Abstract

Consisting of linear elements, reciprocal frame structures are three-dimensional (3D) self-supported structures that can be rapidly assembled. This feature renders them suitable for both temporary and permanent uses. Considered as a type of deployable frame, such structures can be used in architectural and engineering applications. As a subset of reciprocal frame structures, rotegrity structures can be advantageous, owing to their structural form. In this work, a spherical rotegrity structure is constructed on a geodesic sphere through its transformation to a reciprocal structure with mutually supporting elements. Instead of the bolted connections commonly used in practice, a notched connection is proposed to facilitate the construction process of the self-supporting rotegrity structure. The parametric modeling of the rotegrity structure is created in Grasshopper, and two prototypes, having circular and rectangular cross sections, are built. In each prototype, two sets of elements, called Type A and Type B, are used, the linear member lengths and cross sections of which are identical. The cross sections of the members of the two prototypes are different. To assemble the prototypes, first, a number of elements are fabricated through 3D printing and tested in terms of their self-supporting capabilities and connections. Then, stainless steel pipes and wooden bars are used for Prototypes I and II, respectively. It is found that Prototype I, composed of circular hollow section profiles, is unstable, owing to the rotation of elements and because it requires the use of stabilizers. Conversely, Prototype II, which consists of rectangular cross-section elements, becomes stable when the last element is installed in the right place and did not require any additional attachment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Anastas, Y., L. Rhode-Barbarigos, and S. Adriaenssens. 2016. “Design-to-construction workflow for cell-based pattern reciprocal free-form structures.” J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct. 57 (2): 159–176. https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2016.188.737.
Ansems, R. B. M., and L. T. Scott. 2000. “Circumtrindene: A geodesic dome of molecular dimensions. Rational synthesis of 60 of C601.” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122 (12): 2719–2724. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja993028n.
Barrallo, J., F. González-Quintial, and A. Sánchez-Parandiet. 2017. “Laminar constructions and reciprocal structures.” Nexus Network J. 19 (3): 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-017-0346-8.
Baverel, O. 2000. “Nexorades: a family of interwoven space structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Space Structures Research Centre, Department of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Surrey.
Baverel, O., and H. Nooshin. 2007. “Nexorades based on regular polyhedra.” In Nexus network journal, edited by K. Williams, 281–297. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
Bertin, V. 2002. “Hebelstabwerke.” Arch+ 159–160: 150–153.
Brancart, S., O. P. Larsen, L. De Laet, and N. De Temmerman. 2017. “Bending-active reciprocal structures based on equilateral polyhedral geometries.” In Vol. 2017 of Proc., IASS Annual Symp., 1–10. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS). https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iass/piass/2017/00002017/00000009/art00008.
Brancart, S., O. P. Larsen, L. De Laet, and N. De Temmerman. 2019. “Rapidly assembled reciprocal systems with bending-active components: The ReciPlyDome project.” J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct. 60 (1): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2019.199.040.
De Temmerman, N., K. Roovers, L. A. Mira, A. Vergauwen, A. Koumar, S. Brancart, L. De Laet, and M. Mollaert. 2014. “Lightweight transformable structures: Materializing the synergy between architectural and structural engineering.” In Vol. 136 of Proc., 4th Mobile and Rapidly Assembled Structures IV, edited by C. Brebbia and N. De Temmerman, 1–20. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
Douthe, C., and O. Baverel. 2009. “Design of nexorades or reciprocal frame systems with the dynamic relaxation method.” Comput. Struct. 87 (21–22): 1296–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.06.011.
Fenci, G. E., and N. G. Currie. 2017. “Deployable structures classification: A review.” Int. J. Space Struct. 32 (2): 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0266351117711290.
Fuller, R. B. 1958. Buckminster Fuller. R. Buckminster Fuller.
Fuller, R. B. 1982. Geodesic dome. Art, Architecture and Engineering Library.
Gustafsson, J. 2016. “Connections in timber reciprocal frames.” Master's thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Chalmers Univ. of Technology.
Gherardini, F., and F. Leali. 2017. “Reciprocal frames in temporary structures: An aesthetical and parametric investigation.” Nexus Network J. 19 (3): 741–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-017-0352-x.
Hanaor, A., and R. Levy. 2001. “Evaluation of deployable structures for space enclosures.” Int. J. Space Struct. 16 (4): 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1260%2F026635101760832172.
Hart, G. W. 1995. “Nail banger’s Nightmare.” Accessed July 20, 2021. https://makezine.com/2010/05/18/math-monday-nailbangers-nightmare/.
Hughes, R., T. Osterlund, and N. M. Larsen. 2021. “Integrated design-for-manufacturing and AR-aided-assembly workflows for lightweight reciprocal frame timber structures.” Constr. Rob. 5 (2): 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-020-00048-3.
Larsen, O. P. 1996. “Reciprocal frame structures.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Univ. of Nottingham.
