New Flow Control Techniques with Prepositioned Stationary or Vibrating Elliptical Wing at Low Speed and High Angle of Attack
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 35, Issue 5
Abstract
Strong coupling of aerodynamics and dynamic motion will occur on advanced highly maneuverable aircraft at a high angle of attack, which makes the complex flow field heavily nonlinear. To improve the aerodynamic performance at a high angle of attack and broaden the flight boundary of the aircraft, a new combination configuration of a prepositive elliptical wing–main wing is proposed. The high-energy wake vortex generated by the stationary or vibrating prepositive wing is mixed with the airflow field of the main wing at the high angle of attack, and the air flow is accelerated through the space between the elliptical wing and its main wing, thereby enhancing the ability of the boundary layer to resist separation. A two-dimensional combined configuration of a stationary or vibrating prepositive elliptical NACA0012 airfoil was designed, and the flow control simulation was studied with a high-precision computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method. The results show that the stationary elliptical wing generates lift by itself, the generated wake suppresses the flow separation on the upper wing surface of the main wing, and the lift-to-drag ratio can be increased by as much as 319%. Moreover, when the prepositive wing vibrates at a small amplitude, the generated wake energy is stronger and the control effect on the separation of the main wing is much more remarkable. In the best case, the lift-to-drag ratio of the main wing can be increased by 485%. Compared with conventional flow control techniques, the new combined flow control method has the characteristics of a simple form and a high degree of control without forming waste resistance, and significantly can improve the flow separation characteristics at high angles of attack and enhance the maneuvering ability of aircraft.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Data Availability Statement
Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
The research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. G2020KY05115) and the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi (Program No. 2021JQ-084).
References
Abbott, I. H., and A. E. von Doenhoff. 1959. “Theory of wing sections.” In General information. New York: Dover.
Brüderlin, M., M. Zimmer, N. Hosters, and M. Behr. 2017. “Numerical simulation of vortex generators on a winglet control surface.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 71 (Dec): 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.10.018.
Chen, Y., J. Nan, and J. Wu. 2017. “Wake effect on a semi-active flapping foil based energy harvester by a rotating foil.” Comput. Fluids 160 (Jan): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.10.024.
Harimi, l., and M. Saghafian. 2012. “Numerical simulation of fluid flow and forced convection heat transfer from tandem circular cylinders using overset grid method.” J. Fluids Struct. 28 (Jan): 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.12.006.
Hu, X., X. Zhang, and Y. You. 2019. “On the flow around two circular cylinders in tandem arrangement at high Reynolds numbers.” Ocean Eng. 189 (Oct): 106301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106301.
Kral, L. D. 2000. Active flow control technology. St. Louis: Washington Univ.
Ladson, C. L. 1988. Effects of independent variation of mach and Reynolds numbers on the low-speed aerodynamic characteristics of the NACA 0012 airfoil section. Mountain View, CA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration Ames Research Center.
Lei, J., J. Zhang, and J. Niu. 2020. “Effect of active oscillation of local surface on the performance of low Reynolds number airfoil.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 99 (Apr): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105774.
McCroskey, W. J. 1988. A critical assessment of wind tunnel results for the NACA 0012 airfoil., 285–330. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Rasani, M. R., M. Z. Nuawi, W. M. F. W. Mahmood, and Z. Harun. 2016. “A computational study on effect of pitch difference in pure plunging tandem wings.” Mater. Sci. Eng. Conf. Ser. 152 (1): 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/152/1/012004.
Veldhuis, L., and M. van der Steen. 2010. “Flow separation control by off surface elements.” In Proc., 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-4684.
Warkentin, J., and J. DeLaurier. 2007. “Experimental aerodynamic study of tandem flapping membrane wings.” J. Aircr. 44 (5): 1653–1661. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.28160.
Zhang, Q., and Z.-y. Ye. 2019. “Computational investigations for aerodynamic characteristic analysis of low Reynolds number doubly-tandem wing configurations.” Eng. Mech. 36 (10): 244–256.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 35 • Issue 5 • September 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Sep 7, 2021
Accepted: Feb 9, 2022
Published online: Jun 2, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 2, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Lei Wang, Zhe Li, Lihao Feng, Improvement of Poststall Performance of NACA 0015 Airfoil Using Leading-Edge Synthetic Jet Array, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-5243, 37, 2, (2024).
- Bai Xuan, Zhan Hao, Mi Baigang, New Flow Control Optimal Design Method of Flapping Wing Coupled with a Prepositive Elliptical Wing, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 10.1061/JAEEEZ.ASENG-4954, 37, 1, (2023).