Retrofitting Short-Span Precast Channel Beam Bridges Constructed without Shear Reinforcement
Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 16, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper investigates retrofitting precast, nonprestressed, channel beams (PCB) used in short-span bridges to improve beam shear strength and, consequently, beam ductility. Three retrofit approaches were investigated: applying carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips, applying an epoxy spray-on, and retrofitting by installing shear bars within the stems of the precast channel beam. Implanting shear bars into each precast channel beam stem was found to be the optimal retrofit based on improved beam strength, installation ease, and economics. The suitability of the shear bar retrofit was further explored by implementing the shear bar retrofit at a short-span precast channel beam bridge. Precast channel beam sections cast without shear reinforcement were used to construct Arkansas Bridge #02992 over the Flat Hollow Branch Creek. The bridge was constructed in 1955, but several of the beams used in the original construction have since been replaced with better-condition similar-style beams. The bridge is made up of four simple spans. Each span consists of 5.79-m (19-ft) precast channel beams cast without shear reinforcement. Five interior beams along with two exterior beams were placed side-by-side to develop the 7.62-m (25-ft) overall bridge cross section. Each interior beam has a width of 1.07 m (3 ft-6 in.), and each exterior beam has a width of 1.14 m (3 ft-9 in.). The exterior beams are slightly wider than the interior beams to incorporate the roadway curb within the cross section. During the implementation study, live-load distribution and dynamic-load amplification for a precast channel beam bridge were investigated.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD) during this study. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein are those of the writers and not necessarily those of the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department. The writers would also like to acknowledge the contributions of University of Arkansas Master Scientific Research Technologist Mark Kuss, Jessie X. Jones, Keith D. Tencleve, and Jarrod Burns.
References
AASHTO. (2008). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications, 4th Ed., Washington, DC.
Alkhrdaji, T. (2002). “Strengthening highway bridges with CFRP composites.” Concrete Repair Bulletin, 15(3), 12–15.
Arkansas State Highway Commission. (1952). “Standard design: Precast concrete bridges.” Little Rock, AR.
ASTM. (2001). “Test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.” C39/C39M, West Conshohocken, PA.
Banthia, N., and Boyd, A. (2000). “Sprayed fibre-reinforced polymers for repair.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 27(5), 907–915.
Banthia, N., Nandakumar, N., and Boyd, A. (2002). “Sprayed fiber-reinforced polymers: From laboratory to a real bridge.” Concr. Int., 24(11), 47–52.
Durham, S. A., Heymsfield, E., Kuss, M., Jones, J. X., and Tencleve, K. D. (2005). “The structural evaluation of precast concrete slab panels in bridge superstructures, Phase II.” AHTD TRC 0401, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department.
El-Hacha, R., and Rizkalla, S. (2002). “Fundamental material properties of MMFX steel rebars.” Research Rep. No. 02–04, North Carolina State Univ.–Constructed Facilities Laboratory, Raleigh, NC.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (1988). “Recording and coding guide for the structure inventory and appraisal of the nation’s bridges.” Rep. No. FHWA-ED-89-044, OMB No. 2125, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Washington, DC.
Heymsfield, E., Durham, S. A., and Jones, J. X. (2007). “Structural behavior of short span precast channel beam bridges without shear reinforcement.” J. Bridge Eng., 12(6), 794–800.
Jones, J. X. (2003). “Fiber reinforced polymer shear strengthening of short span precast concrete channel beams.” M.S. thesis.
Jones, J. X., Heymsfield, E., and Durham, S. A. (2004). “Probabilistic approach for fiber reinforced polymer shear strengthening of short span precast channel beams in bridge superstructures.” Design of Structures 2004 No. 1892, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 56–65.
Klaiber, F. W., Wipf, T. J., Nahra, M. J., Ingersoll, J. S., Sardo, A. G., and Qin, S. (2001). Field and laboratory evaluation of precast concrete bridges, Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa.
Stallings, J., Tedesco, J., El-Mihilmy, M., and McCauley, M. (2000). “Field performance of FRP bridge repairs.” J. Bridge Eng., 5(2), 107–113.
Valerio, P., and Ibell, T. (2003). “Shear strengthening of existing concrete bridges.” Proc., ICE Journal of Structures and Buildings, 156(1), 75–84.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 16 • Issue 3 • May 2011
Pages: 445 - 452
Copyright
© 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Dec 18, 2009
Accepted: Aug 19, 2010
Published online: Aug 31, 2010
Published in print: May 1, 2011
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.