Efficient Multiobjective Optimization of Amphibious Aircraft Fuselage Steps with Decoupled Hydrodynamic and Aerodynamic Analysis Models
Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 29, Issue 3
Abstract
This paper proposes an efficient framework for multiobjective optimization of the fuselage step on a large amphibious aircraft using a combination of computational aerodynamic and hydrodynamic methods. Both cruise drag and water take-off resistance and distance are calculated to evaluate the effects of the two key parameters, the longitudinal location and the depth of the step. A Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) model was used for the calculation of cruise drag of the wing body configuration. Water take-off resistance and distance required for the baseline configuration were calculated using a volume of fluid method for hydrodynamic calculation and RANS method for aerodynamic calculation, respectively. A drag breakdown method was adopted to improve the efficiency of the hydraulic calculations. The method can achieve an accuracy of less than 5% difference compared to fully viscous calculations with only half of the computational time. The optimization is achieved using a combination of design of experiment and the response surfaces method. The optimized step configuration achieved an 18% improvement in take-off distance while maintaining similar cruise performance. The proposed method is generic and can be used in the optimizations of other components such as wings and fuselage geometries of amphibious aircraft.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Allison, J. M., and Ward, K. E. (1936). “Tank tests of models of flying boat hulls having longitudinal steps.”, Washington, DC.
ANSYS/FLUENT [Computer software]. Academic Research, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
ANSYS/ICEM [Computer software]. Academic Research, ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
Bell, J. W. (1935). “The effect of depth of step on the water performance of a flying-boat hull model.”, Washington, DC.
Benson, J. K., and Lina, L. J. (1943). “The use of a retractable planning flap instead of a fixed step on a seaplane.”, Washington, DC.
Canamar, A. C., and Smrcek, I. L. (2009). Seaplane design and configuration, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, Univ. of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K.
Carter, A. W. (1949). “Recent N.A.C.A. research on high length-beam ratio hulls.” J. Aeronaut. Sci., 16(3), 167–183.
Cary, J. W. (2011). Preliminary design optimization of an amphibian aircraft, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, Auburn Univ., AL.
FUSETRA (Future Seaplane Traffic). (2013). “Seventh framework program.” 〈http://www.fusetra.eu/〉 (Feb. 12, 2013).
Howe, D. (2000). Aircraft conceptual design synthesis, Professional Engineering Publishing, Cranfield, U.K.
Husa, B. (2000). “Stepped hull development for amphibious aircraft.” Aerosp. Des. Eng., 1–15.
Kajitani, H. (1983). The summary of the cooperative experiments on Wigley parabolic model in Japan, Tokyo Univ., Tokyo.
Knott, R. C. (1979). The American flying boat: An illustrated history, Naval Press Institute, Annapolis, MD.
Langley, M. (1935). Seaplane float and hull design, Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, London.
Lu, X. (2007). Principles of warships, Beijing Industry of National Defense Press, Beijing.
Millar, C. (2009). Seaplane environmental impact information report, Mews Cobh Co. Cork, Lakeland, Australia.
Nelson, W. (1934). Seaplane design, 1st ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Ni, C., Zhu, R., Miao, G., and Fan, S. (2010). “A method for ship resistance prediction based on CFD computation.” J. Hydrodyn., 25(5), 579–586 (in Chinese).
Park, I. R., Kim, K. S., and Kim, J. A. (2009). “Volume of fluid method for incompressible free surface flows.” Int. J. Numer. Method Fluids, 61(12), 1331–1362.
Parkinson, B., Elson, R. E., Drallet, E. C., and Luoma, A. A. (1943). “Aerodynamic and hydrodynamic tests of a family of models of flying-boat hulls derived from a streamline body.”, Washington, DC.
Qiu, L., and Song, W. (2012). “Efficient decoupled hydrodynamic and aerodynamic analysis of amphibian aircraft water take-off process.” J. Aircr., 50(5), 1369–1379.
Riebe, J. M., and Naeseth, R. L. (1947). “Effect of aerodynamic refinement on the aerodynamic characteristics of a flying-boat hulls.”, N.A.C.A., Washington, DC.
Riebe, J. M., and Naeseth, R. L. (1948). “High-speed wind-tunnel investigation of a flying-boat hull with high length-beam ratio.”, N.A.C.A., Washington, DC.
Shoemaker, J. M., and Bell, J. W. (1936). “Complete tank tests of two flying-boat hulls with pointed steps—N.A.C.A. Models 22-A and 35, N.A.C.A. Model No. 22-A.”, Washington, DC.
Shoemaker, J. M., and Parkinson, J. B. (1933). “A complete tank test of a model of a flying-boat hull-N.A.C.A. Model No. 11.”, N.A.C.A., Washington, DC.
Syed, H. (2009). Amphibian aircraft concept design study, Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, Univ. of Glasgow, Glasgow, U.K.
Tomaszewskl, K. M. (1943). “Hydrodynamic design of seaplane floats.”, Aeronautical Research Council, London.
Wang, S., Wang, C., Chang, X., and Huang, S. (2010). “Ship resistance prediction by CFD methods.” J. Wuhan Univ. Technol., 32(21), 77–80.
Xia, G. (2003). Fluid dynamics of ship, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, Wuhan, China.
Yates, C. C., and Riebe, J. M. (1947). “Effect of length-beam ratio on the aerodynamic characteristics of float hulls.”, N.A.C.A., Washington, DC.
Yu, J., and Liao, G. (2009). Ship resistance calculation and prediction based on CFD method, Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ., Shanghai, China.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 23, 2014
Accepted: Jul 23, 2015
Published online: Oct 21, 2015
Discussion open until: Mar 21, 2016
Published in print: May 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.