Technical Papers
May 2, 2017

Reentry Trajectory Optimization for Hypersonic Glide Vehicle with Flexible Initial Conditions

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 30, Issue 5

Abstract

In the reentry trajectory optimization for unpowered hypersonic glide vehicles (HGVs), the initial reentry conditions (IRCs), which are crucial for flight performance, are partly flexible instead of being specified. Aiming at simultaneously determining the optimal IRCs and optimal control policy, a hybrid optimization strategy with an evaluate-during-optimize framework is proposed in this paper. The IRCs are considered as additional independent design variables, and an evaluation process with multiple performance indicators is established to determine the best IRCs. With the analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) method, a synthesized scalar objective function is set up. Adopting this objective function, feedback information from the evaluation process can be fully included in the optimization process, resulting in a unified optimization framework. The Chebyshev pseudospectral method (CPM) is then introduced as a direct method for solving the resulting trajectory optimization problem. Numerical simulation results for a generic HGV show that the proposed technique is efficient and straightforward. Moreover, this strategy has strong universality for solving optimal control problems with flexible initial conditions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61463029 and 61308120) and the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (No. 2013M540783). The authors gratefully acknowledge all of the support.

References

Botez, R. M., Dinu, A. D., and Cotoi, I. (2007). “Method based on Chebyshev polynomials for aerservoelastic interactions on an F/A-18 aircraft.” J. Aircr., 44(1), 330–333.
Bottasso, C. L., Luraghi, F., Maisano, G., and Shaohua, M. (2015). “Global solution of optimization problems in rotorcraft flight mechanics.” J. Aerosp. Eng., 04014042.
Caflisch, R. E. (1998). “Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo methods.” Acta Numer., 7, 1–49.
Cai, W. W., Yang, L. P., and Zhu, Y. W. (2015). “Optimal reorientation of asymmetric underactuated spacecraft using differential flatness and receding horizon control.” Adv. Space Res., 55(1), 343–353.
Darby, C. L., Hager, W. W., and Rao, A. V. (2011). “An HP-adaptive pseudospectral method for solving optimal control problems.” Opt. Control Appl. Methods, 32(4), 476–502.
Deb, K. (2014). “Multi-objective optimization.” Search methodologies, K. B. Edmund and K. Graham, eds., Springer, Berlin, 403–449.
Dinu, A. D., Botez, R., and Cotoi, I. (2006). “Chebyshev polynomials for unsteady aerodynamic calculations in aeroservoelasticity.” J. Aircr., 43(1), 165–171.
Downey, J. J., Carr, R. W., Bull, K. I., and Jorris, T. R. (2012). “Design of experiments using response surface methods to optimize simulated reentry trajectories.” 28th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology, Ground Testing, and Flight Testing Conf., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Fahroo, F., and Ross, I. M. (2002). “Direct trajectory optimization by a Chebyshev pseudospectral method.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 25(1), 160–166.
Garg, D., Hager, W. W., and Rao, A. V. “Pseudospectral methods for solving infinite-horizon optimal control problems.” Automatica, 47(4), 829–837.
Gill, P. E., Murray, W., and Saunders, M. A. (2002). “SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization.” SIAM J. Opt., 12(4), 979–1006.
Gong, Q., and Fahroo, F. (2009). “A Chebyshev pseudospectral method for nonlinear constrained optimal control problems.” 48th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, IEEE, New York, 5057–5062.
Gong, Q., Ross, I. M., and Fahroo, F. (2010). “Costate computation by a Chebyshev pseudospectral method.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 33(2), 623–628.
Guo, X., and Zhu, M. (2013). “Direct trajectory optimization based on a mapped Chebyshev pseudospectral method.” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 26(2), 401–412.
Homem-de-Mello, T., and Bayraksan, G. (2014). “Monte Carlo sampling-based methods for stochastic optimization.” Surv. Oper. Res. Manage. Sci., 19(1), 56–85.
Jaddu, H. (2002). “Direct solution of nonlinear optimal control problems using quasilinearization and Chebyshev polynomials.” J. Franklin Inst., 339(4), 479–498.
Jain, S., and Tsiotras, P. (2008). “Trajectory optimization using multiresolution techniques.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 31(5), 1424–1436.
Jamilnia, R., and Naghash, A. (2013). “Optimal guidance based on receding horizon control and online trajectory optimization.” J. Aerosp. Eng., 786–793.
Jorris, T. R., and Cobb, R. G. (2009). “Three-dimensional trajectory optimization satisfying waypoint and no-fly zone constraints.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 32(2), 551–572.
Josselyn, S., and Ross, I. M. (2003). “Rapid verification method for the trajectory optimization of reentry vehicles.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 26(3), 505–508.
