Technical Papers
May 31, 2020

Theoretical and Numerical Analyses of Aerodynamic Characteristics on Shock Vector Control

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 33, Issue 5

Abstract

A transverse injection into high-speed freestreams is a significant principle applied to realistic engineering applications, such as drag reduction, fuel service in a scramjet combustor, and fluidic thrust vectoring control. Fluidic thrust vector control is quite popular for micro space launcher propulsion systems due to several advantages, including better control effectiveness, few or no moving mechanical equipment, and fast dynamic responsiveness. Shock vector control is a straightforward and direct method in which the secondary flow is injected from the transverse section into the divergent portion of the supersonic nozzle. This work conducted coupled theoretical and numerical analyses to investigate performance variations in a three-dimensional supersonic rectangular nozzle with a slot injector. To verify the reliability and accuracy of the research methodology, numerical results were validated against existing experimental data from the literature. Computational static pressure distributions based on the shear stress transport k-ω turbulence model matched well with experimentally measured pressure values. Five control parameters were investigated in detail, involving the nozzle pressure ratio, injection pressure ratio, injector location, slot length, and slot width. Critical performance variations were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Some useful conclusions are offered for fighter jet designers.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the published article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B3016436).

References

Anderson, J. D. 2004. Modern compressible flow: Quasi-one-dimensional flow. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Azevedo, D. 1993. “Measured thrust losses associated with secondary air injection through nozzle walls.” J. Propul. Power 9 (1): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11483.
Das, S. S., J. C. Páscoa, M. Trancossi, and A. Dumas. 2016. “Computational fluid dynamic study on a novel propulsive system: ACHEON and its integration with an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).” J. Aerosp. Eng. 29 (1): 04015015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000498.
Deere, K. A. 2003. “Summary of fluidic thrust vectoring research conducted at NASA Langley Research Center.” In Proc., 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf., 1–18. Orlando, FL: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Deere, K. A., B. L. Berrier, J. D. Flamm, and S. K. Johnson. 2003. “Computational study of fluidic thrust vectoring using separation control in a nozzle.” In Proc., 21st AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf., 1–11. Orlando, FL: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Deng, R. Y., and H. D. Kim. 2015. “A study on the thrust vector control using a bypass flow passage.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 229 (9): 1722–1729.
Deng, R. Y., F. S. Kong, and H. D. Kim. 2014. “Numerical simulation of fluidic thrust vectoring in an axisymmetric supersonic nozzle.” J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 28 (12): 4979–4987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-014-1119-x.
Erdem, E., and K. Kontis. 2010. “Numerical and experimental investigation of transverse injection flows.” Shock Waves 20 (2): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-010-0247-1.
Ferlauto, M., and R. Marsilio. 2016. “Numerical simulation of fluidic thrust-vectoring.” J. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. Syst. 95 (3): 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404724.
Fleeman, E. L. 2006. Tactical missile design. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Francis, M. S. 2018. “Air vehicle management with integrated thrust-vector control.” AIAA J. 56 (12): 4741–4751. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056768.
Frey, M., K. Makowka, and T. Aichner. 2016. “The TICTOP nozzle—A new nozzle contouring concept.” CEAS Space J. 9 (2): 175–181.
Grunnet, J. L. 1971. “Factors affecting the magnitude of jet interaction forces.” J. Spacecraft Rockets 8 (12): 1234–1235. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.30370.
Gu, R., J. Xu, and S. Guo. 2014. “Experimental and numerical investigations of a bypass dual throat nozzle.” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 136 (8): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4026943.
Heo, J. Y., and H. G. Sung. 2012. “Fluidic thrust-vector control of supersonic jet using coflow injection.” J. Propul. Power 28 (4): 858–861. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34266.
Huang, W. 2016. “Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 50 (Mar): 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.01.001.
Karamcheti, K., and H. T.-S. Hsia. 1963. “Integral approach to an approximate analysis of thrust vector control by secondary injection.” AIAA J. 1 (11): 2538–2544. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2106.
Ko, H., and W. S. Yoon. 2002. “Performance analysis of secondary gas injection into a conical rocket nozzle.” J. Propul. Power 18 (3): 585–591. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5972.
Lin, Z., Z. X. Liu, Q. Liu, and Y. Li. 2020b. “Fluidization characteristics of particles in a groove induced by horizontal air flow.” Powder Technol. 363: 442–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.01.022.
Lin, Z., X. W. Sun, T. C. Yu, Y. F. Zhang, Y. Li, and Z. C. Zhu. 2020a. “Gas-solid two-phase flow and erosion calculation of gate valve based on the CFD-DEM model.” Powder Technol. 366: 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.050.
Mahesh, K. 2013. “The interaction of jets with crossflow.” Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 45 (1): 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-120710-101115.
Malik, T. I., and R. K. Tagirov. 1987. “Calculation of the length of the shock boundary layer interaction zone.” Fluid Dyn. 22 (2): 318–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052272.
