Structural GFRP Permanent Forms with T-Shape Ribs for Bridge Decks Supported by Precast Concrete Girders
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 9
Abstract
A new concrete bridge deck cast onto glass fiber–reinforced polymer (GFRP) stay-in-place (SIP) structural forms is studied. The forms, which replace the bottom layer of conventional rebar, are essentially flat plates with T-up ribs. They span between support girders spaced at 1,772 mm and are lap-spliced using adhesive and mechanical fasteners. Special attention was given to the detailing of monolithic connections between the deck and girders to simulate continuity. The flange of the supporting concrete girders had a rough surface finish and protruded steel stirrups and mimicked AASHTO Type III girders. Five full-scale decks were tested to (1) compare the novel system with a conventional RC deck, (2) examine the effect of eliminating a top layer of orthogonal GFRP rebar, (3) assess a practice commonly used in bridge deck tests of using simple spans resting on neoprene pads, neglecting connection to girders, and (4) examine a commercially available all-GFRP deck, using the same GFRP panels but with a top GFRP plate fastened to the T-up ribs. Four auxiliary flexural specimens were tested to examine the lap-splice. The concrete deck with GFRP SIP form showed 33% higher strength than the conventional RC deck. It also achieved a peak load 7.8 times higher than the service load plus impact. Deflection under the service load was less than span/1,600. Remarkable deformability and pseudoductility was achieved at ultimate load, beyond punching shear, because of the progressive failure of the lap-splice. The simply supported deck failed at a slightly lower strength than the monolithically cast one but had a much lower stiffness.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge financial support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs program. The authors are also grateful for the valuable assistance provided by Dave Tryon and William VanRuyven at Queen’s University.
References
Alagusundaramoorthy, P., Harik, I. E., and Choo, C. C. (2006). “Structural behavior of FRP composite bridge deck panels.” J. Bridge Eng., 11(4), 384–393.
ASTM. (2008). “Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.” D3039/D3039M, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010a). “Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C39/C39M, West Conshohocken, PA.
ASTM. (2010b). “Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products.” A370, West Conshohocken, PA.
Berg, A. C., Bank, L. C., Oliva, M. G., and Russell, J. S. (2006). “Construction and cost analysis of an FRP reinforced concrete bridge deck.” Construct. Build. Mater., 20(8), 515–526.
Canadian Standards Association. (2006). “Canadian highway bridge design code.” CAN/CSA-S6-06, Mississauga, Canada, 367–371.
Dieter, D. A., Dietsche, J. S., Bank, L. C., Oliva, M. G., and Russell, J. S. (2002). “Concrete bridge decks constructed with fiber-reinforced polymer stay-in-place forms and grid reinforcing.” Transportation Research Record 1814, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 219–226.
Fam, A., and Nelson, M. (2012). “New bridge deck cast onto corrugated GFRP stay-in-place structural forms with interlocking connections.” J. Compos. Constr., 16(1), 110–117.
Grace, N., Hanson, J. L., and AbdelMessih, H. I. (2004). “Inspection and deterioration of bridge decks constructed using stay-in-place metal forms and epoxy-coated reinforcement.” 〈http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cenv_fac/138/〉 (Nov. 1, 2010).
Hall, J. E., and Mottram, J. T. (1998). “Combined FRP reinforcement and permanent formwork for concrete members.” J. Compos. Constr., 2(2), 78–86.
Honickman, H., and Fam, A. (2009). “Investigating a structural form system for concrete girders using commercially available GFRP sheet-pile sections.” J. Compos. Constr., 13(5), 455–465.
Honickman, H., Nelson, M., and Fam, A. (2009). “Investigation into the bond of glass fibre-reinforced polymer stay-in-place structural forms to concrete for decking applications.” Transportation Research Record 2131, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 134–144.
Hota, G. V. S., and Hota, S. R. V. (2002). “Advances in fibre reinforced polymer composite bridge decks.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 4(2), 161–168.
Kluge, R. W., and Sawyer, H. A. (1975). “Interacting pretensioned concrete form panels for bridge decks.” PCI J., 20(3), 34–61.
Matta, F., Nanni, A., Ringelstetter, T. E., and Bank, L. C. (2006). “Rapid construction of concrete bridge deck using prefabricated FRP reinforcement.” Proc., Third Int. Conf. on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering (CICE 2006), Florida International Univ., Miami, 151–154.
Prestressed Concrete Institute. (2001). “Stay-in-place deck panels.” Chapter 16.2, PCI bridge design manual, Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago.
Reising, R. M. W., Shahrooz, B. M., Hunt, V., Neumann, A. R., and Helmicki, A. J. (2004). “Performance comparison of four fiber-reinforced polymer deck panels.” J. Compos. Constr., 8(3), 265–274.
Saiedi, R., Fam, A., and Green, M. (2011). “Behavior of CFRP-prestressed concrete beams under high-cycle fatigue at low temperature.” J. Compos. Constr., 15(4), 482–491.
Taly, N. (1998). Design of modern highway bridges, McGraw Hill, New York.
Won, J.-P., Park, C.-G., Kim, H.-H., Lee, S.-W., and Jang, C.-I. (2008). “Effects of fibers on the bonds between FRP reinforcing bars and high-strength concrete.” Composites Part B, 39(5), 747–755.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 21, 2011
Accepted: May 22, 2012
Published online: May 24, 2012
Published in print: Sep 1, 2013
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.