Optimization Indexes to Identify the Optimal Design Solution of Shell-Supported Bridges
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 3
Abstract
As a structural optimization technique, topology optimization is an important tool for helping designers to determine the most suitable shape of a structure. With this powerful tool, designers can define families of candidate solutions by modifying the input volume reduction (VR) ratio, reducing the structural weight as much as possible. However, finding the best compromise between material savings and structural performance among these candidate solutions is a critical issue for designers. To deal with this issue, an optimization index (OI) is presented in this paper. It provides a mathematical procedure that highlights the best choice among several candidate solutions obtained by the optimization procedure. The index was originally defined in a previous study on the structural optimization of composite steel-concrete bridges. In this paper, a generalized version of the original optimization index is introduced and used to investigate a particular aspect related to concrete shell-supported bridges. Starting from three shell-supported footbridges, the shapes of which are the final result of form-finding optimization procedures, different starting models are defined, and each is characterized by different edge-stiffening conditions. Despite using an anticlastic shell shape, unavoidable tensile stresses occur because of the thickness of the shell, variations in the material, the loading of the deck, and other factors. For each starting model, a finite-element topological optimization conducted with the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) method is performed to minimize the weight (i.e., volume) of the shell by a certain percentage. According to the results obtained from topology optimization, the proposed generalized optimization index (OI*) analytical formulation is discussed in detail, and its effectiveness is validated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ansola, R., Canales, J., Tárrago, J. A., and Rasmussen, J. (2002). “An integrated approach for shape and topology optimization of shell structures.” Comput. Struct., 80(5), 449–458.
ANSYS. (2007). 11.0 documentation for ANSYS, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
Banichuk, N. V., and Neittaanmäki, P. (2010). Structural optimization with uncertainties, Springer, New York.
Belegundu, A. D., and Chandrupatla, T. R. (2011). Optimization concepts and applications in engineering, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Bendsøe, M. P., and Sigmund, O. (1999). “Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization.” Arch. Appl. Mech., 69(9–10), 635–654.
Bendsoe, M. P., and Sigmund, O. (2003). Topology optimization: Theory, methods and applications, Springer, Berlin.
Block, P. (2009). “Thrust network analysis: exploring three-dimensional equilibrium.” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston.
Briseghella, B., Fenu, L., Feng, Y., Mazzarolo, E., and Zordan, T. (2013a). “Topology optimization of bridges supported by a concrete shell.” Struct. Eng. Int., 23(3), 285–294.
Briseghella, B., Fenu, L., Lan, C., Mazzarolo, E., and Zordan, T. (2013b). “Application of topological optimization to bridge design.” J. Bridge Eng., 790–800.
Burns, S. A. (2002). Recent advances in optimal structural design, ASCE Publications, Reston, VA.
Cannarozzi, M. (1981). “Un procedimento di ricerca di forma per reti di funi.” Costruzioni Metalliche, (1), 181–194.
Christensen, P. W., and Klarbring, A. (2009). An introduction to structural optimization, Springer Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
Day, A. S. (1965). “An introduction to dynamic relaxation.” Engineer, 219, 218–221.
Day, A. S. (1978). “A general computer technique for form finding for tension structures.” Proc., IASS Symp. on Development of Form, Morgantown, VA.
Day, A. S., and Bunce, J. W. (1970). “Analysis of cable networks by dynamic relaxation.” Civil Eng. Publ. Works Rev., 4 383–386.
Diehl, M., Glineur, F., Jarlebring, E., and Michiels, W. (2010). Recent advances in optimization and its applications in engineering, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Fenu, L., and Madama, G. (2005). “A method of shaping R/C shells with heuristic algorithms and with reference to Musmeci’s work.” Stud. Res., 25, 199–238.
Fenu, L., Madama, G., and Tattoni, S. (2006). “On the conceptual design of R/C footbridges made of deck and shells of minimal surface.” Stud. Res., 26, 103–126.
Fluegge, S. (1973). Stresses in shells, 2nd Ed., Springer, Berlin, 1.
Hassani, B., Tavakkoli, S. M., and Ghasemnejad, H. (2013). “Simultaneous shape and topology optimization of shell structures.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 48(1), 221–233.
Huang, X., and Xie, M. (2010). Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures: methods and applications, Wiley, New York.
Isler, H. (1994). “Concrete shells derived from experimental shapes.” Struct. Eng. Int., 4(3), 142–147.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., Jr., and Vecchi, M. P. (1983). “Optimization by simulated annealing.” Science, 220(4598), 671–680.
Linkwitz, K. (1999). “Formfinding by the ‘direct approach’ and pertinent strategies for the conceptual design of prestressed and hanging structures.” Int. J. Space Struct., 14(2), 73–87.
Majowiecki, M. (1994). Tensostrutture: Progetto e verifica, Edizioni CREA, Genova, Italy.
Musmeci, S. (1977). “Ponte sul basento a potenza.” Industria Italiana del Cemento, 2, 77–98.
Otto, F., Trostel, R., and Schleyer, F. K. (1973). Tensile structures; design, structure, and calculati on of buildings of cables, nets, and membranes, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Powell, M. J. D. (1964). “An efficient method for finding the minimum of a function of several variables without calculating derivatives.” Comput. J., 7(2), 155–162.
Rippmann, M., and Block, P. (2013). “Funicular shell design exploration.” Proc., 33rd Annual Conf. of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA), Riverside Architectural Press, Toronto.
Rippmann, M., Lachauer, L., and Block, P. (2012). “Interactive vault design.” Int. J. Space Struct., 27(4), 219–230.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (2009). “A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 37(3), 217–237.
Sceck, H. J. (1974). “The force density method for form finding and computation of general networks.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3, 115–l34.
Sigmund, O. (2001). “A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 21(2), 120–127.
Sigmund, O., and Maute, K. (2013). “Topology optimization approaches: A comparative review.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 48(6), 1031–1055.
Spillers, W. R., and MacBain, K. M. (2009). Structural optimization, Springer, New York.
Zordan, T., Briseghella, B., and Mazzarolo, E. (2010). “Bridge structural optimization through step-by-step evolutionary process.” Struct. Eng. Int., 20(1), 72–78.
Zordan, T., et al. (2014). “Optimization of Calatrava bridge in Venice.” Proc., 7th Int. Conf. of Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management (IABMAS 2014), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21 • Issue 3 • March 2016
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 1, 2014
Accepted: Jul 29, 2015
Published online: Dec 17, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: May 17, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.