Technical Papers
Jan 22, 2014

Pre-Earthquake Multi-Objective Probabilistic Retrofit Optimization of Bridge Networks Based on Sustainability

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 6

Abstract

Planning retrofit actions on bridge networks under tight budget constraints is a challenging process. Because of the uncertainties associated with this process, a probabilistic approach is necessary. In this paper, a probabilistic methodology to establish optimum pre-earthquake retrofit plans for bridge networks based on sustainability is developed. A multicriteria optimization problem is formulated to find the optimum timing of retrofit actions for bridges within a network. The sustainability of a bridge network and the total cost of retrofit actions are considered as conflicting criteria. The sustainability is quantified in terms of the expected economic losses. The uncertainties associated with seismic hazard and structural vulnerability are considered. The methodology is illustrated on an existing bridge network. Genetic algorithms are used to solve the multicriteria optimization problem. The effects of deterioration on bridge seismic performance are considered. The effects of the time horizon on the Pareto optimal solutions are also investigated.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

Support from the National Science Foundation through Grant No. CMS-0639428; the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Community and Economic Development, through the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance (PITA); and the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (Cooperative Agreement Award DTFH61-07-H-00040) is gratefully acknowledged. The opinions and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations.

References

Adams, W. M. (2006). “The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century.” Rep. of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Renowned Thinkers Meeting, The World Conservation Union, Gland, Switzerland.
Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D. M., and Koshimura, S. (2013). “Reliability of bridges under Tsunami hazard: Emphasis on the 2011 Tohoku-Oki Earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(S1), S295–S317.
Akiyama, M., Frangopol, D. M., and Suzuki, M. (2012). “Integration of the effects of airborne chlorides into reliability-based durability design of R/C structures in a marine environment.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 8(2), 125–134.
Alcorn, A. (2003). “Embodied energy and CO2 coefficients for New Zealand building materials.” Centre for Building Performance Research Rep., Centre for Building Performance Research, Victoria Univ. of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Anderson, J. G., Wesnousky, S. G., and Stirling, M. W. (1996). “Earthquake size as a function of slip rate.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 86(3), 683–690.
Basöz, N., and Mander, J. (1999). Enhancement of the Highway Transportation Lifeline Module in HAZUS, National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS), Washington, DC.
Bocchini, P., and Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “A stochastic computational framework for the joint transportation network fragility analysis and traffic flow distribution under extreme events.” Probab. Eng. Mech., 26(2), 182–193.
Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D. M., Ummenhofer, T., and Zinke, T. (2013). “Resilience and sustainability of the civil infrastructure: Towards a unified approach.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., (Jul. 1, 2013).
Brundtland, H. (1987). Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
Bucher, C., and Frangopol, D. M. (2006). “Optimization of lifetime maintenance strategies for deteriorating structures considering probabilities of violating safety, condition, and cost thresholds.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 21(1), 1–8.
Chang, L., Peng, F., Ouyang, Y., Elnashai, A. S., and Spencer, B. F. (2012). “Bridge seismic retrofit program planning to maximize postearthquake transportation network capacity.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 75–88.
Chang, S. E., Shinozuka, M., and Moore, J. E. (2000). “Probabilistic earthquake scenarios: Extending risk analysis methodologies to spatially distributed systems.” Earthquake Spectra, 16(3), 557–572.
Decò, A., and Frangopol, D. M. (2013). “Life-cycle risk assessment of spatially distributed aging bridges under seismic and traffic hazards.” Earthquake Spectra, 29(1), 127–153.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., and Saydam, D. (2013). “Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10), 1451–1467.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., and Saydam, D. (2014a). “Sustainability of bridge networks under flood-induced scour and earthquakes.” Safety, reliability, risk, and life-cycle performance of structures and infrastructures (CD-ROM), G. Deodatis, B. R. Ellingwood, and D. M. Frangopol, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., and Saydam, D. (2014b). “Sustainability of highway bridge networks under seismic hazard.” J. Earthquake Eng., 18, 41–66.
Dueñas-Osorio, L., Craig, J. I., and Goodno, B. J. (2007). “Seismic response of critical interdependent networks.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(2), 285–306.
FEMA. (2000). “Planning for a sustainable future: the link between hazard mitigation and livability.” Publication No. 364, Washington, DC.
Frangopol, D. M. (1995). “Reliability-based optimum structural design.” Chapter 16, Probabilistic structural mechanics handbook, C. Sundararajan, ed., Chapman & Hall, New York, 352–387.
Frangopol, D. M. (1999). “Life-cycle cost analysis for bridges.” Chapter 9, Bridge safety and reliability, ASCE, Reston, VA, 210–236.
