TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 12, 2009

Dynamic Performance Simulation of Long-Span Bridge under Combined Loads of Stochastic Traffic and Wind

Publication: Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 15, Issue 3

Abstract

Slender long-span bridges exhibit unique features which are not present in short and medium-span bridges such as higher traffic volume, simultaneous presence of multiple vehicles, and sensitivity to wind load. For typical buffeting studies of long-span bridges under wind turbulence, no traffic load was typically considered simultaneously with wind. Recent bridge/vehicle/wind interaction studies highlighted the importance of predicting the bridge dynamic behavior by considering the bridge, the actual traffic load, and wind as a whole coupled system. Existent studies of bridge/vehicle/wind interaction analysis, however, considered only one or several vehicles distributed in an assumed (usually uniform) pattern on the bridge. For long-span bridges which have a high probability of the presence of multiple vehicles including several heavy trucks at a time, such an assumption differs significantly from reality. A new “semideterministic” bridge dynamic analytical model is proposed which considers dynamic interactions between the bridge, wind, and stochastic “real” traffic by integrating the equivalent dynamic wheel load (EDWL) approach and the cellular automaton (CA) traffic flow simulation. As a result of adopting the new analytical model, the long-span bridge dynamic behavior can be statistically predicted with a more realistic and adaptive consideration of combined loads of traffic and wind. A prototype slender cable-stayed bridge is numerically studied with the proposed model. In addition to slender long-span bridges which are sensitive to wind, the proposed model also offers a general approach for other conventional long-span bridges as well as roadway pavements to achieve a more realistic understanding of the structural performance under probabilistic traffic and dynamic interactions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The research was partially supported by NSF Grant No. NSFCMMI-0900253 and the U.S. Department of Transportation UTC program through Mountain-Plains Consortium (MPC). Opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed are those of the writers and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsors.

References

AASHTO. (2004). LRFD bridge design specifications, AASHTO, Washington, D.C.
ASCE. (2003). “Assessment of performance of vital long-span bridges in the United States.” ASCE subcommittee on performance of bridges, R. J. Kratky, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va.
Baker, C. J. (1991). “Ground vehicles in high cross winds. Part I: Unsteady aerodynamic forces.” J. Fluids Struct., 5, 91–111.
Cai, C. S., and Chen, S. R. (2004). “Framework of vehicle-bridge-wind dynamic analysis.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 92(7–8), 579–607.
Calcada, R., Cunha, A., and Delgado, R. (2005). “Analysis of traffic-induced vibrations in a cable-stayed bridge. Part II: Numerical modeling and stochastic simulation.” J. Bridge Eng., 10(4), 386–397.
Chen, S. R. (2004). “Dynamic performance of bridges and vehicles under strong wind.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge.
Chen, S. R., and Cai, C. S. (2006). “Unified approach to predict the dynamic performance of transportation system considering wind effects.” Struct. Eng. Mech., 23(3), 279–292.
Chen, S. R., and Cai, C. S. (2007). “Equivalent wheel load approach for slender cable-stayed bridge fatigue assessment under traffic and wind: Feasibility study.” J. Bridge Eng., 12(6), 755–764.
Chen, S. R., Cai, C. S., and Levitan, M. (2007). “Understand and improve dynamic performance of transportation system—A case study of Luling Bridge.” Eng. Struct., 29, 1043–1051.
Chen, Y. B., and Feng, M. Q. (2006). “Modeling of traffic excitation for system identification of bridge structures.” Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng., 21, 57–66.
Ditlevsen, O. (1994). “Traffic loads on large bridges modeled as white-noise fields.” J. Eng. Mech., 120(4), 681–694.
Ditlevsen, O., and Madsen, H. O. (1994). “Stochastic vehicle-queue-load model for large bridges.” J. Eng. Mech., 120(9), 1829–1874.
Huang, D. (2005). “Dynamic and impact behavior of half-through arch bridges.” J. Bridge Eng., 10(2), 133–141.
Huang, D. Z., and Wang, T. L. (1992). “Impact analysis of cable-stayed bridges.” Comput. Struct., 31, 175–183.
Jain, A., Jones, N. P., and Scanlan, R. H. (1996). “Coupled aeroelastic and aerodynamic response analysis of long-span bridges.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 60(1–3), 69–80.
Li, X. G., Jia, B., Gao, Z. Y., and Jiang, R. (2006). “A realistic two-lane cellular automata traffic model considering aggressive lane-changing behavior of fast vehicle.” Physica A, 367, 479–486.
Los Alamos National Laboratory. (1996). “Transportation analysis and simulation system.” TRANSIMS Travelogues, ⟨http://www-transims.tsasa.lanl.gov/travel.shtml⟩ (April 30, 2008).
Moses, F. (2001). “Calibration of load factors for LRFR bridge.” NCHRP Rep. No. 454, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
Nagel, K., and Schreckenberg, M. (1992). “A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic.” J. Phys. (France), 2(12), 2221–2229.
National Research Council. (2000). Highway capacity manual, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.
Nowak, A. S. (1993). “Live load models for highway bridges.” Struct. Safety, 13, 53–66.
O’Connor, A., and O’Brien, E. (2005). “Mathematical traffic load modeling and factors influencing the accuracy of predicted extremes.” Can. J. Civ. Eng., 32(1), 270–278.
Pines, D., and Aktan, A. E. (2002). “Status of structural health monitoring of long-span bridges in the United States.” Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 4(4), 372–380.
Rickert, M., Nagel, K., Schreckenberg, M., and Latour, A. (1996). “Two lane traffic simulations using cellular automata.” Physica A, 231, 534–550.
Schadschneider, A. (2006). “Cellular automata models of highway traffic.” Physica A, 372, 142–150.
Shafizadeh, K., and Mannering, F. (2006). “Statistical modeling of user perceptions of infrastructure condition: Application to the case of highway roughness.” J. Transp. Eng., 132(2), 133–140.
Simiu, E., and Scanlan, R. H. (1996). Wind effects on structures—Fundamentals and applications to design, 3rd Ed., Wiley, New York.
Transportation Research Board (TRB). (2007). “The domain of truck and bus safety research.” Transportation Research Circular No. E-C117, The National Academies, Washington, D.C.
Wu, J., and Chen, S. R. (2008). “Traffic flow simulation based on cellular automaton model for interaction analysis between long-span bridge and traffic.” Inaugural Int. Conf. of the Engineering Mechanics Institute (EM08).
Xu, Y. L., and Guo, W. H. (2003). “Dynamic analysis of coupled road vehicle and cable-stayed bridge system under turbulent wind.” Eng. Struct., 25, 473–486.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Bridge Engineering
Journal of Bridge Engineering
Volume 15Issue 3May 2010
Pages: 219 - 230

History

Received: Dec 5, 2008
Accepted: Aug 29, 2009
Published online: Oct 12, 2009
Published in print: May 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

S. R. Chen, M.ASCE [email protected]
P.E.
Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
J. Wu, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share