Technical Papers
Feb 2, 2013

Seismic Fragility of a Highway Bridge in Quebec

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 11

Abstract

The seismic vulnerability of the Chemin des Dalles Bridge over Highway 55 located in Trois-Rivières (Quebec, Canada) was evaluated through fragility analysis using field- and laboratory-validated models. This approach offers an effective means to capture the uncertainties in ground-motion realizations, the demands placed on key structural components, and the capacity of the components to resist various levels of seismic excitation. A series of 180 synthetic ground-motion time histories (GMTHs) compatible with eastern Canada was used to capture the uncertainties related to the hazard. Nonlinear time history analyses were performed with these GMTHs and statistically analyzed to define the probabilistic seismic demand model for the abutments, bearings, and columns, which are the critical components. Data from the literature, coupled with sectional and damage mechanics analyses, were used to define the limit states (LSs) for these components. Bridge component and system fragility curves were used to evaluate the likely failure modes of the bridge and potential targets for retrofit, while accounting for key sources of uncertainty in the performance assessment. The results reveal the seismic vulnerability of this specific bridge and even offer insight into the seismic vulnerability of a typical multispan girder-type concrete bridge in Quebec.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for the Canadian Seismic Research Network (CSRN), the Québec Fonds pour la recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT) for the Centre d’études interuniversitaires des structures sous charges extrêmes (CEISCE), and Transports Québec. Computational resources for this work were provided by Compute Canada through the Réseau québécois de calcul de haute performance (RQCHP). Special thanks go to Nathalie Roy and Gustavo Siqueira for their collaboration on various aspects of the project.

References

AASHTO. (2007). LRFD bridge design specifications, SI units, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Atkinson, G. M. (2009). “Earthquake time histories compatible with the 2005 NBCC uniform hazard spectrum.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 36(6), 991–1000.
Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2006). Canadian highway bridge design code, CAN/CSA, Mississauga, ON, Canada, S6–S06.
Cantieni, R. (1992). “Dynamic behavior of highway bridges under the passage of heavy vehicles.” Technical Rep. 220, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Material Testing and Research, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
Cardone, D., Perrone, G., and Dolce, M. (2007). “Seismic risk assessment of highway bridges.” 1st US-Italy Seismic Bridge Workshop, Eucentre and the Centre of Research and Graduate Studies in Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology (ROSE School), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori (IUSS), Pavia, Italy.
Choi, E., DesRoches, R., and Nielson, B. (2004). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Eng. Struct., 26(2), 187–199.
Choi, E., and Jeon, J.-C. (2003). “Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zone.” KSCE J. Civ. Eng., 7(1), 41–51.
Clough, R. W., and Penzien, J. (1975). Dynamics of structures, McGraw Hill, New York.
Cornell, A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). “Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 526–533.
Crouse, C., Hushmand, B., Martin, G., and Wood, G. L. J. (1985). “Dynamic response of bridge-abutment-backfill systems.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 16(3), 468–477.
Cusson, D., and Paultre, P. (1995). “Stress-strain model for confined high-strength concrete.” J. Struct. Eng., 121(3), 468–477.
D’Aoust, I. (1995). “Experimental study of dynamic behavior of bridges: Cases of eight bridges tested in quebec.” M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
FEMA. (2003). Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology: Earthquake model. HAZUS-MH MR3 technical manual, FEMA, Washington, DC.
Hwang, H., Jernigan, J. B., and Lin, Y.-W. (2000). “Evaluation of seismic damage to memphis bridges and highway systems.” J. Bridge Eng., 5(4), 322–330.
Hwang, H. M., Liu, J. B., and Chiu, Y.-H. (2001). “Seismic fragility analysis of highway bridges.” MAEC Rep. 01-06, Center for Earthquake Research and Information, Univ. of Memphis, Memphis, TN.
LaBorderie, C. (1991). “Unilateral phenomena in damagable material: Modeling and application to the analysis of concrete structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. de Paris, Laboratoire de Mécanique et de Technologie, Cachan, France.
Lupoi, A., Franchin, P., and Pinto, P. E. (2007). “Further probing of the suitability of push-over analysis for the seismic assessment of bridge structures.” 1st US-Italy Seismic Bridge Workshop, Eucentre and the Centre of Research and Graduate Studies in Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology (ROSE School), Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori (IUSS), Pavia, Italy, and Federal Highway Administration, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, and National Science Foundation.
Mackie, K., and Stojadinovic, B. (2003). “Seismic demands for performance-based design of bridges.” PEER Rep. 2003/16, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Mazonni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M. H., and Fenves, G. L. (2006). “OpenSees command language manual.” 〈http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/manuals/usermanual〉 (Jan. 1, 2013).
National Research Council of Canada (NRCC). (2010). National building code of Canada 2010, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Newmark, N. M., and Rosenblueth, E. (1971). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering. Civil engineering and engineering mechanics series, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Nielson, B. G. (2005). “Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2007). “Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(6), 823–839.
Osorio, L. I. (2008). “Behavior of synthetic fiber-reinforced concrete circular columns under cyclic flexure and constant axial load.” M.Sc. dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Padgett, J. E. (2007). “Seismic vulnerability assessment of retrofitted bridges using probabilistic methods.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
Padgett, J. E., Nielson, B., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 37(5), 711–725.
Paultre, P. (2000). WMNPhi, P & P Engineering., Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Rowe, K. (2001). Geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering handbook, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Roy, N., Paultre, P., and Proulx, J. (2010). “Performance-based seismic retrofit of a bridge bent: Design and experimental validation.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 37(3), 367–379.
Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T. (2000). “Statistical analysis of fragility curves.” J. Eng. Mech., 126(12), 1224–1231.
Shome, N., Cornell, C. A., Bazzurro, P., and Carballo, J. E. (1998). “Earthquakes, records, and nonlinear responses.” Earthq. Spectra, 14(3), 469–500.
Structural Vibration Solution (SVS). (2005). ARTeMIS extractor pro release 3.1, Structural Vibration Solution, Aalborg, Denmark.
Tavares, D. H., Cardona, L. I., and Paultre, P. (2010). “Bridge reinforced concrete column limit state definition.” Anais do 52 Congresso Brasileiro do Concreto CBC2010, Ibracon, Sao Paolo, Brazil.
Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A. (2002). “Incremental dynamic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 31(3), 491–514.
Wilson, J., and Tan, B. (1990). “Bridge abutments: Formulation of simple model for earthquake response analysis.” J. Eng. Mech., 116(8), 1828–1837.
Wilson, J. C. (1988). “Stiffness of non-skew monolithic bridge abutments for seismic analysis.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 16(6), 867–883.
Yi, J.-H., Kim, S.-H., and Kushiyama, S. (2007). “Pdf interpolation technique for seismic fragility analysis of bridges.” Eng. Struct., 29(7), 1312–1322.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18Issue 11November 2013
Pages: 1131 - 1139

History

Received: Sep 2, 2011
Accepted: Jan 23, 2013
Published online: Feb 2, 2013
Published in print: Nov 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

D. H. Tavares
Structural Engineer, Intertechne, Av. João Gualberto, 1259 Curitiba, CEP 80030-001, Parana, Brazil.
J. R. Suescun
Structural Engineer, BPR Inc., 2100 King St. West, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1J 2E8.
P. Paultre, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada J1K 2R1 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
J. E. Padgett, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Rice Univ., Houston, TX 77005-1827.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share