Strategies to Benchmark Sustainability Performance within a Project-Based Organization in the Building Industry: A Case Study in Denmark
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 3
Abstract
The demands for sustainable designs in the building industry have increased dramatically and the industry needs to adapt to these demands. As sustainability has become a natural part of building projects, the need for methodologies and quantifiable measures has increased. This paper investigates possible strategies for benchmarking sustainability performance in project-based organizations (PBOs). A literature search combined with action-based research outlines five strategies that could be employed as general-level assessment methodologies. Each strategy is tested within an archetypical PBO in the Danish building industry. Six criteria are identified for performing a structured evaluation of each strategy, thereby enabling recommendations for further development. The results demonstrate that questionnaires and simple statistics on the number of sustainability certifications performed possess the most value compared to effort; however, SDG surveys also exhibit potential. The paper concludes that existing methods for assessing impact at an organizational level are in their infancy and must be matured dramatically to match future requirements for the documentation of organizational impact. This paper contributes to the development of efficient future assessment methodologies within PBOs.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Innovation Fund Denmark under Grant Number 8053-00091B.
References
Aarseth, W., T. Ahola, K. Aaltonen, A. Økland, and B. Andersen. 2017. “Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review.” Int. J. Project Manage. 35 (6): 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006.
Anand, G., and R. Kodali. 2008. “Benchmarking the benchmarking models.” Benchmarking Int. J. 15 (3): 257–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770810876593.
Andrade, J., and L. Bragança. 2016. “Sustainability assessment of dwellings—A comparison of methodologies.” Civ. Eng. Environ. Syst. 33 (2): 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2016.1145676.
Andrade, J. B., and L. Bragança. 2017. “Extending buildings” life cycle: Sustainability early design support tool.” In Int. HISER Conf. on Advances in Recycling and Management of Construction and Demolition Waste, edited by F. Di Maio, S. Lotfi, M. Bakker, M. Hu, and A. Vahidi, 105–108. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Baumgartner, R. J., and D. Ebner. 2010. “Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels.” Sustainable Dev. 18 (2): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.447.
Berg, J. B., C. Thuesen, S. K. Ernstsen, and P. A. Jensen. 2021. “Reconfiguring the construction value chain: Analysing key sources of friction in the business model archetypes of AEC companies in strategic partnerships.” Construct. Manage. Econ. 39 (6): 533–548.
Bhutta, K. S., and F. Huq. 1999. “Benchmarking—Best practices: An integrated approach.” Benchmarking Int. J. 6 (3): 254–268. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635779910289261.
Boxwell, R. J. J. 1994. Benchmarking for competitive advantage. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
Brejnrod, K. N., P. Kalbar, S. Petersen, and M. Birkved. 2017. “The absolute environmental performance of buildings.” Build. Environ. 119: 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.04.003.
Brundtland, G. H. 1987. “Our common future: Report of the world commission on environment and development.” United Nations Commun. 4 (1): 300.
BSR/GlobeScan. 2012. BSR/globescan state of sustainable business poll. London: Globe Scan.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2010. Sustainability of construction works–sustainability assessment of buildings. I: General framework. CEN/TC 350. EN 15643-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
DK-GBC (Green Building Council Denmark). 2016. Vol. 65 of Bæredygtigt byggeri—markedsundersøgelse. Copenhagen, Denmark: Green Building Council Denmark.
DK-GBC (Green Building Council Denmark). 2020. “Statistics – DGNB certified projects.” Accessed November 20, 2021. www.dk-gbc.dk. http://www.dk-gbc.dk/om-green-building-council-denmark/.
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building theories from case study research.” Acad. Manage. Rev. 14 (4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557.
European Commission. 2021. “EU taxonomy for sustainable activities.” European Commission. Accessed November 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/sustainable-finance/eu-taxonomy-sustainable-activities_en.
