Technical Papers
Sep 28, 2022

Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis of Closure Parameters of Transition Models

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36, Issue 1

Abstract

The closure parameters introduced in transition models can compromise the accuracy of prediction results. This paper investigated the uncertainty caused by the closure parameters in transition models (γ and kωγ), and identified the key parameters that have the greatest impact on quantities of interest. The uncertainty was propagated by the point-collocation no-intrusive polynomial chaos method, and the relative contribution of each parameter to uncertainty was assessed by the Sobol index. The natural transition flow (Schubauer–Klebanoff flat plate) and low-velocity airfoil flow (NLF0416 airfoil) were chosen for computational cases. The results, which are highly dependent on the closure parameters, validate the necessity of uncertainty research. The parameters of the kωγ model are more sensitive than those of the γ model. In the γ model, the most critical parameter is CTU2, which is negatively related to the transition position, i.e., the transition delays when CTU2 increases and advances when CTU2 decreases. In the kωγ model, the most critical parameter is C2, which is positively related to the transition position.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Numerical Wind Tunnel Project (No. NNW2019ZT1-A03) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11721202).

References

Cheung, S. H., T. A. Oliver, E. E. Prudencio, S. Prudhomme, and R. D. Moser. 2011. “Bayesian uncertainty analysis with applications to turbulence modeling.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (9): 1137–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.013.
De Santis, C., P. Catalano, and R. Tognaccini. 2022. “Model for enhancing turbulent production in laminar separation bubbles.” AIAA J. 60 (1): 473–487. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060883.
Dick, E., and S. Kubacki. 2017. “Transition models for turbomachinery boundary layer flows: A review.” Int. J. Turbomach. Propul. Power 2 (2): 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp2020004.
Dunn, M. C., B. Shotorban, and A. Frendi. 2011. “Uncertainty quantification of turbulence model coefficients via Latin hypercube sampling method.” J. Fluids Eng. 133 (4): 1. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003762.
Duraisamy, K., G. Iaccarino, and H. Xiao. 2019. “Turbulence modeling in the age of data.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51 (8): 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010518-040547.
Durbin, P. A. 2018. “Some recent developments in turbulence closure modeling.” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50 (1): 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-045020.
Edeling, W. N., P. Cinnella, R. P. Dwight, and H. Bijl. 2014. “Bayesian estimates of parameter variability in the kε turbulence model.” J. Comput. Phys. 258 (10): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.10.027.
Emory, M., J. Larsson, and G. Iaccarino. 2013. “Modeling of structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes closures.” Phys. Fluids 25 (11): 110822. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4824659.
Emory, M., R. Pecnik, and G. Iaccarino. 2011. “Modeling structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged computations of shock/boundary layer interactions.” In Proc., 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Fu, S., and L. Wang. 2013. “RANS modeling of high-speed aerodynamic flow transition with consideration of stability theory.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 58 (Apr): 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.004.
Glasserman, P. 2004. Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering. Berlin: Springer.
Godfrey, A., and E. Cliff. 2001. “Sensitivity equations for turbulent flows.” In Proc., 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Hosder, S., R. W. Walters, and M. Balch. 2007. “Efficient sampling for non-intrusive polynomial chaos applications with multiple uncertain input variables.” In Proc., 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Hosder, S., R. W. Walters, and M. Balch. 2010. “Point-collocation nonintrusive polynomial chaos method for stochastic computational fluid dynamics.” AIAA J. 48 (12): 2721–2730. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39389.
Juntasaro, E., K. Ngiamsoongnirn, P. Thawornsathit, and K. Suga. 2021. “Development of an analytical wall function for bypass transition.” Fluids 6 (9): 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6090328.
Langtry, R. B., and F. R. Menter. 2009. “Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes.” AIAA J. 47 (12): 2894–2906. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42362.
Li, J., S. Chen, F. Cai, and C. Yan. 2020. “Numerical investigation of vented plume into a supersonic flow in the early stage of rocket hot separation.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 107 (20): 106249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106249.
