Abstract

Low-frequency errors are a type of testing errors commonly existing in pyroshock experiments due to the harsh mechanical environment that lead to inaccuracy and contamination of pyroshock data. It is necessary to eliminate such low-frequency errors from pyroshock data via data analysis. Two methods based on discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) are proposed, respectively, in this article. Firstly, the principle and operating process of these two methods are introduced, where four correlation coefficients are defined to determine the decomposition level for quantitative correction. Then, the two methods are applied to remove the integral zero shift from a set of pyroshock test data, respectively, and the capability and effectiveness of the two methods are compared. It is revealed from the comparison studies that both methods are capable of removing integral zero shift effectively to correct the shock response spectrum and improve the accuracy of pyroshock data. The correlation coefficients constructed here can help to realize quantitative selection of key parameters for the two methods. The DWT method shows better correction performance for extracting accurate parameters, whereas the EEMD method is more concise and convenient for application.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11902286 and 11972204).

References

Bateman, V., H. Himelblau, and R. Merritt. 2012. “Validation of pyroshock data.” J. IEST 55 (1): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.17764/jiet.55.1.2q4650xqt7j0k506.
Bement, L. J., and M. L. Schimmel. 1995. A manual for pyrotechnic design, development and qualification. Hampton, VA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Brauer, K. O. 1974. Handbook of pyrotechnics. New York: Chemical Publishing Company.
Caresta, M., R. Langley, and J. Woodhouse. 2013. “Transient response of structures with uncertain properties to nonlinear shock loading.” J. Sound Vib. 332 (22): 5821–5836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.06.014.
Chu, A. 1987. “Zeroshift of piezoelectric accelerometers in pyroshock measurements.” In Proc., 57th Shock Vibration Bull, 71–80. Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.
Daubechies, I. 1992. Ten lectures on wavelets. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Edwards, T. S. 2003. “An improved wavelet correction for zero shifted accelerometer data.” Shock Vib. 10 (3): 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1155/2003/972829.
Fugal, D. L. 2009. Conceptual wavelets in digital signal processing. New York: Space and Signals Technologies Publishing.
Gao, W., Z. Qin, and F. Chu. 2022. “Theoretical and experimental studies on pyroshock attenuation via periodic rods.” AIAA J. 60 (2): 1227–1242. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060749.
Girard, A., C. Pont, and E. Courau. 2005. “Very first results from pyroshock database for satellites.” In Proc., European Conf. on Spacecraft Structures, Materials and Mechanical Testing 2005. Paris, VA: European Space Agency.
Huang, N. E., Z. Shen, S. R. Long, M. C. Wu, H. H. Shih, Q. Zheng, N. C. Yen, C. C. Tung, and H. H. Liu. 1998. “The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis.” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 454 (3): 903–995. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193.
Hwang, D., J. Han, J. Lee, and Y. Lee. 2019. “A mathematical model for the separation behavior of a split type low-shock separation bolt.” Acta Astronaut. 164 (11): 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.07.035.
Hwang, D., H. Park, and J. Han. 2020. “Development of a miniature point source pyroshock simulator.” J. Sound Vib. 481 (9): 115438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115438.
Jiang, H., C. Li, and H. Li. 2013. “An improved EEMD with multiwavelet packet for rotating machinery multi-fault diagnosis.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 36 (2): 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.12.010.
Lee, J. R., C. C. Chia, and C. W. Kong. 2012. “Review of pyroshock wave measurement and simulation for space systems.” Measurement 45 (4): 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2011.12.011.
Li, Y., X. Liang, M. Xu, and W. Huang. 2017. “Early fault feature extraction of rolling bearing based on ICD and tunable Q-factor wavelet transform.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 86 (Oct): 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.10.013.
Li, Y., S. Wang, Y. Yang, and Z. Deng. 2022. “Multiscale symbolic fuzzy entropy: An entropy denoising method for weak feature extraction of rotating machinery.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 162 (1): 108052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108052.
Moening, C. 1985. “Pyrotechnic shock flight failures.” In Proc., 31st Annual Technical Meeting Institute of Environmental Sciences Pyrotechnic Shock Tutorial Program. Philadelphia: Citeseer.