Kindler, J. T., Schoettle, U. M., and Well, K. H. (2000). “Entry interface window of landing site Coober Pedy for the experimental vehicle X-38 V201.” AIAA Atmosph. Flight Mechanics Conf., AIAA, Reston, VA.
Li, S., and Jiang, X. (2014). “Review and prospect of guidance and control for Mars atmospheric entry.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 69(4), 40–57.
Li, Y., Cui, N. G., and Rong, S. (2009). “Trajectory optimization for hypersonic boost-glide missile considering aeroheating.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 81(1), 3–13.
Ma, H., Qin, T., and Zhang, W. (2011). “An efficient Chebyshev algorithm for the solution of optimal control problems.” Autom. Control, IEEE Trans., 56(3), 675–680.
Maroński, R., and Rogowski, K. (2011). “Minimum-time running: a numerical approach.” Acta BioEng. Biomech./Wrocław Univ. Technol., 13(2), 83–86.
MATLAB [Computer software]. MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Moshman, N. D., and Proulx, R. J. (2014). “Range improvements in gliding reentry vehicles from thrust capability.” J. Spacecr. Rockets, 51(5), 1681–1694.
NOAA, NASA, and USAF. (1976). “U.S. standard atmosphere.” ⟨https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/modelweb/atmos/us_standard.html⟩ U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, (Oct. 1. 2014).
Patron, R. F., Botez, R. M., and Labour, D. (2013). “New altitude optimisation algorithm for the flight management system CMA-9000 improvement on the A310 and L-1011 aircraft.” R. Aeronaut. Soc., 117(1194), 787–805.
Poustini, M. J., Esmaelzadeh, R., and Adami, A. (2015). “A new approach to trajectory optimization based on direct transcription and differential flatness.” Acta Astronaut., 107, 1–13.
Rizvi, S. T., Linshu, H., and Dajun, X. (2015). “Optimal trajectory analysis of hypersonic boost-glide waverider with heat load constraint.” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 87(1), 67–78.
Saaty, T. L. (2008). “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.” Int. J. Serv. Sci., 1(1), 83–98.
Saaty, T. L. (2013). “Analytic hierarchy process.” Encyclopedia of operations research and management, I. S. Gass and M. C. Fu, eds., Springer, Berlin, 52–64.
SNOPT v7 [Computer software]. Univ. of California, San Diego.
Steele, K., Carmel, Y., Cross, J., and Wilcox, C. (2009). “Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making.” Risk Anal., 29(1), 26–33.
Tian, B., and Zong, Q. (2011). “Optimal guidance for reentry vehicles based on indirect Legendre pseudospectral method.” Acta Astronaut., 68(7), 1176–1184.
Trefethen, L. N. (2008). “Is Gauss quadrature better than Clenshaw-Curtis?” SIAM Rev., 50(1), 67–87.
Williams, P. (2009). “Hermite-Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto direct transcription in trajectory optimization.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 32(4), 1392–1395.
Xie, Y., Liu, L., Liu, J., Tang, G., and Zheng, W. (2012). “Rapid generation of entry trajectories with waypoint and no-fly zone constraints.” Acta Astronaut., 77, 167–181.
Yan, X., Lyu, S., and Tang, S. (2014). “Analysis of optimal initial glide conditions for hypersonic glide vehicles.” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 27(2), 217–225.
Yokoyama, N., and Suzuki, S. (2005). “Modified genetic algorithm for constrained trajectory optimization.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 28(1), 139–144.
Zavadskas, E. K., Zakarevicius, A., and Antucheviciene, J. (2006). “Evaluation of ranking accuracy in multi-criteria decisions.” Informatica, Lith. Acad. Sci., 17(4), 601–618.
Zhang, J., Li, H. Y., Luo, Y. Z., and Tang, G. J. (2012). “Error analysis for rendezvous phasing orbital control using design of experiments.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 17(1), 74–82.
Zhang, K., and Chen, W. (2011). “Reentry vehicle constrained trajectory optimization.” Proc., AIAA Int. Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conf., AIAA, Reston, VA.
Zhao, J., and Zhou, R. (2013). “Reentry trajectory optimization for hypersonic vehicle satisfying complex constraints.” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 26(6), 1544–1553.
Zhao, Y., and Tsiotras, P. (2011). “Density functions for mesh refinement in numerical optimal control.” J. Guidance, Control, Dyn., 34(1), 271–277.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 30Issue 5September 2017

History

Received: Jan 21, 2015
Accepted: Nov 28, 2016
Published online: May 2, 2017
Published in print: Sep 1, 2017
Discussion open until: Oct 2, 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Chunyun Dong
Ph.D. Candidate, Institute of Control Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong Univ., Xi’an 710049, P.R. China.
Professor, Institute of Control Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong Univ., Xi’an 710049, P.R. China (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7364-3101. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share