Technical Papers
Sep 18, 2020

Uncertainty Analysis of the Dynamic Responses of a Transmission Tower-Line System Subjected to Cable Rupture

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 34, Issue 1

Abstract

Because transmission tower-line systems are always exposed to the natural environment, such structures are vulnerable to various meteorological conditions, and the rupture of a transmission line is a particularly serious potential accident. Although many studies have been conducted on the dynamic responses of transmission towers subjected to cable rupture, few have considered the uncertainties that exist in the structures of transmission towers. To investigate the effects of the uncertainties in material properties and geometric parameters on the dynamic responses caused by cable rupture, a finite-element (FE) model is established in Abaqus; then deterministic, sensitivity, and probability analyses are conducted in succession. This study reveals that the yield strength and geometric size of diagonal members have significant effects on the responses of a transmission tower subjected to conductor rupture. In addition, based on the probability analysis, the results of the deterministic analysis are reliable, and structures under a conductor rupture load have a substantial probability of being partially damaged, which means that current design codes must be improved.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data, models, or code generated or used during the study are available from the corresponding author by request. The specific items are listed as follows:
1.
Data, including the displacement history at each measuring point, time history of the rotation angle at each measuring point, and the result of sampling;
2.
FE model of a tower-line system; and
3.
Codes, including the technical code for the design of tower and pole structures of overhead transmission lines, the standard for the design of high-rise structures, and a unified standard for the reliability design of building structures.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Awards Nos. 51778347 and 51578325) and the Young Scholars Program of Shandong University (Award No. 2017WLJH33).

References

Alembagheri, M., and M. Seyedkazemi. 2015. “Seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of gravity dams.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 44 (1): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2457.
Alminhana, F., F. Albermani, and M. Mason. 2015. “Comparison of responses of guyed and freestanding transmission line towers under conductor breakage loading.” Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 15 (8): 1540023. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455415400234.
Ballaben, J. S., R. Sampaio, and M. B. Rosales. 2017. “Uncertainty quantification in the dynamics of a guyed mast subjected to wind load.” Eng. Struct. 132 (Feb): 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.025.
Cao, D. J., L. Tian, and R. S. Ma. 2014. “Analysis of impact effect of power transmission tower-line system subjected to broken wire of transmission line.” [In Chinese.] J. Disaster Prev. Mitigation Eng. 34 (3): 365–369. https://doi.org/10.13409/j.cnki.jdpme.2014.03.019.
Carlos, T. B., and J. Kaminski. 2017. “Dynamic response due to cable rupture in a transmission lines guyed towers.” Procedia Eng. 199: 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.173.
Chen, G. X., and J. H. Li. 1985. “Statistical parameters of material strength and geometric properties of shapes for steel members.” [In Chinese.] J. Chongqing Constr. Eng. Coll. 1 (1): 1–23.
China Architecture and Building Press. 2018. Unified standard for reliability design of building structures. GB 50068-2018. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press.
China Planning Press. 2012. Technical code for the design of tower and pole structures of overhead transmission line. DL/T 5154-2012. Beijing: China Planning Press.
China Planning Press. 2019. Standard for design of high-rising structures. GB 50135-2019. Beijing: China Planning Press.
Dolsek, M. 2009. “Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modeling uncertainties.” Earthquake Eng. Struct D. 38 (6): 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.869.
Fu, X., and H. N. Li. 2018. “Uncertainty analysis of the strength capacity and failure path for a transmission tower under a wind load.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 173 (Feb): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2017.12.009.
Fu, X., H. N. Li, G. Li, and Z. Q. Dong. 2020. “Fragility analysis of a transmission tower under combined wind rain loads.” J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 199 (Apr): 104098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2020.104098.
Heidary-Torkamani, H., K. Bargi, and R. Amirabadi. 2014. “Seismic vulnerability assessment of pile-supported wharves using fragility curves.” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10 (11): 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.823453.
Ji, J. U. N., A. S. Elnashai, and D. A. Kuchma. 2009. “Seismic fragility relationships of reinforced concrete high-rise buildings.” Struct. Des. Tall Special Build. 18 (3): 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.408.
Li, Y., H. J. Liu, Z. L. Li, and X. Z. Ge. 2017. “Nonlinear dynamic analysis for a transmission tower-line system subjected to wire breakage.” [In Chinese.] J. Vib. Shock 36 (7): 70–79. https://doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.07.011.
Liu, C. C., X. K. Mao, F. D. Liu, and X. H. Li. 2012. “Model test for icing line disconnection on a long-span transmission tower-line system.” [In Chinese.] J. Vib. Shock 31 (24): 41–47. https://doi.org/10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2012.24.033.
Mcclure, G., and M. Lapointe. 2003. “Modeling the structural dynamic response of overhead transmission lines.” Comput. Struct. 81 (8–11): 825–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00472-8.
Mo, Z. L., Z. F. Zhang, and G. Y. Hu. 2010. “Experimental research for broken conductor wire of ±800 kV DC EHV suspension tower model.” [In Chinese.] Electr. Power Constr. 31 (1): 30–33.
Mozer, J. D., W. A. Wood, and J. A. Hribar. 1981. “Broken wire tests on a model transmission line system.” IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 100(3): 938–947. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1981.316628.
Shen, G. H., C. S. Cai, B. N. Sun, and W. J. Lou. 2011. “Study of dynamic impacts on transmission-line systems attributable to conductor breakage using the finite-element method.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 25 (2): 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000133.
Song, X. X., B. Chen, D. Yang, and W. P. Xie. 2016. “Research on wire-breaking effects of transmission angle tower-line systems.” [In Chinese.] J. Wuhan Univ. Tech. 38 (3): 66–70.
Tian, L., R. S. Ma, and B. Qu. 2018. “Influence of different criteria for selecting ground motions compatible with IEEE 693 required response spectrum on seismic performance assessment of electricity transmission towers.” Eng. Struct. 156 (Feb): 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.046.
Vincent, P., C. Huet, M. Charbonneau. P. Guillbault, M. Lapointe, and D. Banville. 2004. “Testing and numerical simulation of overhead transmission lines dynamics under component failure conditions.” In Proc., 40th General Session of CIGRÉ. Paris: CIGRÉ.
Xie, L., J. Tang, H. Tang, Q. Xie, and S. Xue. 2012. “Seismic fragility assessment of transmission towers via performance-based analysis.” In Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal: WCEE.
Yang, F. L., J. B. Yang, Z. F. Zhang, H. J. Zhang, and H. J. Xing. 2014. “Analysis on the dynamic responses of a prototype line from iced broken conductors.” Eng. Fail. Anal. 39 (Apr): 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.01.015.
Zhang, D. 2003. Power engineering high voltage transmission line design manual. [In Chinese.] Beijing: China Electric Power Press.
Zhong, J., X. Zhi, and F. Fan. 2018. “Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty of single-layer reticulated domes.” Int. J. Steel Struct. 18 (5): 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0057-3.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 34Issue 1January 2021

History

Received: Feb 29, 2020
Accepted: Jun 12, 2020
Published online: Sep 18, 2020
Published in print: Jan 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Feb 18, 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Li Tian, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, Shandong Province 250061, China (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Kaiming Liu
M.Eng. Student, School of Civil Engineering, Shandong Univ., Jinan, Shandong Province 250061, China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share