Energy and Daylight Optimization of Shading Devices, Window Size, and Orientation for Educational Spaces in Tehran, Iran
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27, Issue 2
Abstract
Optimization of window characteristics is crucial for achieving maximum daylighting while reducing energy loads in educational spaces. This research investigated the impacts of a building's window orientation, window-to-wall ratio, and different shading settings on daylighting, glare, and energy usage in an educational space in the mixed climate of Tehran, Iran, by analyzing the information obtained from climate-based simulations. The research results emphasized the need for window system configuration to be considered in the early design stages as each parameter impinges on design decisions, such as window orientation or even running schedules of spaces. In addition to evaluating the connection between parameters, suggestions are provided for each examined orientation, window size, and date. Results indicated that it is possible to reduce glare up to 68%, increase daylighting up to 70%, and save energy up to 59%. Simultaneous consideration of various design objectives in this study provides a framework to be adopted and further refined by other researchers and designers to support their design decision making.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
References
Acosta, I., C. Munoz, M. A. Campano, and J. Navarro. 2015. “Analysis of daylight factors and energy saving allowed by windows under overcast sky conditions.” Renewable Energy 77: 194–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.017.
Aizlewood, M. 1993. “Innovative daylighting systems: An experimental evaluation.” Light. Res. Technol. 25 (4): 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/096032719302500401.
Alhagla, K., A. Mansour, and R. Elbassuoni. 2019. “Optimizing windows for enhancing daylighting performance and energy saving.” Alexandria Eng. J. 58 (1): 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.01.004.
Apritasari, Y. D. 2017. “Optimization design of light shelf for visual comfort and energy savings in an office space.” In ECEEE 2017 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency Belambra Les Criques, 1237–1242. West Jakarta, Indonesia: Podomoro Univ.
Ashrafian, T., and N. Moazzen. 2019. “The impact of glazing ratio and window configuration on occupants’ comfort and energy demand: The case study of a school building in Eskisehir, Turkey.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 47: 101483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101483.
Ayoub, M. 2019. “100 years of daylighting: A chronological review of daylight prediction and calculation methods.” Sol. Energy 194: 360–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.072.
Babu, S., et al. 2019. “Investigation of an integrated automated blinds and dimmable lighting system for tropical climate in a rotatable testbed facility.” Energy Build. 183: 356–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.007.
Baker, N., and K. Steemers. 2017. Daylight design of buildings: A handbook for architects and engineers paperback. London: Routledge.
Balador, Z., F. Imani, and M. Gjerde. 2017. “Evaluation of different shading devices for a Tehran primary school classroom.” In PLEA Conf., 1–8. Edinburgh, UK: The University of Edinburgh.
Barrett, P., F. Davies, Y. Zhang, and L. Barrett. 2015. “The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multilevel analysis.” Build. Environ. 89: 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013.
Bellia, L., C. Marino, F. Minichiello, and A. Pedace. 2014. “An overview on solar shading systems for buildings.” Energy Procedia 62: 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.12.392.
Bian, Y., and Y. Ma. 2017. “Analysis of daylight metrics of side-lit room in Canton, South China: A comparison between daylight autonomy and daylight factor.” Energy Build. 138: 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.059.
Boyce, P., C. Hunter, and O. Howlett. 2003. The benefits of daylight through windows. New York: Lighting Research Center.
BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method). 2016. BREEAM international new construction 2016: Technical manual. Watford, UK: Building Research Establishment.
BSI (British Standards Institution). 2019. BS EN 17037:2018: Daylight in buildings. London, UK: BSI.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2011. Light and lighting. lighting of work places-Part1: Indoor work places. EN 12464-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
CIBSE (Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers). 2011. LG05: Lighting for education. London: CIBSE.
Costanzo, V., G. Evola, and L. Marletta. 2017. “A review of daylighting strategies in schools: State of the art and expected future trends.” Buildings 7 (2): 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7020041.
DiLaura, D. L., K. W. Houser, R. G. Mistrick, and G. R. Steffy. 2011. The lighting handbook. 10th ed. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society.
Echenagucia, T. M., A. Capozzoli, Y. Cascone, and M. Sassone. 2015. “The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis.” Appl. Energy 154: 577–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.090.
Fang, Y., and S. Cho. 2019. “Design optimization of building geometry and fenestration for daylighting and energy performance.” Sol. Energy 191: 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.039.
Feng, G., D. Chi, X. Xu, B. Dou, Y. Sun, and Y. Fu. 2017. “Study on the influence of window–wall ratio on the energy consumption of nearly zero energy buildings.” Procedia Eng. 205: 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.003.
