Case Studies
Feb 23, 2022

Visual Discomfort Analysis as a Tool to Support Façade Shading Design: A Case Study in the Architectural Design Studio

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 28, Issue 2

Abstract

While daylight admittance in educational buildings is of high importance, the associated visual discomfort issues can negatively impact student productivity and well-being. This paper reports the outcomes of a case study of the architectural studios at Al-Azhar University, Cairo, where visual discomfort due to daylight intrusion was reported by 49% of the students, leading to difficulties while performing multiple vertical and horizontal tasks. To address this issue, visual discomfort simulation analyses were conducted for 78 view positions with respect to façade shading systems (fixed shading and dynamic electrochromic glazing). To predict the level of visual discomfort for multiple view targets, three indicators, horizontal illuminance, vertical-eye illuminance, and daylight glare probability, were used. A simulation workflow of daylight and glare was developed to shade each dynamic window individually whenever the defined criteria are met. The results showed evident reductions in the hours of visual discomfort based on the three indicators from 83%, 84%, and 37% to 8%, 19%, and 3%, respectively (southwest), and from 57%, 71%, and 13% to 2%, 10%, and 1%, respectively (northeast). The proposed simulation workflow can be used in future practices to improve façade-shading performance to protect against visual discomfort under similar climatic contexts.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The first author is funded by a full scholarship from the Ministry of Higher Education of the Arab Republic of Egypt.

