Technical Papers
Apr 20, 2012

Effect of Shear Stud Connections on Dynamic Response of an FRP Deck Bridge under Moving Loads

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 7

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of shear stud connections on the dynamic response of the fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) deck system under moving loads. A FRP deck bridge in Pennsylvania was studied based on a field test and finite-element (FE) analysis. In the field test, the strain of each steel girder at the midspan was measured at three positions: top, midheight, and bottom. In the FE analysis, the connection between the steel girders and the FRP deck was simulated as fully and partially composite, separately. Static performance under a simplified truck load was investigated based on these two FE models, and the FE analysis results were compared with the field test results to validate the FE models. The FE results of the fully composite model and the partially composite model provide a lower bound and an upper bound for the real response of the FRP deck system. Next, the dynamic behavior of the FRP deck system under moving loads was studied based on the two verified FE models. The static or dynamic response in the partially composite model of the FRP deck bridge was greater than the corresponding static or dynamic response in the fully composite model. Also, it was shown that the dynamic response in the partially composite model lags behind that in the fully composite model. Additionally, the FE analysis revealed that the number of shear stud connections affected the dynamic deflection, slip, and separation. Finally, the dynamic response of the FRP deck system was compared with that of the commonly used RC system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The financial support to the second author provided by the National Science Foundation––NSF CAREER program (CMS-0550899) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank the Center for Transportation Research (CTR) at the Univ. of Tennessee Knoxville for providing the financial support to the first author.

References

AASHTO. (1998). LRFD bridge design specifications, Washington, DC.
ABAQUS 6.11 [Computer software]. Providence, RI, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp.
Alnahhal, W., Aref, A., and Alampalli, S. (2008). “Composite behavior of hybrid FRP-concrete bridge decks on steel girders.” Compos. Struct., 84(1), 29–43.
Aluri, S., Jinka, C., and GangaRao, H. V. S. (2005). “Dynamic response of three fiber reinforced polymer composite bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 10(6), 722–730.
ANSYS 7.0 [Computer software]. Canonsburg, PA, ANSYS.
Baskar, K., Shanmugam, N. E., and Thevendran, V. (2002). “Finite-element analysis of steel-concrete composite plate girder.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(9), 1158–1168.
Chiewanichakorn, M., Aref, A. J., and Alampalli, S. (2007). “Dynamic and fatigue response of a truss bridge with fiber reinforced polymer deck.” Int. J. Fatigue, 29(8), 1475–1489.
Daly, A. F., and Cuninghame, J. R. (2006). “Performance of a fibre-reinforced polymer bridge deck under dynamic wheel loading.” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 37(8), 1180–1188.
Davalos, J. F., Chen, A., and Zou, B. (2011). “Stiffness and strength evaluations of a shear connection system for FRP bridge decks to steel girders.” J. Compos. Constr., 15(3), 441–450.
Gattesco, N. (1999). “Analytical modeling of nonlinear behavior of composite beams with deformable connection.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 52(2), 195–218.
Hag-Elsafi, O., Albers, W. F., and Alampalli, S. (2011). “Dynamic analysis of the Bentley Creek Bridge with FRP deck.” J. Bridge Eng., 17(2), 318–333.
Ji, H. S., Song, W., and Ma, Z. (2010). “Design, test and field application of a GFRP corrugated-core sandwich bridge.” Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2814–2824.
Keelor, D. C., Luo, Y., Earls, C. L., and Yulismana, W. (2004). “Service load effective compression flange width in fiber reinforced polymer deck systems acting compositely with steel stringers.” J. Compos. Constr., 8(4), 289–297.
Lam, D., and El-Lobody, E. (2005). “Behavior of headed stud shear connectors in composite beam.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(1), 96–107.
Li, L., Ma, Z., Griffey, M. E., and Oesterle, R. G. (2010). “improved longitudinal joint details in decked bulb tees for accelerated bridge construction: Concept development.” J. Bridge Eng., 15(3), 327–336.
Luo, Y., and Earls, C. L. (2003). “The composite response assessment of the steel stringer-FRP deck system in the Boyer Bridge.” Rep. No. FHWA-PA-2002-043-97-04, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
Moon, F. L., Eckel, D. A., and Gillespie, J. W. (2002). “Shear stud connections for the development of composite action between steel girders and fiber-reinforced polymer bridge decks.” J. Struct. Eng., 128(6), 762–770.
Ollgaard, J.G., Slutter, R.G., and Fisher, J.W. (1971). “Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete.” AISC Eng. J., 55–64.
Pallares, L., and Hajjar, J. F. (2009a). “Headed steel stud anchors in composite structures: Part I—Shear.” Rep. No. NSEL-013, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Pallares, L., and Hajjar, J. F. (2009b). “Headed steel stud anchors incomposite structures: Part II––Tension and interaction.” Rep. No. NSEL-014, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Park, K. T., Kim, S. H., Lee, Y. H., and Hwang, Y. K. (2006). “Degree of composite action verification of bolted GFRP bridge deck-to-girder connection system.” Compos. Struct., 72(3), 393–400.
Queiroz, F. D., Vellasco, P. C. G. S., and Nethercot, D. A. (2007). “Finite element modeling of composite beams with full and partial shear connection.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 63(4), 505–521.
Schollmayer, M., and Keller, T. (2009). “Modeling of through-thickness stress state in adhesive joints connecting pultruded FRP bridge decks and steel girders.” Compos. Struct., 90(1), 67–75.
Slutter, R. G., and Fisher, J. W. (1965). “Tentative design procedure for shear connectors in composite beams.” Fritz Engineering Laboratory Report No. 316.1A, Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, PA.
Xue, W., Ding, M., Wang, H., and Luo, Z. (2008). “Static behavior and theoretical model of stud shear connectors.” J. Bridge Eng., 13(6), 623–634.
Zhang, Y., and Cai, C. S. (2007). “Load distribution and dynamic response of multi-girder bridges with FRP decks.” Eng. Struct., 29(8), 1676–1689.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18Issue 7July 2013
Pages: 644 - 652

History

Received: Nov 6, 2011
Accepted: Apr 18, 2012
Published online: Apr 20, 2012
Published in print: Jul 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xin Jiang
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-2010.
Zhongguo John Ma, F.ASCE [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-2010 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Jing Song
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-2010.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share