Technical Papers
Jul 17, 2013

Influence of Traffic Loading on the Seismic Reliability Assessment of Highway Bridge Structures

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19, Issue 3

Abstract

Traditionally, the impacts of traffic and earthquake loading have been considered independently when assessing bridge reliability. This paper presents a framework for joint seismic and live-load fragility assessment of highway bridges. Full probabilistic analyses accounting for variation in bridge parameters, ground motion, and truck load and position are proposed to develop bridge system fragility curves and to identify the critical truck position that renders the bridge most vulnerable to earthquakes. A fragility surface is derived for the critical truck position at which the failure probability is conditioned on the governing vehicle weight in addition to ground motion intensity, thus depicting the impact of truck load on bridge seismic fragility. This fragility surface is convolved with the governing vehicle weight distribution (obtained from weigh-in-motion data) and probability of truck occurrence (function of truck flow rate) to determine traffic-informed conditional seismic reliability estimates. The proposed methodology is demonstrated on a case study of a multispan continuous steel girder bridge in the central and southeastern United States. The framework can find ready extensions to assess the joint impact of earthquake and live loads for other bridges and hazard conditions and can offer a basis for deriving reliability-based load combinations consistent with emerging trends in bridge design.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Alabama DOT for their generous distribution of the weigh-in-motion data. Additionally, the support provided by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI-1234690 is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Finally, the authors are indebted to the reviewers for constructive commentary that helped improve the presentation.

