Technical Papers
Jun 11, 2020

Social Welfare-Based Human Comfort Aggregation Model to Facilitate Healthy and Comfortable Indoor Environments

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 3

Abstract

A multioccupancy environment (e.g., classroom, open office space, auditorium) typically features unbalanced ambient conditions such as temperatures, humidity, CO2 levels, noise levels, and lighting conditions. It is also occupied by a large number of occupants with varying comfort requirements and preferences, making it extremely challenging to provide a collectively satisfactory environment to accommodate the comfort needs of this diverse population. This challenge is due to a lack of understanding and modeling of how to define group comfort levels based on individual comfort levels. This paper proposes a social-welfare-based human comfort aggregation model for quantifying the comfort levels of a group of occupants based on their individual comfort levels. The model accounts for the factors such as “inequality of human comfort” and “poverty of human comfort,” both of which have an impact on occupants' group comfort. A set of hypothetical and real case studies were conducted to illustrate how the proposed model can be applied in measuring the comfort levels of building occupants in different indoor environmental conditions. This research contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a new model for measuring group occupants' comfort. It provides a more explicit understanding of the relationships between group comfort and individual comfort in indoor environments. It could serve as the foundation for human-centered design and operation of buildings that offer more comfortable, healthier, and more inclusive indoor environments to building occupants.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Al horr, Y., M. Arif, M. Katafygiotou, A. Mazroei, A. Kaushik, and E. Elsarrag. 2016. “Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: A review of the literature.” Int. J. Sustainable Built Environ. 5 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.006.
Andresen, I. 2000. “A multi-criteria decision-making method for solar building design.” Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Architecture, Planning and Fine Arts Dept. of Building Technology, Norwegian Univ. of Science & Technology.
Arrow, K. J. 1951. Social choice and individual values. New Heaven, CT: Cowles Foundation, Yale Univ.
Arrow, K. J. 1963. Social choice and individual values. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
Atkinson, A., and A. Brandolini. 2010. “On analyzing the world distribution of income.” World Bank Econ. Rev. 24 (1): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhp020.
Aye, L., W. W. S. Charters, M. Chiazor, and J. R. W. Robinson. 2005. “Evaluation of occupant perception and satisfaction in two new office buildings.” Post Carbon World ANZSES 2005: 1–8.
Barker, R. 1987. The social work dictionary. Silver Spring, MD: National Association of Social Workers.
Barr, N. 1998. The economics of the welfare state. 3rd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford Press.
Barreiro-Hurlé, J., and J. Gómez-Limón. 2008. “Reconsidering heterogeneity and aggregation issues in environmental valuation: A multi-attribute approach.” Environ. Resour. Econ. 40 (4): 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9169-5.
Barrios, L., and W. Kleminger. 2017. “The Comfstat—Automatically sensing thermal comfort for smart thermostats.” Accessed October 1, 2017. http://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/publ/papers/LilianaBarriosPaper.pdf.
Bellu, L. 2006. “Social welfare, social welfare functions and inequality aversion.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Accessed November 8, 2017. http://www.fao.org.
Blanc, I., D. Friot, M. Margni, and O. Jolliet. 2008. “Towards a new index for environmental sustainability based on a DALY weighting approach.” Sustainable Dev. 16 (4): 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.376.
Boulanger, P. 2008. “Sustainable development indicators: A scientific challenge, a democratic issue.” Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc. 1: 59–73. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-59-2008.
Branco, P. T. B. S., M. C. M. Alvim-Ferraz, F. G. Martins, and S. I. V. Sousa. 2019. “Quantifying indoor air quality determinants in urban and rural nursery and primary schools.” Environ. Res. 176: 108534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108534.
Campbell, D. E., and J. S. Kelly. 2002. “Impossibility theorems in the Arrovian framework.” Handbook Soc. Choice Welfare 1: 35–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80005-4.
CBE (Center for the Built Environment). 2019. “Occupant Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Survey.” Accessed January 20, 2019. https://cbe.berkeley.edu/research/occupant-survey-and-building-benchmarking/.
Claudi, L., M. Arnesano, P. Chiariotti, G. Battista, and G. M. Revel. 2019. “A soft-sensing approach for the evaluation of the acoustic comfort due to building envelope protection against external noise.” Measurement 146: 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.07.003.
