Performance of RC Columns Affected by ASR. II: Experiments and Assessment
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper describes the structural performance and analytical methodology for large-scale column specimens with a lap splice and concentric axial loading affected by varying levels of alkali-silica reaction (ASR) under displacement-controlled monotonic loading. The lap-splice length in the specimens is typical of the Texas DOT practice for the bar size used and is conservative by code standards. The specimens with varying degrees of ASR showed no evidence of bond deterioration within the splice; had similar initial stiffness and behavior up to the first cracking; had a 25–35% increase in postcracking stiffness up to yielding; had a 5–15% increase in yield strength; and showed no overall detrimental effects on the structural response when compared with control specimens without ASR deterioration. This improved behavior can be explained by the resulting volumetric expansion of the concrete because of the ASR that engaged the longitudinal and transverse reinforcement—this is believed to have resulted in increased axial loading and better confinement of the core concrete. Analytically, a proposed step-by-step postcracking stiffness model for axially loaded members provided the best fit with the force-displacement experimental data. In addition, for specimens exhibiting ASR, increasing the axial load on the column provided a better match with the measured experimental response.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This project was conducted at Texas A&M University through the Texas Transportation Institute and was supported by the Texas DOT and the Federal Highway Administration. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the sponsors.
References
AASHTO. (2007). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2008). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary, Farmington Hills, MI.
ASTM. (2014). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” ASTM C39/C39M, West Conshohocken, PA.
Bracci, J. M., Gardoni, P., Eck, M. K., and Trejo, D. (2012). “Performance of lap splices in large-scale column specimens affected by ASR and/or DEF.” Rep. 0-5722-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX.
Eck Olave, M. K., Bracci, J. M., Gardoni, P., and Trejo, D. (2014). “Performance of RC columns affected by ASR. I: Accelerated exposure and damage.” J. Bridge Eng., 04014069.
Mattock, A. H. (1967). “Discussion of ‘Rotational capacity of hinging regions in reinforced concrete beams’ by W. G. Corley.” J. Struct. Div., 93(2), 519–522.
Naaman, A. (2004). Prestressed concrete analysis and design, 2nd Ed., Techno, Ann Arbor, MI.
Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI). (2004). PCI design handbook: Precast and prestressed concrete, Chicago.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 24, 2013
Accepted: May 19, 2014
Published online: Jun 12, 2014
Published in print: Mar 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.