Frangopol, D. M. (2011). “Life-cycle performance, management, and optimization of structural systems under uncertainty: Accomplishments and challenges.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 7(6), 389–413.
Gallivan, F., Ang-Olson, J., Papson, A., and Venner, M. (2010). “Greenhouse gas mitigation measures for transportation construction, maintenance, and operations activities.” Project 25-25, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Ghosh, J., and Padgett, J. E. (2010). “Aging considerations in the development of time dependent seismic fragility curves.” J. Struct. Eng., 1497–1511.
Kendall, A., Keoleian, G. A., and Helfand, G. E. (2008). “Integrated life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis model for concrete bridge deck applications.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 214–222.
Kim, Y. S., Spencer, B. F., and Elnashai, A. S. (2008). “Seismic loss assessment and mitigation for critical urban infrastructure systems.” Rep. No. NSEL-007, Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
Liu, C., Fan, Y., and Ordóñez, F. (2009). “A two-stage stochastic programming model for transportation network protection.” Comput. Oper. Res., 36(5), 1582–1590.
Liu, M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2006). “Optimizing bridge network maintenance management under uncertainty with conflicting criteria: Life-cycle maintenance, failure, and user costs.” J. Struct. Eng., 1835–1845.
MATLAB Global Optimization Toolbox [Computer software]. Natick, MA, MathWorks.
Nathwani, J. S., Lind, N. C., and Pandey, M. D. (2008). “The LQI standard of practice: Optimizing engineered safety with the life quality index.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 4(5), 327–334.
Neves, L. A. C., Frangopol, D. M., and Cruz, P. J. S. (2006a). “Probabilistic lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of bridge maintenance: single maintenance type.” J. Struct. Eng., 991–1005.
Neves, L. A. C., Frangopol, D. M., and Petcherdchoo, A. (2006b). “Probabilistic lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of bridge maintenance: combination of maintenance types.” J. Struct. Eng., 1821–1834.
Ochsendorf, J. A. (2005). “Sustainable engineering: The future of structural design.” Proc., Structures Congress 2005: Metropolis & Beyond, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1–9.
Okasha, N. M., and Frangopol, D. M. (2009). “Lifetime-oriented multi-objective optimization of structural maintenance considering system reliability, redundancy and life-cycle cost using GA.” Struct. Saf., 31(6), 460–474.
Saydam, D., Bocchini, P., and Frangopol, D. M. (2013). “Time-dependent risk associated with deterioration of highway bridge networks.” Eng. Struct., 54, 221–233.
Shinozuka, M., et al. (2005). “Social-economic effect of seismic retrofit implemented on bridges in Los Angeles highway network.” Rep. No. CA06-0145, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Irvine, CA.
Shinozuka, M., Murachi, Y., Dong, X., Zhou, Y., and Orlikowski, M. J. (2003). “Effect of seismic retrofit of bridges on transportation networks.” Earthquake Eng. Eng. Vib., 2(2), 169–179.
Shiraki, N., Shinozuka, M., Moore, J. E., Chang, S. E., Kameda, H., and Tanaka, S. (2007). “System risk curves: Probabilistic performance scenarios for highway networks subject to earthquake damage.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 43–54.
Sohn, J., Kim, T. J., Hewings, G. J. D., Lee, J. S., and Jang, S.-G. (2003). “Retrofit priority of transport network links under an earthquake.” J. Urban Plann. Dev., 195–210.
USGS. (2003). “Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay region: 2002–2031.” Open File Rep. 03-214, Menlo Park, CA.
Whittemore, D. (2010). “Sustainable structures for the bridge engineer.” Structure, structural sustainability, discussion of sustainability and preservation as they pertain to structural engineering, National Council of Structural Engineers Associations, Chicago, 23–25.
Zhou, Y., Banerjee, S., and Shinozuka, M. (2010). “Socio-economic effect of seismic retrofit of bridges for highway transportation networks: A pilot study.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 6(1-2), 145–157.
Zhu, B., and Frangopol, D. M. (2013). “Risk-based approach for optimum maintenance of bridges under traffic and earthquake loads.” J. Struct. Eng., 422–434.
Zinke, T., Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D. M., and Ummenhofer, T. (2013). “Combining resilience and sustainability in infrastructure projects.” Life-cycle and sustainability of civil infrastructure systems, A. Strauss, D. M. Frangopol, and K. Bergmeister, eds., CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2450–2457.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19Issue 6June 2014

History

Received: May 24, 2013
Accepted: Nov 21, 2013
Published online: Jan 22, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014
Discussion open until: Jun 22, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

You Dong, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering Research Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS Center), Lehigh Univ., 117 ATLSS Dr., Bethlehem, PA 18015-4729. E-mail: [email protected]
Dan M. Frangopol, Dist.M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor and the Fazlur R. Khan Endowed Chair of Structural Engineering and Architecture, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering Research Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS Center), Lehigh Univ., 117 ATLSS Dr., Bethlehem, PA 18015-4729 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Duygu Saydam [email protected]
Engineering Associate, Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc., 500 Penn Center Blvd., Penn Center East, Suite 100, Pittsburgh, PA 15235; formerly, Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering Research Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS Center), Lehigh Univ., 117 ATLSS Dr., Bethlehem, PA 18015-4729. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share