Technical Papers
Oct 16, 2014

Novel Assessment Model for the Launch Success Ratio for Lunar Exploration

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 5

Abstract

A successful launch is the first step in a successful lunar exploration (LE) mission. Because spacecraft are very expensive, it is difficult to conduct sufficient flight tests to assess the launch success ratio (LSR) for the LE. Instead, the LSR needs to be comprehensively assessed using simulation tests with several large data samples and flight tests with small data samples. However, the data distribution in these different tests may not come from the same population, and the large-sample simulation test information may dominate the small-sample flight test information. Aimed at these problems, this paper proposes an LSR assessment model for the LE. The model introduces reliability measures to more accurately reflect the differences between the data populations, uses a goodness-of-fit test to check the compatibility of the simulation test data and the flight test data and to calculate the corresponding reliability, and combines the prior simulation test data distribution and the flight test data to estimate the final LSR using Bayesian statistical inference. A theoretical analysis and simulation tests illustrate how the proposed model can overcome the problem of reconciling different data sources with different populations, successfully estimate the LSR for an LE, and solve the problem of large-sample data dominating small-sample data.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by a Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71401136; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No. 2014M552375. The authors are indebted to the editors and reviewers for the valuable comments and suggestions.

References

Ascension, Z. C., and Rivera, D. E. (2011). “A risk-based model predictive control approach to adaptive interventions in behavioral health.” IEEE T. Contr. Syst. T., 19(4), 891–901.
Benjamin, L. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Calabria, R., and Pulcini, G. (1994). “An engineering approach to Bayes estimation for the Weibull distribution.” Microelectron. Reliab., 34(5), 789–802.
Cho, H. C., and Jeremy, K. (2010). “Fault detection and isolation of induction motors using recurrent neural networks and dynamic Bayesian modeling.” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 18(2), 430–437.
Frances, S., and Fernandez-Varea, J. M. (2011). “PENELOPE a code system for Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport.” Workshop Proc., Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris.
Gensior, A., and Thi, M. P. N. (2011). “Flatness-based loss optimization and control of a doubly fed induction generator system.” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 19(6), 1457–1466.
Guarro, S., and Bream, B. (1995). “The Cassini mission risk assessment framework and application techniques.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 49(3), 293–302.
Guikema, S. D., and Pate-Cornell, M. E. (2004). “Bayesian analysis of launch vehicle success rates.” J. Spacecraft Rockets, 41(1), 93–102.
Istvan, M. (2013). “Some infinite sums arising from the Weierstrass product theorem.” Appl. Math. Comput., 219(18), 9838–9846.
Iverson, D. L. (2008). “System health monitoring for space mission operations.” Proc., IEEE Aerospace Conf., IEEE, New York, 1–8.
Jean, V. S. (2013). “A direct proof of the existence of eigenvalues and eigenvectors by Weierstrass’s theorem.” Am. Math. Mon., 120(8), 741–746.
Kaplan, S. (1990). “On the inclusion of precursor and near miss events in qualitative risk assessments: A Bayesian point of view and a space shuttle example.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 27(1), 103–115.
Lee, K. H., and Lee, S. R. (2011). “Comparative study of lunar mission requirements and onboard propulsion system performance.” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 47(6), 480–493.
Lehmann, E. L., and Romano, J. P. (2005). “Probability and mathematical statistics.” Testing statistical hypotheses, Springer, New York, 660–667.
Li, Q. M., Wang, H., and Liu, J. (2007). “Small sample Bayesian analyses in assessment of weapon performance.” J. Syst. Eng. Electron., 18(3), 540–544.
Li, W., and Jia, Y. (2012). “State estimation for jump Markov linear systems by variational Bayesian approximation.” IET Control Theory A., 6(2), 319–326.
Liu, X., and Li, W. Z. (2009). “Manned space flight launch vehicle CZ-2 F reliability growth management.” Proc., Int. Conf. Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, IEEE, New York, 378–381.
Marseguerra, M., and Zio, E. (1998). “Concept paper on dynamic reliability via Monte Carlo simulation.” Math. Comput. Simulat., 47(2–5), 371–382.
Mittal, A., and Kassim, A. (2009). Bayesian network technologies: Applications and graphical models, IGI Publishing, New York.
Naseh, H., and Mirshams, M. (2013). “A Bayesian networks approach to reliability analysis of a space vehicle separation sub-system.” Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST), 2013 6th Int. Conf., IEEE, New York, 807–810.
Pat’e-Cornell, M. E., and Fischbeck, P. S. (1993). “PRA as a management tool: Organizational factors and risk-based priorities for the maintenance of the tiles of the space shuttle orbiter.” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe, 40(3), 239–257.
Ramezani, A., and Moshiri, B. (2011). “Estimation of free flow speed and critical density in a segmented freeway using missing data and Monte Carlo-based expectation maximisation algorithm.” IET Control Theory A., 5(1), 123–130.
Reichard, K., and Crow, E. (2007). “Integrated management of system health in space applications.” Proc., Reliability and Maintainability Symp., IEEE, New York, 107–112.
Richard, V., and John, K. (2010). “Lunar reconnaissance orbiter (LRO): Observations for lunar exploration and science.” Space Sci. Rev., 150(4), 7–22.
Russell, M. J., and Lecakes, D. (2013). “The ‘intelligent’ valve: A diagnostic framework for integrated system-health management of a rocket-engine test stand.” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 60(4), 1489–1497.
Su, Y. L., and Ken, N. (2010). “Monte Carlo simulation method used in reliability evaluation of a laboratory-based micro grid.” Int. MultiConf. of Engineering and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, 1309–1314.
Wang, Y., and Hussein, I. I. (2011). “Bayesian-based decision-making for object search and classification.” IEEE T. Contr. Syst. T., 19(6), 1639–1647.
Yang, S. M., and Qiu, J. (2014). “Hierarchical model-based approach to testability modeling and analysis for PHM of aerospace systems.” J. Aerosp. Eng., 131–139.
Zheng, Y. C., and Ou, Y. (2008). “China’s lunar exploration program: Present and future.” Planet Space Sci., 56(7), 881–886.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 28Issue 5September 2015

History

Received: May 15, 2014
Accepted: Sep 9, 2014
Published online: Oct 16, 2014
Discussion open until: Mar 16, 2015
Published in print: Sep 1, 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shan Yang
Lecturer, Uncertainty Decision-Making Laboratory, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610064, P.R. China; and Dept. of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Jincheng College of Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 611731, P.R. China.
Lei Xu
Lecturer, Uncertainty Decision-Making Laboratory, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610064, P.R. China; and Dept. of Electronics and Business Management, Xihua Univ., Chengdu 610039, P.R. China.
Jiuping Xu, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Uncertainty Decision-Making Laboratory, Sichuan Univ., Chengdu 610064, P.R. China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share