Technical Papers
Jul 11, 2016

Efficiency Analysis of Canards-Based Course Correction Fuze for a 155-mm Spin-Stabilized Projectile

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 6

Abstract

There are many course correction fuze concepts for improving the precision of a spin-stabilized projectile. Some of them consist in a despun fuze equipped with canards. Canards provide continuous and, possibly, modulable maneuvering capabilities in crossrange and downrange. This paper analyzes the efficiency of this type of course correction fuze and determines the best configuration for the canards. To do so, four concepts of canards-based course correction fuze are proposed and tested. To properly operate the fuzes, a guidance algorithm, based on point-of-impact prediction, and two autopilots, a poles/zeros cancellation controller and a proportional integrator controller, are developed. The fuzes efficiency is studied with their control authority footprint and achieved performances during Monte-Carlo simulations. All the tests are done with a pseudo-seven-degrees-of-freedom simulator including the developed algorithms. Those tests demonstrate that the four concepts significantly improve the precision of a spin-stabilized projectile and that, with the proposed algorithms, the best precision is obtained when the canards directly handle the projectile longitudinal acceleration.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bybee, T. (2010). “Precision guidance kit.” 45th Annual NDIA Gun and Missile Systems Conf. & Exhibition, National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA), Arlington, VA.
Calise, A. J., and El-Shirbiny, H. A. (2001). “An analysis of aerodynamic control for direct fire spinning projectile.” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf. and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Costello, L. D., and Peterson, A. A. (2000). “Linear theory of a dual-spin projectile.”, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Fairfax, L. D., and Fresconi, F. E. (2012). “Position estimation for projectile using low-cost sensor and flight dynamics.”, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Fresconi, F. (2011). “Guidance and control of a fin-stabilized projectile based on flight dynamics with reduced sensor and actuator requirements.”, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Fresconi, F., Celmins, I., Silton, S., and Costello, M. (2015). “High maneuverability projectile flight using low cost components.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 41, 175–188.
Fresconi, F., Cooper, G., and Costello, M. (2011). “Practical assessment of real-time impact point estimators for smart weapons.” J. Aerosp. Eng., 1–11.
Gagnon, E., and Lauzon, M. (2008). “Course correction fuze concept analysis for in-service 155 mm spin-stabilized gunnery projectile.” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf. and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Gagnon, E., Pomerleau, A., and Desbiens, A. (1998). “Simplified, ideal or inverted decoupling?” ISA Trans., 37(4), 265–276.
Grignon, C., Cayzac, R., and Heddadj, S. (2007). “Improvement of artillery projectile accuracy.” 23rd Int. Symp. on Ballistics, International Ballistics Society, San Antonio, TX.
Hillstrom, T., and Osborne, P. (2005). “United defense course correcting fuze for the projectile guidance kit program.” 49th NDIA Annual Fuze Conf., National Defense Industrial Association, Arlington, VA.
Hollis, M. S. L., and Brandon, F. J. (1999). “Design and analysis of a fuze-configurable range correction device for an artillery projectile.”, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Kautzsch, K. B., and Reusch, O. (2003). “Precision enhancement build on a multi functional fuze for 155 mm artillery munition.” 47th NDIA Annual Fuze Conf., National Defense Industrial Association, Arlington, VA.
Lieske, R. F., and Reiter, M. L. (1966). “Equations of motion for a modified point mass trajectory.”, Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD.
Lloyd, K. H., and Brown, D. P. (1979). “Instability of spinning projectiles during terminal guidance.” J. Guidance Control Dyn., 2(1), 65–70.
McCoy, R. L. (2012). Modern exterior ballistics, Schiffer, Atglen, PA.
Ollerenshaw, D., and Costello, M. (2008). “Simplified projectile swerve solution for general control inputs.” J. Guidance Control Dyn., 31(5), 1259–1265.
Park, W., Ryoo, C.-K., Kim, B. S., Kim, Y., and Kim, J. (2011). “A new practical guidance law for a guided projectile.” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conf., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
PRODAS version 3.5.3 [Computer software]. ArrowTech Associates, South Burlington, VT.
Reagan, F. J., and Smith, J. (1975). “Aeroballistics of a terminally corrected spinning projectile.” J. Spacecraft Rockets, 12(12), 733–738.
Robinson, J. W. C., and Strömbäck, P. (2013). “Perturbation based guidance for a generic 2D course correcting fuze.” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conf., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Rogers, J., and Costello, M. (2010). “Design of a roll-stabilized mortar projectile with reciprocating canards.” J. Guidance Control Dyn., 33(4), 1026–1034.
Rosema, C., Doyle, J., Auman, L., and Underwood, M. (2011). “Missile datcom, user’s manual—2011 revision.”, U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Research, Redstone Arsenal, AL.
Teofilatto, P., and De Pasquale, E. (1998). “A fast guidance algorithm for an autonomous navigation system.” Planet. Space Sci., 46(11-12), 1627–1632.
Theodoulis, S., Gassmann, V., Brunner, T., and Wernert, P. (2013a). “Fixed structure robust control design for the 155 mm canard-guided projectile roll-channel autopilot.” Proc., 21st Mediterranean Conf. on Control Automation, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ.
Theodoulis, S., Gassmann, V., Brunner, T., and Wernert, P. (2013b). “Robust bank-to-turn autopilot design for a class of 155 mm spin-stabilized canard-guided projectiles.” AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Theodoulis, S., Sve, F., and Wernert, P. (2015). “Robust gain-scheduled autopilot design for spin-stabilized projectiles with a course-correction fuze.” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 42, 477–489.
Welch, G., and Bishop, G. (2006). “An introduction to the Kalman filter.”, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Wernert, P., Leopold, F., Bidino, D., Juncker, J., Lehmann, L., Bär, K., and Reindler, A. (2008). “Wind tunnel tests and open-loop trajectory simulations for a 155 mm canards guided spin stabilized projectile.” AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf. and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.
Wernert, P., Theodoulis, S., and Morel, Y. (2010). “Flight dynamics properties of 155 mm spin-stabilized projectiles analyzed in different body frames.” AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conf., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 29Issue 6November 2016

History

Received: Jul 3, 2015
Accepted: Mar 9, 2016
Published online: Jul 11, 2016
Published in print: Nov 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Dec 11, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eric Gagnon [email protected]
Defence Scientist, Weapons Systems, Defence Research and Development Canada, 2459 de la Bravoure Rd., Quebec City, QC, Canada G3J 1X5 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Alexandre Vachon [email protected]
Research Engineer, Numerica Technologies Inc., 3420 rue Lacoste, Quebec City, QC, Canada G2E 4P8. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share