Li, Y., J. Xu, L. Qiao, Y. Zhang, and J. Bai. 2022a. “A Galilean invariant variable–based RANS closure model for bypass and laminar separation bubble-induced transition.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 35 (3): 04022027. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001427.
Li, Y., J. Xu, Y. Zhang, and J. Bai. 2022b. “Surface roughness effects on unsteady transition property over a pitching airfoil.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 35 (3): 04022010. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001404.
Liu, Z., Y. Lu, and C. Yan. 2021. “Uncertainty analysis of inflow parameters for mid-lift-to-drag vehicle transition.” AIAA J. 2021 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060387.
Liu, Z., C. Yan, F. Cai, J. Yu, and Y. Lu. 2020. “An improved local correlation-based intermittency transition model appropriate for high-speed flow heat transfer.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 106 (5): 106–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106122.
Lu, J., J. Li, Z. Song, W. Zhang, and C. Yan. 2022. “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of heat transfer in hypersonic three-dimensional shock waves/turbulent boundary layer interaction flows.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 123 (11): 107447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2022.107447.
Margheri, L., M. Meldi, M. V. Salvetti, and P. Sagaut. 2014. “Epistemic uncertainties in RANS model free coefficients.” Comput. Fluids 102 (6): 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.06.029.
Menter, F. R., T. Esch, and S. Kubacki. 2002. “Transition modelling based on local variables.” In Engineering turbulence modelling and experiments, 555–564. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Menter, F. R., R. B. Langtry, S. R. Likki, Y. B. Suzen, P. G. Huang, and S. Volker. 2006a. “A correlation-based transition model using local variables—Part 1: Model formulation.” J. Turbomach. 128 (3): 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2184352.
Menter, F. R., R. B. Langtry, S. R. Likki, Y. B. Suzen, P. G. Huang, and S. Volker. 2006b. “A correlation-based transition model using local variables—Part 2: Test cases and industrial applications.” J. Turbomach. 128 (3): 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2184353.
Menter, F. R., R. B. Langtry, and S. Völker. 2006c. “Transition modelling for general purpose CFD codes.” Flow Turbulence Combust. 77 (1–4): 207–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-006-9047-1.
Menter, F. R., P. E. Smirnov, and T. Liu. 2015. “A one-equation local correlation-based transition model.” Flow Turbulence Combust. 95 (4): 583–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-015-9622-4.
Platteeuw, P., G. Loeven, and H. Bijl. 2008. “Uncertainty quantification applied to the k-ε model of turbulence using the probabilistic collocation method.” In Proc., 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf. 16th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Poroseva, S. V., M. Y. Hussaini, and S. L. Woodruff. 2006. “Improving the predictive capability of turbulence models using evidence theory.” AIAA J. 44 (6): 1220–1228. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15756.
Ray, J., S. Lefantzi, S. Arunajatesan, and L. Dechant. 2016. “Bayesian parameter estimation of a model for accurate jet-in-crossflow simulations.” AIAA J. 54 (8): 2432–2448. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054758.
Ray, J., S. Lefantzi, S. Arunajatesan, and L. Dechant. 2018. “Learning an eddy viscosity model using shrinkage and Bayesian calibration: A jet-in-crossflow case study.” J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst. Part B: Mech. Eng. 4 (1): 7557. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037557.
Schaefer, J., S. Hosder, T. West, C. Rumsey, J.-R. Carlson, and W. Kleb. 2017a. “Uncertainty quantification of turbulence model closure coefficients for transonic wall-bounded flows.” AIAA J. 55 (1): 195–213. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054902.
Schaefer, J. A., A. W. Cary, M. Mani, and P. R. Spalart. 2017b. “Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of SA turbulence model coefficients in two and three dimensions.” In Proc., 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Schubauer, G. B., and P. S. Klebanoff. 1956. “Contributions on the mechanics of boundary-layer transition.” NACA Rep. 39 (26): 411–415.
Slotnick, J., A. Khodadoust, J. Alonso, D. Darmofal, W. Gropp, E. Lurie, and D. Mavriplis. 2014. “CFD vision 2030 study: A path to revolutionary computational aerosciences.” In McHenry County natural hazards mitigation plan. Rep. No. NF1676L-18332. Houston: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Somers, D. M. 1981. Design and experimental results for a flapped natural-laminar-flow airfoil for general aviation applications. Rep. No. NASA-TP-1865. Houston: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Song, Z., Z. Liu, J. Lu, and C. Yan. 2022. “Quantification of parametric uncertainty in γReθt model for typical flat plate and airfoil transition flows.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 96 (Jan): 105553.