Larsen, O. P. 2008. Reciprocal frame architecture. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Larsen, O. P. 2009. “Reciprocal frame architecture in Japan.” In IASS Symposium 2009: Evolution and trends in design, analysis and construction of shell and spatial structures, edited by A. Domingo and C. Lázaro, 1866–1876. Valencia, Spain: Editorial de la UPV.
Larsen, O. P., and D. S. H. Lee. 2013. “Reciprocal frames (RFs) used for quick-built deployable emergency shelters.” In Vol. 2013 of Proc., IASS Annual Symp., 1–7. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS). https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iass/piass/2013/00002013/00000009/art00005.
Motro, R. 1984. “Review of the development of geodesic domes.” In Analysis, design and construction of braced domes, edited by Z. S. Makowski, 387–412. London: Granada Publishing.
Pérez-Valcárcel, J., I. López-César, M. Muñoz-Vidal, F. Suárez-Riestra, and M. Freire-Tellado. 2021. “A new type of reciprocal structures: Deployable yurts for emergency situations.” Adv. Archit. Civ. Eng. 2: 1–15.
Pizzigoni, A. 2010. “A high fiber reinforced concrete prototype for reciprocal structures of demountable building.” In Proc., 50th Symp. of the Int. Association for Shell and Spatial Structures: Evolution and Trends in Design, Analysis and Construction of Shell and Spatial Structures. València, Spain: Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/7162.
Popke, E., and C. J. Kitrick. 2021. Divided spheres: Geodesics and the orderly subdivision of the sphere, 293–336. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: AK Peters/CRC Press.
Pottmann, H., Asperl, A., Hoffer, M. and Kilian, A., 2007. Architectural geometry. Exton, PA: Bentley Institute Press.
Pugh, A. 1976. Polyhedra: a visual approach. Berkeley, CA: Univ of California Press.
Pugnale, A., and M. Sassone. 2014. “Structural reciprocity: Critical overview and promising research/design issues.” Nexus Network J. 16 (1): 9–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-014-0174-z.
Qi, L., Z. Li, H. Pan, L. Li, and X. Huang. 2021. “Study on adjustable connector of reciprocal frame.” Stavební Obzor-Civ. Eng. J. 30 (2): 378–392. https://doi.org/10.14311/CEJ.2021.02.0028.
Ramos-Jaime, C., and J. Sánchez-Sánchez. 2020. “Hyperboloid modules for deployable structures.” Nexus Network J. 22 (2): 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-019-00459-y.
Reimann, D. 2017. “Transforming squares to strips in expanded polyhedral forms.” In Proc., Bridges 2017 Conf., 435–438. London: Tessellations Publishing.
Richter, D. L. 1984. “Developments in Temcor aluminium domes.” In Analysis, design, and construction of braced domes, edited by Z. S. Makowski, 521–539. London: Granada.
Rizzuto, J. P. 2007. “Rotated mutually supported elements in truncated icosahedric domes.” J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatial Struct. 48 (1): 3–17. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iass/jiass/2000/00000041/00000002/art00008.
Rizzuto, J. P. 2017. “Structural modelling investigation of reciprocally supported element lattice honeycomb domes.” Int. J. Comput. Methods Exp. Meas. 5 (4): 432–441. https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V5-N4-432-441.
Rizzuto, J. P. 2018. “Experimental investigation of reciprocally supported element (RSE) lattice honeycomb domes structural behaviour.” Eng. Struct. 166: 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct. 2018.03.094.
Rizzuto, J. P., and O. P. Larsen. 2010. “Connection systems in reciprocal frames and mutually supported elements space structure networks.” Int. J. Space Struct. 25 (4): 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1260%2F0266-3511.25.4.243.
Rotegrity. 1992. Leaflet parity products, simple science toys. Eugene, OR: Rotegrity.
Sánchez, J., F. Escrig, and Mª. T. Rodríguez. 2010. “Reciprocal frames designed by Leonardo. An analytical approach.” Inf. Constr. 62 (518): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3989/ic.09.032.
Serlio, S. 2001. Sebastiano Serlio on architecture: With castrametation of the romans: and the extraordinary book of doors. Books VI and VII of Tutte L’opere D’architettura Et Prospetiva. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Stasi, G. 2020. “Physical sculptures as mental space for reflection: Reflection-in-action.” J. Math. Arts 14 (1–2): 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513472.2020.1734765.
Thönnissen, U. 2014. “A form-finding instrument for reciprocal structures.” Nexus Network J. 16 (1): 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-014-0172-1.
Torghabehi, O. 2018. “Reciprocal Shades: A computational workflow for knowledge-based design and fabrication of multi-performance reciprocal systems.” In Vol. 2018 of Proc., IASS Annual Symp., 1–8. Madrid, Spain: International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS). https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/iass/piass/2018/00002018/00000011/art00008.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 28Issue 3September 2022

History

Received: Sep 11, 2021
Accepted: Apr 25, 2022
Published online: Jun 22, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 22, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Architecture and Urbanism Dept., Tabriz Islamic Art Univ., Tabriz, Iran. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5408-8613
Associate Professor of Smart Structures and Architectural Technology, Architecture and Urbanism Dept., Tabriz Islamic Art Univ., Azadi Blvd, Tabriz, Iran (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9454-1729. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor of Architecture, Dept. of Architecture, Yasar Univ., Izmir, Turkey. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2936-3879

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share