Abstract
This paper presents the evaluation of an innovative low-cost small-scale prototype deck panel under monotonic and fatigue bending. This new system introduces a trapezoidal-shaped polyurethane foam core with a thermoset polyurethane resin that has a longer pot life to facilitate the infusion process. The proposed panel exhibited a higher structural performance in terms of flexural stiffness, strength, and shear stiffness. The panels consist of two glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) facings with webs of bidirectional E-glass–woven fabric that are separated by a trapezoidal-shaped low-density polyurethane foam. The GFRP panels were manufactured using a one-step vacuum-assisted resin transfer molding process. The specimens studied were constructed in the Composite Manufacturing Laboratory in the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department at Missouri University of Science and Technology. Small-scale prototype deck panels were tested both statically and dynamically in four-point bending to investigate their flexural behavior. The ultimate bearing capacity of the proposed sandwich panels was determined from compression crushing tests. In addition, the load-deflection behavior of the proposed panel was investigated under three loading conditions: compression, static flexure, and dynamic flexure. The initial failure mode for all panels was localized outward-compression skin wrinkling of the top facing. The ultimate failure was caused by local crushing of the top facing under the loading point due to excessive compressive stresses. First-order shear deformation theory was used to predict the panel deformation in the service limit state. In general, the analytical results were found to be in good agreement with the experimental findings.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and the National University Transportation Center (NUTC) at Missouri University of Science and Technology.
References
AASHTO. (2007). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, SI Units, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Abdelkarim, O., and ElGawady, M. A. (2014). “Analysis and finite element modeling of FRP-concrete-steel double-skin tubular columns.” J. Bridge Eng., B4014005.
ACI. (2008). “Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures.” 440.2R – 08, Farmington Hills, MI.
ASTM. (2008a). “ASTM standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” ASTM D3039/D3039M-08, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2008b). “ASTM standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading.” D3410/D3410M-03, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011a). “ASTM standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores.” C365/C365M-11a, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2011b). “ASTM standard test method for flexural properties of sandwich constructions.” C393/C393M-11e1, West Conshohocken, PA.
Camata, G., and Shing, P. B. (2010). “Static and fatigue load performance of a GFRP bridge deck.” Composites Part B, 41(4), 299–307.
Carlsson, L. A., and Kardomateas, G. A. (2011). Structural and failure mechanics of sandwich composites, Springer, New York.
Connolly, M., King, J., Shidaker, T., and Duncan, A. (2006). Processing and characterization of pultruded polyurethane composites, Huntsman, Polurethanes, Auburn Hills, MI.
Dawood, H., and ElGawady, M. A. (2013). “Performance-based seismic design of unbonded precast post-tensioned concrete filled GFRP tube piers.” Composites Part B, 44(1), 357–367.
ElGawady, M. A., Booker, A. J., and Dawood, H. (2010). “Seismic behavior of posttensioned concrete-filled fiber tubes.” J. Compos. Const., 616–628.
ElGawady, M. A., and Dawood, H. M. (2012). “Analysis of segmental piers consisted of concrete filled FRP tubes.” Eng. Struct., 38, 142–152.
ElGawady, M. A., and Sha’lan, A. (2011). “Seismic behavior of self-centering precast segmental bridge bents.” J. Bridge Eng., 328–339.
ETABS, CSI. (2001). Technical note transformed section moment of inertia. Composite beam design AISC-ASD89, Computers and Structures, Berkeley, CA.
Hassan, T., Reis, E. M., and Rizkalla, S. H. (2003). “Innovative 3-D FRP sandwich panels for bridge decks.” Proc., 5th Alexandria Int. Conf. on Structural and Geotechnical Engineering. Alexandria, Egypt, 20–22.
Ji, H. S., Song, W., and Ma, Z. J. (2010). “Design, test and field application of a GFRP corrugated-core sandwich bridge.” Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2814–2824.
Kirk, R. S., and Mallett, W. J. (2013). “Highway bridge conditions: Issues for Congress.” Rep. No. R43103, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC.
Murton, M. C. (1999). “Commercialization of FRP bridge decks: Lessons and challenges for Ohio’s project 100.” Proc. Int. SAMPE Symp. Exhibition, 46(I), 943–951.
Potluri, P., Kusak, E., and Reddy, T. Y. (2003). “Novel stitch-bonded sandwich composite structures.” Compos. Struct., 59(2), 251–259.
Rocca, S. V., and Nanni, A. (2005) “Mechanical characterization of sandwich structure comprised of glass fiber reinforced core: Part 1.” Composites in Construction: 3rd Int. Conf., Lyon, France, 11–13.
Shenoi, R. A., Allen, H. G., and Clark, S. D. (1997). “Cyclic creep and creep-fatigue interaction in sandwich beams.” J. Strain Anal., 32(1), 1–18.
Zi, G., Kim, B. M., Hwang, Y. K., and Lee, Y. H. (2008). “An experimental study on static behavior of a GFRP bridge deck filled with a polyurethane foam.” Compos. Struct., 82(2), 257–268.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 21 • Issue 1 • January 2016
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 7, 2014
Accepted: Dec 29, 2014
Published online: Jun 6, 2015
Discussion open until: Nov 6, 2015
Published in print: Jan 1, 2016
ASCE Technical Topics:
- Bridge decks
- Bridge tests
- Decks
- Engineering fundamentals
- Engineering materials (by type)
- Fiber reinforced polymer
- Fibers
- Field tests
- Glass fibers
- Materials engineering
- Panels (structural)
- Polymer
- Polyurethane
- Sandwich panels
- Structural engineering
- Structural members
- Structural systems
- Synthetic materials
- Tests (by type)
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.