Technical Papers
Jan 11, 2012

Hierarchical Model-Based Approach to Testability Modeling and Analysis for PHM of Aerospace Systems

Publication: Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 1

Abstract

A prognostics and health management (PHM) technique has been developed and applied to a variety of safety-critical aerospace systems. The PHM performance relies highly on test data, which conveys relevant system health information, and design for testability (DFT) developed concurrently with system design is thus of great importance to PHM performance. The testability model is the basis for testability analysis and design. To address the problems that traditional testability models did not include such as any quantitative testability information that could not describe fault-evolution test dependency, a novel model referred to as a quantified uncertainty hierarchical model is presented. In the model, fault-test dependency was described through quantified directed graph and fault attributes; test attributes and propagation attributes were assigned to nodes and directed edges in the form of probability, fuzziness, and uncertainty at the system level. And at component level, the physics of the failure model or extended failure modes, mechanisms, and effects analysis (FMMEA) were used to construct fault-evolution test dependency. The fault/fault-evolution test dependency was represented by a binary dependency matrix, based on the testability analysis for PHM, which can be realized when it is combined with quantitative testability information. Two cases were presented to demonstrate the proposed model for a missile control system and an aeroengine. Application analysis shows the proposed model is feasible and effective, and this approach can be used for testability modeling and PHM analysis of any system.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anthony, M., Bethel, R., and Leong, R. (1987). “ADS-the IDSS adaptive diagnostic system.” Proc., AUTOTESTCON, IEEE, New York, 61–64.
Biswas, G., and Mahadevan, S. (2007). “A hierarchical model-based approach to systems health management.” Aerospace Conf., 2007, IEEE, New York, 1–14.
Bowles, J. B. (2003). “Fundamentals of failure modes and effects analysis.” Tutorial Notes Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symp.
Chen, X. X., Qiu, J., and Liu, G. J. (2009). “Optimal test selection based on hybrid BPSO and GA.” Chin. J. Sci. Instrum., 30(8), 1674–1680.
Cheng, S., Azarian, M., and Pecht, M. (2010a). “Sensor systems for prognostics and health management.” J. Sens., 10(6), 5774–5797.
Cheng, S., Tom, K., Thomas, L., and Pecht, M. (2010b). “A wireless sensor system for prognostics.” IEEE Sens. J., 10(4), 856–862.
Clemens, P. L. (2002). Fault tree analysis, 4th Ed., Jacobs SVERDRUP, Pasadena, CA.
Deb, S., et al. (1995). “Multi-signal flow graphs: A novel approach for system testability analysis and fault diagnosis.” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 10(5), 14–25.
Gong, Y., et al. (2006). “Real-time fault diagnosis for flight control system based on multi-signal flow graph.” Electronics Optics and Control, 13(6), 89–92.
Haynes, L., et al. (1996). “Automatic generation of dependency models using autonomous intelligent agents.” Proc., AUTOTESTCON, IEEE, New York, 303–308.
Hess, A., Stechi, J. S., and Rudv-Clark, S. D. (2008). “The maintenance aware design environment: Development of an aerospace PHM software tool.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Prognostics and Health Management, IEEE, New York, 1–9.
Jiang, J. R., Huang, K. L., Lv, X. M., and Lian, G. Y. (2010). “Technology of testability modeling based on hybrid diagnostic model.” J. Comput. Measure. Control, 18(12), 2690–2693.
Johnson, J. R. (2008). “Fault propagation timing analysis to aid in the selection of sensors for health management systems.” M.S. thesis, Univ. of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO.
Jones, R., Molent, L., and Pitt, S. (2008). “Similitude and the Paris crack growth law.” Int. J. Fatigue, 30(10–11), 1873–1880.
Kalgren, P. W., Byington, C. S., Roemer, M. J., and Watson, M. J. (2006). “Defining PHM-a lexical evolution of maintenance and logistics.” AUTOTESTCON, 2006, IEEE, New York, 353–358.
Kumar, S., Dolev, E., and Pecht, M. (2010). “Parameter selection for health monitoring of electronic products.” Microelectron. Reliab., 50(2), 161–168.
Kurtoglu, T., et al. (2008). “Integrating system health management into the early design of aerospace systems using functional fault analysis.” Int. Conf. on Prognostics and Health Management, IEEE, New York, 1–9.
Li, T. M. (2010). “Research on optimization design and integrated evaluation of testability verification test for equipments.” Ph.D. thesis, National Univ. of Defense Technology, Changsha, China.
Li, T. M., Qiu, J., and Liu, G. J. (2008). “A method of failure sample selection based on failure pervasion intensity.” Acta Armamentarii, 28(7), 829–833.
Niu, G., Singh, S., Holland, S. W., and Pecht, M. (2011). “Health monitoring of electronic products based on Mahalanobis distance and Weibull decision metrics.” Microelectron. Reliab., 51(2), 279–284.
Orsagh, R. F., Brown, D. W., Kalgren, P. W., and Byington, C. S. (2006). “Prognostic health management for avionic systems.” Aerospace Conf., 2006, IEEE, New York, 1–7.
Pugno, N., Ciavarella, M., Cornetti, P., and Carpinteri, A. (2006). “A generalized Paris’s law for fatigue crack growth.” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 54(7), 1333–1349.
Santi, L. M., Sowers, T. S., and Aguilar, R. B. (2005). “Optimal sensor selection for health monitoring systems.” NASA/TM-2005-213955, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Washington, DC.
Simpson, W. R., and Sheppard, J. W. (1994). System test and diagnosis, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
Tian, H. M., Sun, H., and Zhao, H. J. (2009). “Study on TEAMS testability of complex electronic systems.” J. Measure. Control Technol., 28(9), 72–76.
Tian, Z., and Shi, J. Y. (2003). System testability design, analysis and verification, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, Beijing.
Uddin, A. A., Cheng, Z. X., and Saito, S. (2004). “Information flow model and estimations for services on the Internet.” 18th Int. Conf., on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA) 2004, IEEE, New York, 499–505.
Wang, J. H., Xu, H. L., and Cao, X. Y. (2003). “Determination of the optimal testing points for missile attitude control system.” J. Aerospace Shanghai, 1(14), 50–52.
Yang, P. (2008). “Optimization technology of design for diagnostic strategy based on dependency model.” Ph.D. thesis, National Univ. of Defense Technology, Changsha, China.
Zhang, G. F. (2005). “Optimum sensor localization/selection in a diagnostic/prognostic architecture.” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume 27Issue 1January 2014
Pages: 131 - 139

History

Received: Jun 27, 2011
Accepted: Jan 9, 2012
Published online: Jan 11, 2012
Published in print: Jan 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shu-Ming Yang, M.ASCE [email protected]
Lecturer, College of Basic Education, National Univ. of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, P.R. China. E-mail: [email protected]
Professor, College of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation, National Univ. of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, P.R. China. E-mail: [email protected]
Guan-Jun Liu [email protected]
Professor, Science and Technology on Integrated Logistics Support Laboratory, National Univ. of Defense Technology, Changsha, Hunan 410073, P.R. China. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share