References

AASHTO. (2012). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
Alipour, A., Shafei, B., and Shinozuka, M. (2013). “Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: Scour and earthquake.” J. Bridge Eng., 362–371.
ASCE. (2009). “ASCE: Infrastructure fact sheet.” 〈http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/sites/default/files/RC2009_bridges.pdf〉 (Mar. 21, 2012).
Basoz, N., and Kiremidjian, A. S. (1998). “Evaluation of bridge damage data from the Loma Prieta and Northridge, California earthquakes.” Technical Rep. MCEER-98-0004, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY.
Basoz, N., and Kiremidjian, A. S. (1999). “Development of empirical fragility curves for bridges.” Optimizing post-earthquake lifeline system reliability, ASCE, Reston, VA, 693–702.
Basoz, N., and Mander, J. B. (1999). “Enhancement of the highway transportation module in HAZUS.” Rep. to National Institute of Building Sciences, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers, McGraw Hill, New York.
Caprani, C. C. (2012). “Calibration of a congestion load model for highway bridges using traffic microsimulation.” Struct. Eng. Int., 22(3), 342–348.
Chang, S. E. (2000). “Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake.” J. Transp. Geogr., 8(1), 53–65.
Choe, D.-E., Gardoni, P., Rosowsky, D., and Haukaas, T. (2009). “Seismic fragility estimates for reinforced concrete bridges subject to corrosion.” Struct. Saf., 31(4), 275–283.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. G. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187–199.
Czarnecki, A. A., and Nowak, A. S. (2007). “Reliability-based evaluation of steel girder bridges.” Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Bridge Eng., 160(1), 9–15.
DesRoches, R., Choi, E., Leon, R. T., Dyke, S. J., and Aschheim, M. (2004). “Seismic response of multiple span steel bridges in central and southeastern United States. I: As built.” J. Bridge Eng., 464–472.
Du, J. S., and Au, F. T. K. (2005). “Deterministic and reliability analysis of prestressed concrete bridge girders: Comparison of the Chinese, Hong Kong and AASHTO LRFD codes.” Struct. Saf., 27(3), 230–245.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2011a). “Federal Highway Administration bridge formula weights.” 〈http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/publications/brdg_frm_wghts/index.htm〉 (Jan. 29, 2013).
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2011b). “Federal Highway Administration vehicle classification.” 〈http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/ohpi/vehclass.htm〉 (Jan. 29, 2013).
Gardoni, P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Mosalam, K. M. (2002). “Probabilistic capacity models and fragility estimates for reinforced concrete columns based on experimental observations.” J. Eng. Mech., 1024–1038.
Ghosh, J., and Padgett, J. E. (2010). “Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves.” J. Struct. Eng., 1497–1511.
Ghosn, M., Moses, F., and Wang, J. (2003). Design of highway bridges for extreme events, National Academy, Washington, DC.
Haight, F. A. (1963). Mathematical theories of traffic flow, Academic, New York.
Kunnath, S. K., Larson, L., and Miranda, E. (2006). “Modelling considerations in probabilistic performance-based seismic evaluation: Case study of the I-880 viaduct.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 35(1), 57–75.
Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B. (2001). “Probabilistic seismic demand model for California highway bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 468–481.
Mander, J. B., Kim, D. K., Chen, S. S., and Premus, G. J. (1996). “Response of steel bridge bearings to reversed cyclic loading.” 〈https://ir.lib.buffalo.edu/xmlui/handle/10465/5686〉 (Jan. 16, 2012).
Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2009). OpenSees command language manual, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Melchers, R. E. (1999). Structural reliability analysis and prediction, Wiley, New York.
National Safety Commission. (2007). “The National Safety Commission alerts: Nation’s road infrastructure under great stress.” 〈http://alerts.nationalsafetycommission.com/2007/09/nations-road-infrastructure-under-great.php〉 (Mar. 25, 2012).
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007a). “Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and southeastern United States.” Earthq. Spectra, 23(3), 615–633.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007b). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(6), 823–839.
Nowak, A. S., and Cho, T. (2007). “Prediction of the combination of failure modes for an arch bridge system.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(12), 1561–1569.
Nowak, A. S., Park, C. H., and Casas, J. R. (2001). “Reliability analysis of prestressed concrete bridge girders: Comparison of Eurocode, Spanish Norma IAP and AASHTO LRFD.” Struct. Saf., 23(4), 331–344.
O’Brien, E. J., and Caprani, C. C. (2005). “Headway modelling for traffic load assessment of short to medium span bridges.” Struct. Eng., 83(16), 33–36.
O’Brien, E. J., and Enright, B. (2011). “Modeling same-direction two-lane traffic for bridge loading.” Struct. Saf., 33(4-5), 296–304.
OpenSees 2.4.3 [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Bridge functionality relationships for improved seismic risk assessment of transportation networks.” Earthq. Spectra, 23(1), 115–130.
Padgett, J. E., and DesRoches, R. (2009). “Retrofitted bridge fragility analysis for typical classes of multispan bridges.” Earthq. Spectra, 25(1), 117–141.
Padleckas, H. (2011). “Conventional 18-wheeler truck diagram.” 〈http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Conventional_18-wheeler_truck_diagram.svg〉 (Jul. 25, 2012).
Rix, G. J., and Fernandez, J. A. (2004). “Earthquake ground motion simulation.” 〈www.ce.gatech.edu/research/mae_ground_motion/〉 (Oct. 19, 2009).
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Kim, H.-K., and Kim, S.-H. (2000). “Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development.” J. Eng. Mech., 1287–1295.
Straub, D., and Der Kiureghian, A. (2008). “Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data.” Struct. Saf., 30(4), 320–336.
Transportation Research Board. (2003). Review of truck characteristics as factors in roadway design, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
Wen, Y. K., and Wu, C. L. (2001). “Uniform hazard ground motions for Mid-America cities.” Earthq. Spectra, 17(2), 359–384.
Wright, T., DesRoches, R., and Padgett, J. E. (2011). “Bridge seismic retrofitting practices in the central and southeastern United States.” J. Bridge Eng., 82–92.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 19Issue 3March 2014

History

Received: Feb 14, 2013
Accepted: Jul 15, 2013
Published online: Jul 17, 2013
Published in print: Mar 1, 2014
Discussion open until: May 5, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jayadipta Ghosh, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice Univ., Houston, TX 77005 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Colin C. Caprani [email protected]
Lecturer, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Monash Univ., Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; formerly, Lecturer, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin 1, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]
Jamie E. Padgett, A.M.ASCE
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice Univ., Houston, TX 77005.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share