Freewan, A. A. Y., and J. A. Al Dalala. 2020. “Assessment of daylight performance of advanced daylighting strategies in large university classrooms; case study classrooms at JUST.” Alexandria Eng. J. 59 (2): 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.049.
Galal, K. S. 2019. “The impact of classroom orientation on daylight and heat-gain performance in the Lebanese Coastal zone.” Alexandria Eng. J. 58 (3): 827–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.07.003.
Goia, F. 2016. “Search for the optimal window-to-wall ratio in office buildings in different European climates and the implications on total energy saving potential.” Sol. Energy 132: 467–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.03.031.
Halverson, M., R. Hart, and W. Athalye. 2014. Determination of energy savings: Quantitative analysis. ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1-2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Energy.
Hammad, A., A. Akbarnezhad, H. Grzybowska, P. Wu, and X. Wang. 2019. “Mathematical optimisation of location and design of windows by considering energy performance, lighting and privacy of buildings.” Smart Sustainable Built Environ. 8 (2): 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-11-2017-0070.
Ho, M.-C., C.-M. Chiang, P.-C. Chou, K.-F. Chang, and C.-Y. Lee. 2008. “Optimal sun-shading design for enhanced daylight illumination of subtropical classrooms.” Energy Build. 40 (10): 1844–1855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.04.012.
ICC (International Code Council). 2018. 2018 international green construction code. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE.
Kirimtat, A., B. K. Koyunbaba, I. Chatzikonstantinou, and S. Sariyildiz. 2016. “Review of simulation modeling for shading devices in buildings.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 53: 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.020.
Kirimtat, A., O. Krejcar, B. Ekicib, and M. F. Tasgetiren. 2019. “Multi-objective energy and daylight optimization of amorphous shading devices in buildings.” Sol. Energy 185: 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.048.
Konstantoglou, M., and A. Tsangrassoulis. 2016. “Dynamic operation of daylighting and shading systems: A literature review.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 60: 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.246.
Kontadakis, A., A. Tsangrassoulis, L. Doulos, and S. Zerefos. 2018. “A review of light shelf designs for daylit environments.” Sustainability 10 (1): 71.
Koti, R., and M. Munshi. 2009. “Daylighting analysis of a classroom space using BIM geometry and next generation metrics.” In Proc., 38th ASES National Solar Conf., 1–26. Colorado, CO: American Solar Energy Society (ASES).
Kunwar, N., K. S. Cetin, U. Passe, X. Zhou, and Y. Li. 2019. “Full-scale experimental testing of integrated dynamically-operated roller shades and lighting in perimeter office spaces.” Sol. Energy 186: 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.069.
Kunwar, N., K. S. Cetin, U. Passe, X. Zhou, and Y. Li. 2020. “Energy savings and daylighting evaluation of dynamic venetian blinds and lighting through full-scale experimental testing.” Energy 197: 117190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117190.
Ladybug Tools. 2018 “Ladybug tools.” Accessed 21 October 2018. https://www.ladybug.tools/.
Lee, J. W., H. J. Jung, J. Y. Park, J. B. Lee, and Y. Yoon. 2013. “Optimization of building window system in asian regions by analyzing solar heat gain and daylighting elements.” Renewable Energy 50: 522–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.029.
Mangkuto, R. A., F. Feradi, R. E. Putra, R. T. Atmodipoero, and F. Favero. 2018. “Optimisation of daylight admission based on modifications of light shelf design parameters.” J. Build. Eng. 18: 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.03.007.
Meresi, A. 2016. “Evaluating daylight performance of light shelves combined with external blinds in south-facing classrooms in Athens, Greece.” Energy Build. 116: 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.01.009.
Michael, A., and C. Heracleous. 2017. “Assessment of natural lighting performance and visual comfort of educational architecture in Southern Europe: The case of typical educational school premises in Cyprus.” Energy Build. 140: 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.087.
Moazzeni, M. H., and Z. Ghiabaklou. 2016. “Investigating the influence of light shelf geometry parameters on daylight performance and visual comfort, a case study of educational space in Tehran, Iran.” Buildings 6 (3): 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings6030026.
Nabil, A., and J. Mardaljevic. 2005. “Useful daylight illuminance: A new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings.” Light. Res. Technol. 37 (1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782805li128oa.