References

Abdelwahab, S., M. Mayhoub, and A. Elkordy. 2018. “Sunlight directing system: The effect of surface topology on daylighting.” In Proc., Int. Conf. for Sustainable Design of the Built Environment, 159–170. London: SDBE.
Berardi, U., and K. Anaraki. 2018. “The benefits of light shelves over the daylight illuminance in office buildings in Toronto.” Indoor Built Environ. 27 (2): 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X16673413.
Bian, Y., and T. Luo. 2017. “Investigation of visual comfort metrics from subjective responses in China: A study in offices with daylight.” Build. Environ. 123: 661–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.07.035.
Boyce, P. R. 2014. Human factors in lighting. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Chinazzo, G., M. Plourde, J. Pereira, J. Wienold, and M. Andersen. 2017. “Sensitivity analysis of visual and thermal parameters for energy savings: Combining illuminance and temperature set-points for possible trade-offs.” In Proc., Conf. of Building Simulation, 1573–1582. International Building Performance Simulation Association.
Da Silva, P. C., V. Leal, and M. Andersen. 2012. “Influence of shading control patterns on the energy assessment of office spaces.” Energy Build. 50: 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.019.
Day, J. K., B. Futrell, R. Cox, S. N. Ruiz, A. Amirazar, A. H. Zarrabi, and M. Azarbayjani. 2019. “Blinded by the light: Occupant perceptions and visual comfort assessments of three dynamic daylight control systems and shading strategies.” Build. Environ. 154: 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.037.
Heschong, L., and D. Mahone. 2003. Windows and classrooms: A study of student performance and the indoor environment. Sacramento, CA: California Energy Commission, 37.
Hopkinson, R. G. 1972. “Glare from daylighting in buildings.” Appl. Ergon. 3 (4): 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(72)90102-0.
IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America). 2011. The lighting handbook: Reference and application. New York: IESNA.
IESNA (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America). 2012. IES spatial daylight autonomy (sDA) and annual sunlight exposure (ASE). New York: IESNA Lighting Measurement.
Inkarojrit, V. 2005. Balancing comfort: Occupants’ control of window blinds in private offices. Berkeley, CA: Architecture, Univ. of California.
Inoue, T., T. Kawase, T. Ibamoto, S. Takakusa, and Y. Matsuo. 1988. “The development of an optimal control system for window shading devices based on investigations in office buildings.” ASHRAE Trans. 94: 1034–1049.
Ishac, M., and W. Nadim. 2021. “Standardization of optimization methodology of daylighting and shading strategy: A case study of an architectural design studio–The German University in Cairo, Egypt.” J. Build. Perform. Simul. 14 (1): 52–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19401493.2020.1846618.
Jakubiec, J. A., and C. F. Reinhart. 2011. “DIVA 2.0: Integrating daylight and thermal simulations using Rhinoceros 3D, Daysim and EnergyPlus.” In Proc., Building Simulation, 2202–2209. International Building Performance Simulation Association.
Jakubiec, J. A., C. F. Reinhart, and K. Van Den Wymelenberg. 2015. “Towards an integrated framework for predicting visual comfort conditions from luminance-based metrics in perimeter daylit spaces.” In Proc.,Conf. of Building Simulation, 1189–1196.
Jakubiec, J. A., and C. F. Reinhart. 2012. “The ‘adaptive zone’–A concept for assessing discomfort glare throughout daylit spaces.” Light. Res. Technol. 44 (2): 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153511420097.
Jones, N. L., and C. F. Reinhart. 2017. “Experimental validation of ray tracing as a means of image-based visual discomfort prediction.” Build. Environ. 113: 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.023.
Karlsen, L., P. Heiselberg, I. Bryn, and H. Johra. 2015. “Verification of simple illuminance based measures for indication of discomfort glare from windows.” Build. Environ. 92: 615–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.040.
Katsifaraki, A., B. Bueno, and T. E. Kuhn. 2017. “A daylight optimized simulation-based shading controller for venetian blinds.” Build. Environ. 126: 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.003.
Kim, J. H., Y. J. Park, M. S. Yeo, and K. W. Kim. 2009. “An experimental study on the environmental performance of the automated blind in summer.” Build. Environ. 44 (7): 1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.08.006.
Konstantzos, I., and A. Tzempelikos. 2014. “Daylight glare probability measurements and correlation with indoor illuminances in a full-scale office with dynamic shading controls.” In Proc., Int. High Performance Buildings Conf. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
Konstantzos, I., A. Tzempelikos, and Y. C. Chan. 2015. “Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades.” Build. Environ. 87: 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.007.
Lampert, C. M. 1998. “Smart switchable glazing for solar energy and daylight control.” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 52 (3–4): 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(97)00279-1.
Lee, E. S., and S. E. Selkowitz. 1995. “The design and evaluation of integrated envelope and lighting control strategies for commercial buildings.” ASHRAE Trans. 101 (1): 326–342.
Liggett, R., M. Milne, C. Gomez, D. Leeper, A. Benson, and Y. Bhattacharya. 2016. Climate consultant 6.0. Los Angeles: Murray Milne.
Lindsay, C.R.T., and P. J. Littlefair. 1993. Occupant use of venetian blinds in offices. PD 233/92. Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment.
Lubis, A., B. Hamid, I. Pane, and B. Marpaung. 2018. “Analysis of facility needs level in architecture studio for students’ studio grades.” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 126 (1): 012006.
Nezamdoost, A., and K. Van Den Wymelenberg. 2017. “Blindswitch 2017: Proposing a new manual blind control algorithm for daylight and energy simulation.” In Proc., IES Annual Conf., 211–231. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society.
Oh, M. H., K. H. Lee, and J. H. Yoon. 2012. “Automated control strategies of inside slat-type blind considering visual comfort and building energy performance.” Energy Build. 55: 728–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.09.019.