Monti, R., and P. Gasbarri. 2017. “Dynamic load synthesis for shock numerical simulation in space structure design.” Acta Astronaut. 137 (8): 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.04.023.
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 2011. NASA-STD-7003A: Pyroshock test criteria. Washington, DC: NASA.
Smallwood, D. O. 1981. “An improved recursive formula for calculating shock response spectra.” In Proc., 51st Shock Vibration Bulletin, 211–217. Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.
Smallwood, D. O., and J. S. Cap. 1998. “Salvaging pyrotechnic data with minor overloads and offsets.” J. IEST 42 (3): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.17764/jiet.42.3.743716462116g175.
Sun, W., Y. Huang, and H. Chen. 2019. “An improved adaptive genetic algorithm for optimizing pyroshock acceleration synthesis.” IEEE Access 7 (52): 132682–132693. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2941738.
US Department of Defense. 2008. MIL-STD-810G: Environmental test methods and engineering guides. Washington, DC: MIL-STD-810G Committee.
Wang, Q., and X. Deng. 1999. “Damage detection with spatial wavelets.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 36 (23): 3443–3468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00152-8.
Wang, X., Z. Qin, J. Ding, and F. Chu. 2017. “Finite element modeling and pyroshock response analysis of separation nuts.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 68 (9): 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.05.028.
Wang, X., T. Yu, H. Yan, J. Ding, Z. Li, Z. Qin, and F. Chu. 2021. “Application of stress wave theory for pyroshock isolation at spacecraft-rocket interface.” Chin. J. Aeronaut. 34 (8): 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.04.005.
Wu, N., and Q. Wang. 2011. “Experimental studies on damage detection of beam structures with wavelet transform.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 49 (3): 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2010.12.004.
Wu, Z., and N. E. Huang. 2009. “Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: A noise-assisted data analysis method.” Adv. Adaptive Data Anal. 1 (1): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793536909000047.
Yan, H., Z. Qin, W. Zhang, A. Ming, X. Wang, and F. Chu. 2019. “Dynamic analysis of laser shock response: Experimental and numerical studies.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 94 (Sep): 105430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105430.
Yan, Y., and Q. Li. 2019. “Low-pass-filter-based shock response spectrum and the evaluation method of transmissibility between equipment and sensitive components interfaces.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 117 (2): 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.07.023.
Yan, Y., and Q. Li. 2021. “Design and implementation of net zero displacement filter for the synthesis of a mechanical shock signal under specified shock response spectrum.” Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 147 (Oct): 107105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107105.
Zhao, H., Z. Hao, W. Liu, J. Ding, Y. Sun, and Q. Zhang. 2019. “The shock environment prediction of satellite in the process of satellite-rocket separation.” Acta Astronaut. 159 (6): 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.017.
Zhao, H., W. Liu, J. Ding, Y. Sun, X. Li, and Y. Liu. 2018. “Numerical study on separation shock characteristics of pyrotechnic separation nuts.” Acta Astronaut. 151 (10): 893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.040.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 35Issue 5September 2022

History

Received: Jan 21, 2022
Accepted: Apr 8, 2022
Published online: May 27, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Oct 27, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Xixiong Wang [email protected]
Lecturer, School of Electromechanical and Automotive Engineering, Yantai Univ., Yantai 264005, China. Email: [email protected]
Master’s Student, School of Electromechanical and Automotive Engineering, Yantai Univ., Yantai 264005, China. Email: [email protected]
Engineer, School of Electromechanical and Automotive Engineering, Yantai Univ., Yantai 264005, China. Email: [email protected]
Associate Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3892-4594. Email: [email protected]
Professor, School of Electromechanical and Automotive Engineering, Yantai Univ., Yantai 264005, China. Email: [email protected]
Jifeng Ding [email protected]
Senior Engineer, Beijing Institute of Spacecraft System Engineering, Beijing 100094, China. Email: [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua Univ., Beijing 100084, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • On the Advances of Computational Nonclassical Continuum Theories of Elasticity for Bending Analyses of Small-Sized Plate-Based Structures: A Review, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 10.1007/s11831-023-09891-3, 30, 5, (2959-3029), (2023).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share