Cosma, A. C., and R. Simha. 2018. “Thermal comfort modeling in transient conditions using real-time local body temperature extraction with a thermographic camera.” Build. Environ. 143: 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.06.052.
Day, J. K., B. Futrell, R. Cox, S. N. Ruiz, A. Amirazar, A. H. Zarrabi, and M. Azarbayjani. 2019. “Blinded by the light: Occupant perceptions and visual comfort assessments of three dynamic daylight control systems and shading strategies.” Build. Environ. 154: 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.037.
de la Garza, J., A. Prateapusanond, and N. Ambani. 2007. “Preallocation of total float in the application of a critical path method based construction contract.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 133 (11): 836–845. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:11(836).
de Lazari-Radek, K., and P. Singer. 2017. Utilitarianism: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
Feldman, A., and R. Serrano. 2006. Welfare economics and social choice theory. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Gelormino, E., G. Melis, C. Marietta, and G. Costa. 2015. “From built environment to health inequalities: An explanatory framework based on evidence.” Preventive Med. Rep. 2: 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.019.
Ghahramani, A., C. Tang, and B. Becerik-Gerber. 2015. “An online learning approach for quantifying personalized thermal comfort via adaptive stochastic modeling.” Build. Environ. 92: 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.04.017.
Hallowell, M. 2011. “Risk-based framework for safety investment in construction organizations.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 137 (8): 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000339.
Harsanyi, J. C. 1955. “Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility.” J. Political Econ. 63 (4): 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1086/257678.
Heinkel, N. 2016. “Sick Building Syndrome: What It Is and Tips for Prevention.” Accessed July 5, 2019. https://ohsonline.com/articles/2016/10/01/sick-building-syndrome.aspx.
Janzen, C., J. Marko, and M. Schwandt. 2018. “Embedding health equity strategically within built environments.” Can. J. Public Health 109 (4): 590–597. https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-018-0116-8.
Janzen, C., M. Schwandt, and J. Marko. 2017. “Embedding health equity strategically within healthy built environments to improve walkability (breakout presentation).” J. Transp. Health 7: S43–S44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.072.
Jung, W., and F. Jazizadeh. 2018. “Vision-based thermal comfort quantification for HVAC control.” Build. Environ. 142: 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.018.
Karjalainen, S. 2007. “Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments.” Build. Environ. 42 (4): 1594–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.01.009.
Karjalainen, S., and O. Koistinen. 2007. “User problems with individual temperature control in offices.” Build. Environ. 42 (8): 2880–2887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.031.
Lee, J.-H., J. Moon, and S. Kim. 2014. “Analysis of occupants” visual perception to refine indoor lighting environment for office tasks.” Energies 7 (7): 4116–4139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7074116.
Li, D., C. C. Menassa, and V. R. Kamat. 2017. “Personalized human comfort in indoor building environments under diverse conditioning modes.” Build. Environ. 126: 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.004.
Li, D., C. C. Menassa, and V. R. Kamat. 2018. “Non-intrusive interpretation of human thermal comfort through analysis of facial infrared thermography.” Energy Build. 176: 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.025.
List, D. 2001. “The consensus group technique in social research.” Fields Methods 13 (3): 277–290. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1525822X0101300304.
Liu, S., S. Schiavon, H. P. Das, M. Jin, and C. J. Spanos. 2019. “Personal thermal comfort models with wearable sensors.” Build. Environ. 162: 106281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106281.
Mostafa, M. A., and N. M. El-Gohary. 2014. “Stakeholder-sensitive social welfare–oriented benefit analysis for sustainable infrastructure project development.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 140 (9): 04014038. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000788.
NCCDH (National Collaborating Center for Determinants of Health). 2019. “Promoting equity in the built environment: The who, what and when.” Accessed July 1, 2019. http://nccdh.ca/blog/entry/promoting-equity-in-the-built-environment-the-who-what-and-when1#reference%204.
NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 1996. “National Occupational Research Agenda, Work Environment and Workforce.” Accessed July 15, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-115/worken.html.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2008. Handbook on constructing composite indicators- methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD.
Olesen, B. W., and K. C. Parsons. 2002. “Introduction to thermal comfort standards and to the proposed new version of EN ISO 7730.” Energy Build. 34 (6): 537–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00004-X.
Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Roskams, M., B. Haynes, P. J. Lee, and S. H. Park. 2019. “Acoustic comfort in open-plan offices: The role of employee characteristics.” J. Corporate Real Estate 21 (3): 254–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-02-2019-0011.
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality reexamined. 1st ed. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.
Sen, A. 1997. On economic inequality. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
SFC (Seeds for Change). 2019. “Consensus decision making.” Accessed July 11, 2019. https://www.seedsforchange.org.uk/consensus#benefits.
Stoesz, D. 1989. “A theory of social welfare.” Soc. Work 34 (2): 101–107.
Tam, T. 2018. “Statement from Dr. Theresa Tam, Chief Public Health Officer of Canada.” Accessed July 2, 2019. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/news/2018/01/statement_from_drtheresatamchiefpublichealthofficerofcanada.html.
Tresch, R. W. 2008. Public sector economics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Turrell, G., M. Haynes, L. A. Wilson, and B. Giles-Corti. 2013. “Can the built environment reduce health inequalities? A study of neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and walking for transport.” Health Place 19: 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.10.008.
US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2019a. Indoor air facts No.4 sick building syndrome. Air and Radiation (6609J), Research and development (MD-56). Washington, DC: US EPA.
US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2019b. “Controlling Pollutants and Sources: Indoor Air Quality Design Tools for Schools.” Accessed January 12, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/iaq-schools/controlling-pollutants-and-sources-indoor-air-quality-design-tools-schools#Carpet.
USGBC (US Green Building Council). 2013. Health is a human right. Green building Can help. Washington, DC: USGBC.
Wang, Z., R. de Dear, M. Luo, B. Lin, Y. He, A. Ghahramani, and Y. Zhu. 2018. “Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review.” Build. Environ. 138: 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.040.
WBDG (Whole Building Design Guide). 2017. “Elementary School.” Accessed December 12, 2018. https://www.wbdg.org/building-types/education-facilities/elementary-school.
WBDG (Whole building design guide). 2018. “Enhance Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ).” Accessed January 12, 2019. https://www.wbdg.org/design-objectives/sustainable/enhance-indoor-environmental-quality.
Wu, F., D. Jacobs, C. Mitchell, D. Miller, and M. H. Karol. 2007. “Improving indoor environmental quality for public health: Impediments and policy recommendations.” Environ. Health Perspect. 115 (6): 953–957. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8986.
Yang, Z., B. Becerik-Gerber, and L. Mino. 2013. “A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance.” Build. Environ. 70: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.08.030.
Yuan, J., Z. Chen, L. Zhong, and B. Wang. 2019. “Indoor air quality management based on fuzzy risk assessment and its case study.” Sustainable Cities Soc. 50: 101654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101654.
Zagreus, L., C. Huizenga, E. Arens, and D. Lehrer. 2004. “Listening to the occupants: A web-based indoor environmental quality survey.” Indoor Air 14 (s8): 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00301.x.
Zhang, L., and N. El-Gohary. 2016. “Discovering stakeholder values for axiology-based value analysis of building projects.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 142 (4): 04015095. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001004.
Zhang, L., N. Pradhananga, and N. D’Souza. 2018a. “Capturing human sensation using physiological sensing devices to support human-centered indoor environment design.” In Proc., 2018 Construction Research Congress, 178–188. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Zhang, W., F. Liu, and R. Fan. 2018b. “Improved thermal comfort modeling for smart buildings: A data analytics study.” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 103: 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.06.026.
Zomorodian, Z. S., and M. Tahsildoost. 2019. “Assessing the effectiveness of dynamic metrics in predicting daylight availability and visual comfort in classrooms.” Renewable Energy 134: 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.072.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26Issue 3September 2020

History

Received: Jan 29, 2019
Accepted: Mar 3, 2020
Published online: Jun 11, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Nov 11, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lu Zhang, Ph.D., A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Assistant Professor, Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustainability, Florida International Univ., 10555 West Flagler St., EC 2935, Miami, FL 33174 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Graduate Student, Moss School of Construction, Infrastructure and Sustainability, Florida International Univ., 10555 West Flagler St., Miami, FL 33174. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-6140. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share