Case Study on Applications of Structural Fuses in Bridge Bents
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 7
Abstract
In seismic design, bridges are typically designed to undergo inelastic deformations during a severe earthquake. In those instances, most of the seismic energy is dissipated through hysteretic behavior of the critical load-resisting components, which results in permanent system deformations and damage and could make repairs expensive or, in some cases, impossible. Thus, concentrating earthquake damage in structural fuses inserted in bridge bents is desirable; the performance objective is for the main gravity load-bearing members (the columns, in this case) to be intact after an earthquake, limiting repairs to fuses that can be removed and replaced easily. This paper presents results from case studies that considered the use of buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) as hysteretic energy-dissipation devices inserted in bridge bents to dissipate earthquake energy and improve structural performance by minimizing inelastic demands on the columns. A typical California bridge was used for this purpose. For structural fuse application only in the transverse direction (along the bent), results indicate that BRBs are implementable. Alternative bent configurations were also considered to provide the benefit of structural fuses for seismic excitations in the bridge’s longitudinal and transverse directions. Findings are presented along with observations from a comparison of seismic responses between bridges with and those without structural fuses in their bents.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This study was sponsored by Caltrans under research Contract Number 65A0432. The authors acknowledge the valuable comments and feedback from Caltrans. However, any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor.
References
AASHTO. (2011). “AASHTO guide specifications for LRFD seismic bridge design.” 2nd Ed. Washington, DC.
AASHTO. (2014). “AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications.” 7th Ed. Washington, DC.
Aiken, I. D., Clark, P. W., Tajirian, F. F., Kasai, K., Kimura, I., and Ko, E. (2000). “Unbonded braces in the United States—Design studies, large-scale testing and the first building application.” Proc., Japan Passive Control Symp., Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan.
AISC. (2010). “Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings.” AISC 341-10, Chicago.
BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council). (2003). NEHRP recommended provisions and commentary for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 450), Washington, DC.
Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). (2010). “Caltrans seismic design criteria.” Version 1.6, Sacramento, CA.
Carden, L., Itani, A. P. E., and Buckle, F. I. (2006). “Seismic performance of steel girder bridges with ductile cross frames using buckling-restrained braces.” J. Struct. Eng., 338–345.
Clark, P., Aiken, I., Kasai, K., and Kimura, I. (2000). “Large-scale testing of steel unbonded braces for energy dissipation.” Adv. Technol. Struct. Eng., 1–5.
El-Bahey, S., and Bruneau, M., (2010). “Analytical development and experimental validation of a structural-fuse bridge pier concept.” Tech. Rep. MCEER-10-0005, MCEER, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Hamada, N., Nishioka, T., and Kanaji, H. (2007). “Seismic retrofitting of long-span truss bridge-Minato Bridge using damage-control technologies.” Steel Constr. Today Tomorrow, 19, 12–16.
Kanaji, H., Kitazawa, M., and Suzuki, N. (2005). “Seismic retrofit strategy using damage control design concept and the response reduction effect for a long-span truss bridge.” Proc., 19th US-Japan Bridge Eng. Workshop: UJNR Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects, United States/Japan Natural Resources Development Program, Tsukuba, Japan.
Lanning, J., Benzoni, G., and Uang, C. M. (2011) “The feasibility of using buckling-restrained braces for long-span bridges, a case study.” Tech. Rep. CA12-2149, Caltrans, Sacramento, CA.
Lopez, W., Gwie, D., Saunders, M., and Lauck, T. (2002) “Lessons learned from large-scale tests of unbonded braced frame subassemblage.” Proc., 71st Annual Convention, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA, 171–183.
López, W. A., and Sabelli, R. (2004). “Steel tips report: Seismic design of buckling-restrained braced frames.” Structural Steel Educational Council, Lafayette, CA.
MCEER-ATC 49 (2003). “Recommended LRFD guidelines for the seismic design of highway bridges.” Tech. Rep. MCEER-03-SP03, MCEER, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Oya, T., Fukasawa, T., Fujiwara, M., et al. (2009). “Practical study on a new type buckling-retrained-brace.” Proc., Int. Association for Shell and Spatial Structure (IASS) Symp., Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València, València, Spain.
Reno, M. L., and Pohl, M. N. (2010). “Seismic retrofit of California’s Auburn-Foresthill Bridge.” Transportation Research Record, 2201/2010, 83–94.
Rossi, P. (2015). “Importance of isotropic hardening in the modeling of buckling restrained braces.” J. Struct. Eng., 04014124.
SAP2000 14 [Computer software]. Computers & Structures, Inc., Walnut Creek, CA.
TARSCTHS (Target Acceleration Spectra Compatible Time Histories) [Computer software]. Version 1, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Uang, C. M., Bruneau, M. K., and Tsai, C. (2014). “Seismic design of steel bridges” The CRC handbook of bridge engineering—Seismic design, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 301–336.
Usami, T., Lu, Z., and Ge, H. (2005). “A seismic upgrading method for steel arch bridges using buckling-restrained braces.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(4–5), 471–496.
Vargas, R., and Bruneau, M. (2006). “Experimental investigation of the structural fuse concept.” Tech. Rep. MCEER-06-0005, MCEER, Univ. at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Wada, A., Huang, Y. H., and Iwata, M. (2000). “Passive damping technology for buildings in Japan.” Prog. Struct. Mater. Eng., 2(3), 335–350.
Wei, X., and Bruneau, M. (2013). “Resilient bridges: Replaceable structural fuses for post-earthquake accelerated service, phase 1: Analytical investigation,” Tech. Rep. CA13-2296, Caltrans, Sacramento, CA.
Zahrai, S. M., and Bruneau, M. (1999). “Ductile end-diaphragms for seismic retrofit of slab-on-girder steel bridges.” J. Struct. Eng., 71–80.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21 • Issue 7 • July 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 18, 2014
Accepted: Sep 14, 2015
Published online: Feb 8, 2016
Published in print: Jul 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Jul 8, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.