Technical Papers
Apr 21, 2021

Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Staggered Rotors Octocopter Based on Surrogate Model

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 4

Abstract

Improving aerodynamic performance with limited dimensions is becoming more important in the design of multirotor aircraft. Complex coupling interactions exist between the structural parameters and aerodynamic performance of the double-layer staggered rotor octocopter. This paper develops an integrated aerostructural design optimization approach based on a surrogate model to reduce the high computation cost of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation experiments, where the surrogate model is constructed by using the Latin Hypercube design, and different approximation methods are compared. Aiming to improve the global accuracy of the surrogate model, computer-aided design (CAD) modeling and CFD simulation experiments were carried out according to the sample points designed by the Latin Hypercube method. A radial basis function surrogate model was constructed based on 63 sample points obtained with CFD simulations after comparison with other approximation methods. The optimization for aerodynamic/structural design was formulated and solved by the multiisland genetic algorithm. The results show that the surrogate model has an accurate predictive ability, and the optimal solution obtained from the optimization has a better aerodynamic performance than the samplings. Compared with the initial optimum data, the optimum solution proposed in our study could generate 102.7% more thrust, and the objective function y is improved by 105.1% according to the CFD simulation results. The approximation and optimization approach effectively reduces the cost of many CFD calculations in aircraft design and provides a global prediction for the performance of the octocopter.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the China Scholarship Council (CSC: 201906830094) and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

References

Bershadsky, D., S. Haviland, and E. N. Johnson. 2016. “Electric multirotor UAV propulsion system sizing for performance prediction and design optimization.” In Proc., 57th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0581.
Du, S., and L. Wang. 2016. “Aircraft design optimization with uncertainty based on fuzzy clustering analysis.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 29 (1): 04015032. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000517.
Frank, C. P., O. J. Pinon-Fischer, D. N. Mavris, and C. M. Tyl. 2017. “Design methodology for the performance, weight, and economic assessment of chemical rocket engines.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 30 (1): 04016071. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000668.
Friedman, J. H., and W. Stuetzle. 1981. “Projection pursuit regression.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 76 (376): 817–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1981.10477729.
Giangaspero, G., D. MacManus, and I. Goulos. 2019. “Surrogate models for the prediction of the aerodynamic performance of exhaust systems.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 92 (Sep): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.05.027.
Giunta, A., and L. Watson. 1998. “A comparison of approximation modeling techniques—Polynomial versus interpolating models.” In Proc., 7th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symp. on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-4758.
Han, Z.-H., and S. Görtz. 2012. “Hierarchical kriging model for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling.” AIAA J. 50 (9): 1885–1896. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J051354.
Hassanalian, M., and A. Abdelkefi. 2017. “Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 91 (May): 99–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003.
He, Y., J. Sun, P. Song, X. Wang, and A. S. Usmani. 2020. “Preference-driven Kriging-based multiobjective optimization method with a novel multipoint infill criterion and application to airfoil shape design.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 96 (Jan): 105555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105555.
Heidebrecht, A., and D. G. MacManus. 2019. “Surrogate model of complex non-linear data for preliminary nacelle design.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 84 (Jan): 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.08.020.
Jin, R., W. Chen, and T. W. Simpson. 2001. “Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 23 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4.
Kontogiannis, S. G., and J. A. Ekaterinaris. 2013. “Design, performance evaluation and optimization of a UAV.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 29 (1): 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2013.04.005.
Laslett, G. M. 1994. “Kriging and splines: An empirical comparison of their predictive performance in some applications.” J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89 (426): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1994.10476759.
Lu, H., Q. Li, and T. Pan. 2018. “Optimization strategy for an axial-flow compressor using a region-segmentation combining surrogate model.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 31 (5): 04018076. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000907.
Marchlewski, K., Ł. Łaniewski-Wołłk, and S. Kubacki. 2020. “Aerodynamic shape optimization of a gas turbine engine air-delivery duct.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 33 (4): 04020042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001157.
Queipo, N. V., R. T. Haftka, W. Shyy, T. Goel, R. Vaidyanathan, and P. K. Tucker. 2005. “Surrogate-based analysis and optimization.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 41 (1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001.
Raymer, D. P. 1999. Aircraft design: A conceptual approach, 21. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Simpson, T. W., T. M. Mauery, J. J. Korte, and F. Mistree. 2001. “Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization.” AIAA J. 39 (12): 2233–2241. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1234.
Vaidyanathan, R., P. K. Tucker, N. Papila, and W. Shyy. 2004. “Computational-fluid-dynamics-based design optimization for single-element rocket injector.” J. Propul. Power 20 (4): 705–717. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.11464.
Viana, F. A., T. W. Simpson, V. Balabanov, and V. Toropov. 2014. “Special section on multidisciplinary design optimization: Metamodeling in multidisciplinary design optimization: How far have we really come?” AIAA J. 52 (4): 670–690. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052375.
Vu, N. A., D. K. Dang, and T. Le Dinh. 2019. “Electric propulsion system sizing methodology for an agriculture multicopter.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 90 (Jul): 314–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.04.044.
Yakowitz, S., and F. Szidarovszky. 1985. “A comparison of kriging with nonparametric regression methods.” J. Multivar. Anal. 16 (1): 21–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-259X(85)90050-8.
Yan, C., Z. Yin, X. Shen, D. Mi, F. Guo, and D. Long. 2020. “Surrogate-based optimization with improved support vector regression for non-circular vent hole on aero-engine turbine disk.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 96 (Jan): 105332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105332.
Zhu, H., H. Nie, L. Zhang, X. Wei, and M. Zhang. 2020. “Design and assessment of octocopter drones with improved aerodynamic efficiency and performance.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 106 (Nov): 106206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.106206.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 34Issue 4July 2021

History

Received: Sep 8, 2020
Accepted: Jan 22, 2021
Published online: Apr 21, 2021
Published in print: Jul 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Sep 21, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight Vehicle, Nanjing Univ. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China; Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore 639798. Email: [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight Vehicle, Nanjing Univ. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Limao Zhang [email protected]
Assistant Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore 639798; Nanyang Environment and Water Research Institute, Nanyang Technological Univ., Singapore 639798. Email: [email protected]
Siqiang Deng [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing Univ. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China. Email: [email protected]
Xiaohui Wei [email protected]
Professor, State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Key Laboratory of Fundamental Science for National Defense-Advanced Design Technology of Flight Vehicle, Nanjing Univ. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

  • Design and experimental testing of safe flight control system for novel vertical take-off and landing aircraft, Journal of Vibroengineering, 10.21595/jve.2021.22190, 24, 3, (481-500), (2022).

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share