FRI og Danske ARK. 2012. “Byggeri og Planlægning 2012.” Foren. Af Rådgivende Ingeniører, 1–38.
Grabher, G. 2002. “Cool projects, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context.” Reg. Stud. 36 (3): 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400220122025.
GxN and SBi (Danish Building Research Institute). 2018. Guide to sustainable building certifications. Denmark: SBi and GXN.
Hobday, M. 2000. “The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?” Res. Policy 29 (7–8): 871–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00110-4.
Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing, 129–140. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kvale, S., and S. Brinkmann. 2015. Interview—det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk. Copenhagen, Denmark: Gyldendal.
Labuschagne, C., and A. C. Brent. 2005. “Sustainable project life cycle management: The need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector.” Int. J. Project Manage. 23 (2): 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.003.
Lundin, R. A., and A. Söderholm. 1995. “A theory of the temporary organization.” Scand. J. Manage. 11 (4): 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U.
MacArthur Foundation. 2015. Potential for Denmark as a circular economy. Cowes, UK: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
Macmillan, S., J. Steele, P. Kirby, R. Spence, and S. Austin. 2002. “Mapping the design process during the conceptual phase of building projects.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 9 (3): 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb021213.
Marcelino-Sádaba, S., L. F. González-Jaen, and A. Pérez-Ezcurdia. 2015. “Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition.” J. Cleaner Prod. 99: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020.
Morris, P. W. 2013. “Reconstructing project management.” Int. J. Manag. Project Bus. 7 (1): 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2013-0057.
Pearce, A. R., S. Shenoy, C. M. Fiori, and Z. Winters. 2010. “The state of sustainability best practices in construction: A benchmark study.” J. Green Build. 5 (3): 116–130. https://doi.org/10.3992/jgb.5.3.116.
Rahdari, A. H., and A. A. Anvary Rostamy. 2015. “Designing a general set of sustainability indicators at the corporate level.” J. Cleaner Prod. 108: 757–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.108.
Schröpfer, V. L. M., J. Tah, and E. Kurul. 2017. “Mapping the knowledge flow in sustainable construction project teams using social network analysis.” Eng. Constr. Archit. Manage. 24 (2): 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-08-2015-0124.
Silvius, G., and R. Schipper. 2018. “Four strategic postures for sustainability in the project-based organization.” In Green production strategies for sustainability, edited by S.-B. Tsai, B. Liu, and Y. Li, 259–280. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Smyth, E., and F. Vanclay. 2017. “The social framework for projects: A conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects.” Impact Assess. Project Appraisal 35 (1): 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2016.1271539.
Statistik, D. 2020. Gør verdensmål til vores mål 197 danske målepunkter for en mere bæredygtig verden. København, Denmark: Danmarks Statistik. 2030-panelet.
Thiry, M., and M. Deguire. 2007. “Recent developments in project-based organisations.” Int. J. Project Manage. 25 (7): 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.001.
Trafik- og Byggestyrelsen. 2016. Bæredygtigt byggeri. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Housing and Planning Authority.
Turner, J. R., and R. Müller. 2003. “On the nature of the project as a temporary organization.” Int. J. Project Manage. 21 (3): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00020-0.
Willard, B. 2005. The next sustainability wave: Building boardroom buy-in. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.
Wright, R., and M. Stein. 2004. “Snowball sampling.” In Encyclopedia of social measurement, edited by W. Paul Vogt, 495–500. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Yin, R. K. 2014. Case study research: Design and method. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 28 • Issue 3 • September 2022
Copyright
© 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Feb 22, 2021
Accepted: Apr 8, 2022
Published online: Jun 22, 2022
Published in print: Sep 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Nov 22, 2022
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Mahmoud Ershadi, Marcus Jefferies, Peter Davis, Mohammad Mojtahedi, Modeling the Capabilities of High-Performing Project Management Offices in General Contracting Companies, Project Management Journal, 10.1177/87569728221148666, (875697282211486), (2023).