NSF08-574). The findings and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors alone.
The precast columns and cap beams were fabricated at the University of Washington with the assistance of laboratory manager Vince Chaijareon and students Jimmy Au, Lisa Berg, Peter Deng, Olafur Harladsson, Monika Keller, Bryan Kennedy, Stephanie Kuroda, Spencer Livermore, Max Stephens, Scott Tetzlaff, Hung Viet Tran, Kevin Tsuchida, Connor Tsuchida, Lucas Whitesell, and Chase Young.
The specimen was constructed at the University of Nevada, Reno, with the assistance of laboratory manager Patrick Laplace, laboratory technicians Chad Lyttle and Todd Lyttle, and students Osvaldo Arias, Lisa Bryant, Mimi Mungedi, Guillermo Munoz, Taylor Nielsen, and Eric Ramirez. The support of all of the research participants is gratefully acknowledged.

References

AASHTO. (2011). AASHTO guide specification for LRFD seismic bridge design, 2nd Ed., Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications, 6th Ed., Washington, DC.
Ameli, M. J., Parks, J. E., Brown, D. N., and Pantelides, C. P. (2015). “Seismic evaluation of grouted splice sleeve connections for reinforced precast concrete column–to–cap beam joints in accelerated bridge construction.” PCI J., 60(2), 80–103.
Billington, S. L., and Yoon, J. K. (2004). “Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiber-reinforced concrete.” J. Bridge Eng., 353–363.
Cohagen, L. S., Pang, J. B. K., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2008). “A precast concrete bridge bent designed to re-center after an earthquake.” Washington State Dept. of Transportation Rep. No. WA-RD 684.3, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Seattle.
Cousins, T. E., Johnston, D. W., and Zia, P. (1990). “Transfer and development length of epoxy coated and uncoated prestressing strand.” PCI J., 35(4), 92–103.
Davis, P. M., Janes, T. M., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton J. F., (2012). “Unbonded pre-tensioned columns for bridges in seismic regions.” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Rep., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Elwood, K. J., and Eberhard, M. O. (2009). “Effective stiffness of reinforced concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J., 106(4), 476–484.
FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). (2011). Accelerated bridge construction: Experience in design, fabrication and excretion of prefabricated elements and systems, Office of Bridge Technology, Washington, DC.
Finnsson, G., Stanton, J. F., and Eberhard, M. O. (2013). “Unbonded pre-tensioned bridge columns with hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete shells.” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Rep., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Guerrini, G., Restrepo, J., Massari, M., and Vervelidis, A. (2015). “Seismic behavior of posttensioned self-centering precast concrete dual-shell steel columns.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014115.
Haber, Z., Saiidi, M., and Sanders, D. (2013). “Precast column-footing connections for accelerated bridge construction in seismic zones.” Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Rep. No. CCEER-13-08, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV.
Haraldsson, O. S., Janes, T. M., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2013). “Seismic resistance of socket connection between footing and precast column.” J. Bridge Eng., 910–919.
Johnson, N., Ranf, R., Saiidi, M., Sanders, D., and Eberhard, M. (2008). “Seismic testing of a two-span reinforced concrete bridge.” J. Bridge Eng., 173–182.
Kennedy, B. (2015). “Rocking connection between a precast bridge column and cap beam.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Khaleghi, B., et al. (2012). “Accelerated bridge construction in Washington state: From research to practice.” PCI J., 57(4), 34–49.
Mantawy, I., Thonstad, T., Sanders, D. H., Stanton, J. F, and Eberhard, M. O. (2014) “Earthquake shake table testing of a self-centering ABC bridge.” National Accelerated Bridge Construction Conf., Accelerated Bridge Construction–University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC), Miami.
Marsh, L. M., Wernli, M., Garrett, B. E.,Stanton, J. F.,Eberhard, M. O., and Weinert, M. D. (2011). “Application of accelerated bridge construction connections in moderate-to-high seismic regions.” NCHRP Rep. 698, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Mashal, M., and Palermo, A. (2014). “Quasi-static experimental testing of emulative and low-damage seismic technologies for accelerated bridge construction in seismic areas.” National Accelerated Bridge Construction Conf., Accelerated Bridge Construction–University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC), Miami.