Mangin, B. 2006. “Fluidic thrust-vectoring of a planar supersonic nozzle.” Thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
Mangin, B., A. Chpoun, and L. Jacquin. 2006. “Experimental and numerical study of the fluidic thrust vectoring of a two-dimensional supersonic nozzle.” In Proc., 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf., 1–14. San Francisco: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Sellam, M., A. Chpoun, M. Zmijanovic, and V. Lago. 2012. “Fluidic thrust vectoring of an axisymmetrical nozzle: An analytical model.” Int. J. Aerodyn. 2 (2/3/4): 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAD.2012.049112.
Sellam, M., Z. Vladeta, L. Leger, and A. Chpoun. 2015. “Assessment of gas thermodynamic characteristics on fluidic thrust vectoring performance: Analytical, experimental and numerical study.” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 53 (Jun): 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2015.03.005.
Shi, J. W., L. Zhou, Z. X. Wang, and X. L. Sun. 2016. “Investigation on flowfield characteristics and performance of shock vector control nozzle based on confined transverse injection.” J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 138 (10): 101502-1–101502-11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033140.
Spaid, F. W., and E. E. Zukoski. 1968. “A study of the interaction of gaseous jets from transverse slots with supersonic external flows.” AIAA J. 6 (2): 205–212. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4479.
Sutton, G. P., and O. Biblarz. 2001. Rocket propulsion elements. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Vas, I. E., and S. M. Bogdonoff. 1955. Interaction of a turbulent boundary layer with a step at M=3.85. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ.
Viti, V., R. Neel, and J. A. Schetz. 2009. “Detailed flow physics of the supersonic jet interaction flow field.” Phys. Fluids 21 (4): 046101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3112736.
Waithe, K. A., and K. A. Deere. 2003. “Experimental and computational investigation of multiple injection ports in a convergent-divergent nozzle for fluidic thrust vectoring.” In Proc., 24th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conf., 1–14. Orlando, FL: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Wing, D. J. 1994. Static investigation of two fluidic thrust-vectoring concepts on a two-dimensional convergent-divergent nozzle: NASA TM-4574. Hampton, VA: NASA.
Wing, D. J., and V. J. Giuliano. 1997. “Fluidic thrust vectoring of an axisymmetric exhaust nozzle at static conditions.” In Proc., ASME Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, 1–6. Vancouver, Canada: ASME.
Wu, K. X., Y. Z. Jin, and H. D. Kim. 2018. “Fluidic thrust vector control based on counter-flow concept.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part G: J. Aerosp. Eng. 233 (4): 1412–1422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410017752580.
Wu, K. X., Y. Z. Jin, and H. D. Kim. 2019. “Hysteresis behaviors in counter-flow thrust vector control.” J. Aerosp. Eng. 32 (4): 04019041. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001027.
Wu, K. X., S. K. Raman, V. R. P. Sethuraman, G. Zhang, and H. D. Kim. 2020. “Effect of the wall temperature on Mach stem transformation in pseudo-steady shock wave reflections.” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 147 (Feb): 118927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118927.
Zhang, G., Y. F. Zhang, Q. Liu, Y. Li, and Z. Lin. 2020. “Experimental study on the two-phase flow of gas-particles through a model brake valve.” Powder Technol. 367: 172–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.03.047.
Zmijanovic, V., V. Lago, and A. Chpoun. 2014. “Thrust shock vector control of an axisymmetric conical supersonic nozzle via secondary transverse gas injection.” Shock Waves 24 (1): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-013-0479-y.
Zmijanovic, V., L. Leger, and E. Depussay. 2016. “Experimental-numerical parametric investigation of a rocket nozzle secondary injection thrust vectoring.” J. Propul. Power 32 (1): 196–213. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35721.
Zmijanovic, V., L. Leger, V. Lago, M. Sellam, and A. Chpoun. 2012. “Experimental and numerical study of thrust-vectoring effects by transverse gas injection into a propulsive axisymmetric C-D nozzle.” In Proc., 48th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conf., 1–16. Atlanta: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
Zou, X. H., and Q. Wang. 2011. “The comparative analysis of two typical fluidic thrust vectoring exhaust nozzles on aerodynamic characteristics.” Int. J. Aerosp. Mech. Eng. 5 (4): 827–833. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1078052.
Zukoski, E. E. 1967. “Turbulent boundary-layer separation in front of a forward-facing step.” AIAA J. 5 (10): 1746–1753. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4299.
Zukoski, E. E., and F. W. Spaid. 1964. “Secondary injection of gases into a supersonic flow.” AIAA J. 2 (10): 1689–1696. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.2653.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 33Issue 5September 2020

History

Received: Mar 6, 2019
Accepted: Mar 9, 2020
Published online: May 31, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Oct 31, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kexin Wu, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Researcher, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Andong National Univ., Seongcheon-Dong 1375, Gyeongdong-Ro, Andong-Si, Gyeongsangbuk-Do 760-749, Republic of Korea. Email: [email protected]
Research Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Andong National Univ., Seongcheon-Dong 1375, Gyeongdong-Ro, Andong-Si, Gyeongsangbuk-Do 760-749, Republic of Korea. Email: [email protected]
Heuy Dong Kim [email protected]
Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Andong National Univ., Seongcheon-Dong 1375, Gyeongdong-Ro, Andong-Si, Gyeongsangbuk-Do 760-749, Republic of Korea (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share