Turgeon, É., D. Pelletier, and J. Borggaard. 2001. “Application of a sensitivity equation method to the k-epsilon model of turbulence.” In Proc., 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conf., 25–34. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Wang, G., M. Yang, Z. Xiao, and S. Fu. 2018. “Improved k-ω-γ transition model by introducing the local effects of nose bluntness for hypersonic heat transfer.” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 119 (Apr): 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.11.103.
Wang, L., and S. Fu. 2011. “Development of an intermittency equation for the modeling of the supersonic/hypersonic boundary layer flow transition.” Flow Turbulence Combust. 87 (1): 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-011-9336-1.
Wang, L., S. Fu, A. Carnarius, C. Mockett, and F. Thiele. 2012. “A modular RANS approach for modelling laminar–turbulent transition in turbomachinery flows.” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 34 (Apr): 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2012.01.008.
Warren, E. S., J. E. Harris, and H. A. Hassan. 1995. “Transition model for high-speed flow.” AIAA J. 33 (8): 1391–1397. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12687.
Warren, E. S., and H. A. Hassan. 1998. “Transition closure model for predicting transition onset.” J. Aircr. 35 (5): 769–775. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.2368.
Wiener, N. 1938. “The homogeneous chaos.” Am. J. Math. 60 (4): 897–936. https://doi.org/10.2307/2371268.
Xiao, H., and P. Cinnella. 2019. “Quantification of model uncertainty in RANS simulations: A review.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 108 (10): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.10.001.
Xiu, D., and G. E. Karniadakis. 2003. “Modeling uncertainty in flow simulations via generalized polynomial chaos.” J. Comput. Phys. 187 (1): 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00092-5.
Yang, M., and Z. Xiao. 2019. “Distributed roughness induced transition on wind-turbine airfoils simulated by four-equation k-ω-γ-Ar transition model.” Renewable Energy 135 (May): 1166–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.12.091.
Yang, M., and Z. Xiao. 2020. “Parameter uncertainty quantification for a four-equation transition model using a data assimilation approach.” Renewable Energy 158 (12): 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.05.139.
Yang, T., Y. Chen, Y. Shi, J. Hua, F. Qin, and J. Bai. 2022. “Stochastic investigation on the robustness of laminar-flow wings for flight tests.” AIAA J. 60 (4): 2266–2286. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060842.
Yang, T., H. Zhong, Y. Chen, Y. Shi, J. Bai, and F. Qin. 2021. “Transition prediction and sensitivity analysis for a natural laminar flow wing glove flight experiment.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34 (8): 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.12.042.
Zhao, Y., H. Liu, Q. Zhou, and C. Yan. 2020. “Quantification of parametric uncertainty in kωγ transition model for hypersonic flow heat transfer.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 96 (11): 105553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105553.
Zhao, Y., C. Yan, H. Liu, and Y. Qin. 2019a. “Assessment of laminar-turbulent transition models for hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator aeroshell in convection heat transfer.” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 132 (12): 825–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.11.025.
Zhou, L., R. Li, Z. Hao, D. I. Zaripov, and C. Yan. 2017. “Improved—Model for crossflow-induced transition prediction in hypersonic flow.” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 115 (Dec): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.08.013.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 36Issue 1January 2023

History

Received: Apr 19, 2022
Accepted: Jun 30, 2022
Published online: Sep 28, 2022
Published in print: Jan 1, 2023
Discussion open until: Feb 28, 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ziming Song [email protected]
Master, National Key Laboratory of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Beihang Univ., Beijing 100191, China. Email: [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, National Key Laboratory of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Beihang Univ., Beijing 100191, China. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-6666. Email: [email protected]
Professor, National Key Laboratory of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Beihang Univ., Beijing 100191, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4897-4360. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share