Matsumoto, E., Waggoner, M., Kreger, M., Vogel, J., and Wolf, L. (2008). “Development of a precast concrete bent-cap system. PCI J., 53(3), 74–99.
Motaref, S., Saiidi, M. S., and Sanders, D. (2010). “Experimental study of precast bridge columns with built-in elastomer.” Transportation Research Record, 2202, 109–116.
Nakaki, S. D., Stanton, J. F., and Sritharan, S. (1999). “An overview of the PRESSS five-story precast test building.” PCI J., 44(2), 26–39.
Nakashoji, B., and Saiidi, M. S. (2014). “Seismic performance of square nickel-titanium reinforced ECC columns with headed couplers.” Center for Civil Engineering Earthquake Research, Rep. No. CCEER-14-05, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV.
Ou, Y. C., Tsai, M. S., Chang, K. C., and Lee, G. C. (2010). “Cyclic behavior of precast segmental concrete bridge columns with high performance or conventional steel reinforcing bars as energy dissipation bars.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 394(11), 1181–1198.
Panagiotou, M., Trono, W., Jen, G., Kumar, P., and Ostertag, C. (2014). “Experimental seismic response of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete bridge columns with novel longitudinal reinforcement detailing.” J. Bridge Eng., 04014090.
Pang, J. B. K., Eberhard, M. O., and Stanton, J. F. (2010). “Large-bar connection for precast bridge bents in seismic regions,.” J. Bridge Eng., 231–239.
PEER. (2013). PEER ground motion database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Restrepo, J., Matsumoto, E., and Tobolski, M. (2011). “Development of precast bent cap systems for seismic regions.” NCHRP Rep. No. 681, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
Rouse, J. M., and Billington, S. L. (2003). “Behavior of bridge piers with ductile fiber reinforced hinge regions and vertical, unbonded post-tensioning,” Proc., Fib Symp. on Concrete Structures in Seismic Regions, Technical Chamber of Greece, Athens, Greece.
Schaefer, J., Kennedy, B., Stanton, J. F., and Eberhard, M. O. (2013). “Unbonded pretensioned bridge columns with rocking detail.” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Rep. 2014/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
Stanton, J., Stone, W. C., and Cheok, G. S. (1997). “Hybrid reinforced precast frame for seismic regions.” PCI J., 42(2), 20–32.
Stone, W. C., Cheok, G. S., and Stanton, J. F. (1995). “Beam-column connections subjected to cyclic loads.” ACI Struct. J., 92(2), 229–249.
Thonstad, T., Mantawy, I., Stanton, J. F., Eberhard, M. O., and Sanders, D. (2015). “Shake table testing of a two-span bridge specimen with unbonded, pre-tensioned rocking columns.” Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (distributor), Dataset, D33B5W88M.
Tran, H. V. (2015). “Drilled shaft socket connections for precast columns in seismic regions.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Trono, W., Jen, G., Panagiotou, M., Schoettler, M., and Ostertag, C. (2014). “Seismic response of a damage-resistant recentering posttensioned-HYFRC bridge column.” J. Bridge Eng., 04014096.
Varela, S., and Saiidi, M. (2014). “Dynamic performance of innovative bridge columns with superelastic CuAlMn shape memory alloy and ECC.” Intl. J. Bridge Eng., 2(3), 29–58.
Walsh, K. Q., & Kurama, Y. C. (2012). Effects of loading conditions on the behavior of unbonded post-tensioning strand-anchorage systems.” PCI J., 57(1), 76–96.
Weinert, M. D. (2011). “Substructure connections for accelerated bridge construction in seismic regions.” MSCE thesis, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
Yamashita, R., and Sanders, D. (2009). “Seismic performance of precast unbonded prestressed concrete columns.” ACI Struct. J., 106(6), 821–830.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21Issue 4April 2016

History

Received: May 7, 2015
Accepted: Sep 24, 2015
Published online: Jan 4, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jun 4, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Travis Thonstad, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5502 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Islam M. Mantawy, S.M.ASCE
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV 89503.
John F. Stanton
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5502.
Marc O. Eberhard
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5502.
David H. Sanders, F.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV 89503.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share