Penny, J. 2017. “How light shelves maximize daylighting: Bring natural light further into your building.” Accessed November 7, 2018. https://www.buildings.com/article-details/articleid/21318/title/how-light-shelves-maximize-daylighting.
Pilechiha, P., M. Mahdavinejad, F. Pour Rahimian, P. Carnemolla, and S. Seyedzadeh. 2020. “Multi-objective optimisation framework for designing office windows: Quality of view, daylight and energy efficiency.” Appl. Energy 261: 114356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356.
Reinhart, C. F., T. Rakha, and D. Weissman. 2014. “Predicting the Daylit area—A comparison of students assessments and simulations at eleven schools of architecture.” LEUKOS 10 (4): 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2014.929007.
Reinhart, C. F., and K. Voss. 2003. “Monitoring manual control of electric lighting and blinds.” Light. Res. Technol. 35 (3): 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782803li064oa.
Rubeis, T.d., I. Nardi, M. Muttillo, S. Ranieri, and D. Ambrosini. 2018. “Room and window geometry influence for daylight harvesting maximization–Effects on energy savings in an academic classroom.” Energy Procedia 148: 1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.050.
Sadeghipour Roudsari, M., and M. Pak. 2013. “Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design.” In Proc., 13th Int. IBPSA Conf., 3128–3135. International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA)
Secchi, S., F. Sciurpi, L. Pierangioli, and M. Randazzo. 2015. “Retrofit strategies for the improvement of visual comfort and energy performance of classrooms with large windows exposed to East.” Energy Procedia 78: 3144–3149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.771.
Shafavi, N. S., M. Tahsildoost, and Z. S. Zomorodian. 2020. “Investigation of illuminance-based metrics in predicting occupants’ visual comfort (case study: Architecture design studios).” Sol. Energy 197: 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.12.051.
Tsikra, P., and E. Andreou. 2017. “Investigation of the energy saving potential in existing school buildings in Greece. The role of shading and daylight strategies in visual comfort and energy saving.” Procedia Environ. Sci. 38: 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.107.
USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council). 2019. LEED v4 for building design and construction. Washington, DC: USGBC.
Vaisi, S., and F. Kharvari. 2019. “Evaluation of daylight regulations in buildings using daylight factor analysis method by radiance.” Energy Sustainable Dev. 49: 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2019.02.002.
Xue, P., Q. Li, J. Xie, M. Zhao, and J. Liu. 2019. “Optimization of window-to-wall ratio with sunshades in China low latitude region considering daylighting and energy saving requirements.” Appl. Energy 233–234: 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.027.
Xue, P., C. M. Mak, H. D. Cheung, and J. Chao. 2015. “Post-occupancy evaluation of sunshades and balconies’ effects on luminous comfort through a questionnaire survey.” Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 37 (1): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624415596472.
Yong Suk, J., M. Schiler, and K. Kensek. 2016. “Discomfort glare metrics: Investigating their accuracy and consistency in daylight glare evaluation by using human subject study data.” In Facade Tectonics World Congress. Newington, CT: Facade Tectonics Institute.
Zhang, A., R. Bokel, A. van den Dobbelsteen, Y. Sun, Q. Huang, and Q. Zhang. 2017. “Optimization of thermal and daylight performance of school buildings based on a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the cold climate of China.” Energy Build. 139: 371–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.048.
Zomorodian, M., M. Tahsildoost, and S. S. Korsavi. 2016. “The effect of window configuration on daylight performance in classrooms: A field and simulation study.” Int. J. Archit. Urban Plann. 26 (1): 15–24.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 27 • Issue 2 • June 2021
Copyright
© 2021 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 4, 2020
Accepted: Jan 6, 2021
Published online: Mar 25, 2021
Published in print: Jun 1, 2021
Discussion open until: Aug 25, 2021
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
Cited by
- Ehsan Sorooshnia, Maria Rashidi, Payam Rahnamayiezekavat, Bijan Samali, Optimizing Window Configuration Counterbalancing Energy Saving and Indoor Visual Comfort for Sydney Dwellings, Buildings, 10.3390/buildings12111823, 12, 11, (1823), (2022).
- Bo Hong, Simulation research on optimal extraction of architectural image features based on image sequence, 2022 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers, 10.1145/3544109.3544388, (950-954), (2022).
- Simeng Li, Yanqiu Cui, Nerija Banaitienė, Chunlu Liu, Mark B. Luther, Sensitivity Analysis for Carbon Emissions of Prefabricated Residential Buildings with Window Design Elements, Energies, 10.3390/en14196436, 14, 19, (6436), (2021).