Plympton, P., S. Conway, and K. Epstein. 2000. Daylighting in schools: Improving student performance and health at a price schools can afford. Rep. CP-550-28059. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Rea, M. S. 1984. “Window blind occlusion: A pilot study.” Build. Environ. 19 (2): 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(84)90038-6.
Reinhart, C. F. 2014. Daylighting handbook: Fundamentals, designing with the Sun, edited by R. Stein. Cambridge, MA: Building Technology Press.
Reinhart, C. F., and K. Voss. 2003. “Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds.” Light. Res. Technol. 35 (3): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782803li064oa.
Reinhart, C. F., and O. Walkenhorst. 2001. “Validation of dynamic RADIANCE-based daylight simulations for a test office with external blinds.” Energy Build. 33 (7): 683–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00058-5.
Sabry, H., A. Sherif, M. Gadelhak, and M. Aly. 2014. “Balancing the daylighting and energy performance of solar screens in residential desert buildings: Examination of screen axial rotation and opening aspect ratio.” Sol. Energy 103: 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.02.025.
Selkowitz, S. E., M. Rubin, E. Lee, and R. Sullivan. 1994. “Electrochromic window performance factors.” In Vol. 2255 of Optical Materials Technology for Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Conversion XIII, 226–248. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Shafavi, N. S., M. Tahsildoost, and Z. S. Zomorodian. 2020. “Investigation of illuminance-based metrics in predicting occupants’ visual comfort (case study: Architecture design studios).” Sol. Energy 197: 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.051.
Sherif, A., H. Sabry, R. Arafa, and A. Wagdy. 2014. “Energy efficient hospital patient room design: Effect of room shape on window-to-wall ratio in a desert climate.” In Proc., 30th Int. PLEA Conf.: Sustainable Habitat for Developing Societies–Choosing the Way Forward, 352–360. Hong Kong: Passive and Low Energy Architecture.
Sherif, A., H. Sabry, and T. Rakha. 2012. “External perforated solar screens for daylighting in residential desert buildings: Identification of minimum perforation percentages.” Sol. Energy 86 (6): 1929–1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.029.
Shishegar, N., and M. Boubekri. 2016. “Natural light and productivity: Analyzing the impacts of daylighting on students’ and workers’ health and alertness.” J. Adv. Chem. Eng., & Biol. Sci. (IJACEBS) 3 (1): 72–77.
Singh, R., I. Lazarus, and V. Kishore. 2016. “Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of energy and visual performances of office building with external venetian blind shading in hot-dry climate.” Appl. Energy 184: 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.007.
Sullivan, R., E. Lee, K. Papamichael, M. Rubin, and S. E. Selkowitz. 1994. “Effect of switching control strategies on the energy performance of electrochromic windows.” In Optical Materials Technology for Energy Efficiency and Solar Energy Conversion XIII, 443–455. Bellingham, WA: International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Sutter, Y., D. Dumortier, and M. Fontoynont. 2006. “The use of shading systems in VDU task offices: A pilot study.” Energy Build. 38 (7): 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.010.
Tregenza, P., and J. Mardaljevic. 2018. “Daylighting buildings: Standards and the needs of the designer.” Light. Res. Technol. 50 (1): 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153517740611.
Tzempelikos, A., and H. Shen. 2013. “Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance.” Build. Environ. 67: 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.016.
Van Den Berg, P., E. M. Schechter-Perkins, R. S. Jack, I. Epshtein, R. Nelson, E. Oster, and W. Branch-Elliman. 2021. “Effectiveness of 3 versus 6 ft of physical distancing for controlling spread of coronavirus disease 2019 among primary and secondary students and staff: A retrospective, statewide cohort study.” Clin. Infect. Dis. 73 (10): 1871–1878.
Van Den Wymelenberg, K. 2012. “Patterns of occupant interaction with window blinds: A literature review.” Energy Build. 51: 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.008.
Van Den Wymelenberg, K., and M. Inanici. 2014. “A critical investigation of common lighting design metrics for predicting human visual comfort in offices with daylight.” Leukos 10 (3): 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2014.881720.
Wagdy, A., and F. Fathy. 2015. “A parametric approach for achieving optimum daylighting performance through solar screens in desert climates.” Build. Eng. 3: 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.07.007.
Wienold, J. 2007. “Dynamic simulation of blind control strategies for visual comfort and energy balance analysis.” In Proc., Conf. of Building Simulation, 1197–1204. Beijing: IBPSA.
Wienold, J. 2009. “Dynamic daylight glare evaluation.” In Proc., of Building Simulation, 944–951. Beijing: IBPSA.
Wienold, J., and J. Christoffersen. 2006. “Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras.” Energy Build. 38 (7): 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017.
Wienold, J., F. Frontini, S. Herkel, and S. Mende. 2011. “Climate based simulation of different shading device systems for comfort and energy demand.” In Proc., 12th Conf., of International Building Performance Simulation Association. Melbourne, Australia: IBPSA.
Wienold, J., T. Iwata, M. Sarey Khanie, E. Erell, E. Kaftan, R. G. Rodriguez, J. A. Yamin Garretón, T. Tzempelikos, I. Konstantzos, and J. Christoffersen. 2019. “Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics.” Light. Res. Technol. 51 (7): 983–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153519826003.
Wu, W., and E. Ng. 2003. “A review of the development of daylighting in schools.” Light. Res. Technol. 35 (2): 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1191/1477153503li072oa.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 28Issue 2June 2022

History

Received: Aug 17, 2021
Accepted: Dec 17, 2021
Published online: Feb 23, 2022
Published in print: Jun 1, 2022
Discussion open until: Jul 23, 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sahar Abdelwahab, Ph.D. [email protected]
Lecturer, Al-Azhar Univ., Faculty of Engineering, Architecture Dept., Nasr City Campus, Cairo 11371, Egypt (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Hesham Sobh, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Al-Azhar Univ., Faculty of Engineering, Architecture Dept., Nasr City Campus, Cairo 11371, Egypt. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share