Technical Papers
Nov 19, 2011

Response of Seismic-Isolated Bridges in Relation to Intensity Measures of Ordinary and Pulselike Ground Motions

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18, Issue 3

Abstract

This study concentrates on the efficiency of numerous ground motion intensity measures (IMs) to be used in estimating the response of seismic-isolated bridges (SIBs). Efficiency of commonly used IMs was investigated through their correlation with maximum isolator displacement (MID) obtained from nonlinear dynamic analyses. Two sets of ground motions (GMs), classified as ordinary and pulse-like, were used in nonlinear dynamic analyses of SIBs. In the analyses, varying isolation parameters, such as the isolation period, T, and the characteristic strength of the isolator, Qd/W, were studied. Sensitivity to varying T and Qd/W and the effect of ground motion type on the correlation of IMs with MID of SIBs were examined. To improve the correlation of existing IMs, modified IMs were proposed. The results revealed that the isolation period has a pronounced effect on the correlation of IMs with MID of SIBs, especially for pulse-like GMs. Among the investigated IMs, modified velocity spectrum intensity appears to have the strongest correlation with MID of SIBs for a wide range of isolation parameters and ground motion type.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

AASHTO. (1999). Guide specification for seismic isolation design. Washington, DC.
Akkar, S., Yazgan, U., and Gulkan, P. (2005). “Drift estimates in frame buildings subjected to near-fault ground motions.” J. Struct. Eng., 131(7), 1014–1024.
Alavi, B., and Krawinkler, H. (2004). “Behavior of moment-resisting frame structures subjected to near-fault ground motions.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 33(6), 687–706.
Applied Technology Council.(1978). “Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings.” ATC 3-06, Redwood City, CA.
Arias, A. (1970). “A measure of earthquake intensity.” Seismic design for nuclear power plants, R. J. Hansen, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 438–483.
ASCE. (2005). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE/SEI 7-05, Reston, VA.
Bommer, J. J., and Ruggeri, C. (2002). “The specification of acceleration time-histories in seismic design codes.” Eur. Earthq. Eng., 16(1), 3–17.
Dicleli, M. (2006). “Performance of seismic-isolated bridges in relation to near-fault ground-motion and isolator characteristics.” Earthq. Spectra, 22(4), 887–907.
Electrical Power Research Institute. (1988). “A criterion for determining exceedence of the operating basis earthquake.” EPRI NP-5930, Palo Alto, CA.
Fajfar, P., Vidic, T., and Fischinger, M. (1990). “A measure of earthquake motion capacity to damage medium-period structures.” Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 9(5), 236–242.
FEMA. (2003). HAZUS-MH MR1: Technical manual, Washington, DC.
Giovenale, P., Cornell, C. A., and Esteva, L. (2004). “Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 33(8), 951–979.
Günay, M. S. (2008). “An equivalent linearization procedure for seismic response prediction of MDOF systems.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, Turkey.
He, W.-L., and Agrawal, A. K. (2008). “Analytical model of ground motion pulses for the design and assessment of seismic protective systems.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(7), 1177–1188.
Housner, G. W. (1952). “Spectrum intensity of strong-motion earthquakes.” Proc., Symp. Earthq. Blast Effects Struct., Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA, 20–36.
Luco, N., and Cornell, C. A. (2007). “Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions.” Earthq. Spectra, 23(2), 357–392.
Mackie, K. R., and Stojadinovic, B. (2005). “Fragility basis for California highway overpass bridge seismic decision making.” PEER Rep. 2005/12, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
Mehanny, S. S. F. (2009). “A broad-range power-law form scalar-based seismic intensity measure.” Eng. Struct., 31(7), 1354–1368.
Narasimhan, S., Wang, M., and Pandey, M. (2009). “Principal component analysis for predicting the response of nonlinear base-isolated buildings.” Earthq. Spectra, 25(1), 93–115.
OpenSees, 2.1.0 [Computer software]. Berkeley, CA, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
Ozdemir, G., Avsar, O., and Bayhan, B. (2011). “Change in response of bridges isolated with LRBs due to lead core heating.” Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(7), 921–929.
Padgett, J. E., Nielson, B. G., and DesRoches, R. (2008). “Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 37(5), 711–725.
Park, Y. J., Ang, A. H.-S., and Wen, Y. K. (1985). “Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings.” J. Struct. Eng., 111(4), 740–757.
Riddell, R. (2007). “On ground motion intensity indices.” Earthq. Spectra, 23(1), 147–173.
Riddell, R., and Garcia, J. (2001). “Hysteretic energy spectrum and damage control.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 30(12), 1791–1816.
Tang, Y., and Zhang, J. (2011). “Response spectrum-oriented pulse identification and magnitude scaling of forward directivity pulses in near-fault ground motions.” Soil. Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 31(1), 59–76.
Tothong, P., and Cornell, C. A. (2008). “Structural performance assessment under near-source pulse-like ground motions using advanced ground motion intensity measures.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 37(7), 1013–1037.
Tothong, P., and Luco, N. (2007). “Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 36(13), 1837–1860.
Trifunac, M. D., and Brady, A. G. (1975). “A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion.” Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 65(3), 581–626.
Von Thun, J. L., Roehm, L. H., Scott, G. A., and Wilson, J. A. (1988). “Earthquake ground motions for design and analysis of dams.” Proc., Earthq. Eng. Soil Dynam. II—Rec. Adv. Ground Motion Eval., Vol. 20, ASCE, Reston, VA, 463–481.
Warn, G. P., and Whittaker, A. S. (2004). “Performance estimates in seismically isolated bridge structures.” Eng. Struct., 26(9), 1261–1278.
Yakut, A., and Yilmaz, H. (2008). “Correlation of deformation demands with ground motion intensity.” J. Struct. Eng., 134(12), 1818–1828.
Yang, D., Pan, J., and Li, G. (2009). “Non-structure-specific intensity measure parameters and characteristic period of near-fault ground motions.” Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 38(11), 1257–1280.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 18Issue 3March 2013
Pages: 250 - 260

History

Received: Jun 30, 2011
Accepted: Nov 17, 2011
Published online: Nov 19, 2011
Published in print: Mar 1, 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Özgür Avşar, Ph.D. [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Anadolu Univ., İki Eylül Kampüsü, Eskişehir 26555, Turkey (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Gökhan Özdemir, Ph.D. [email protected]
Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kocaeli Univ., Umuttepe Yerleşkesi, Kocaeli 41380, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share