Technical Papers
Apr 7, 2020

Structural Behavior of Sandwich Beams with Flax Fiber–Reinforced Polymer Faces and Cardboard Cores under Monotonic and Impact Loads

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26, Issue 2

Abstract

To meet the ever-increasing demand for more environmentally conscious building designs, it is important that sustainable building material options be available. Natural and recycled materials can be used in sandwich panels to reduce their environmental footprint. This study featured experiments with 12 sandwich beams constructed with flax fiber–reinforced polymer (FFRP) faces and recycled corrugated cardboard cores under monotonic and impact loading. Each sandwich beam was 1,200 mm long and 150 mm wide, and was constructed of two-layer FFRP faces and a 75-mm-thick corrugated cardboard core. Six specimens were prepared using a plain cardboard core and six with a waxed cardboard core. Two separate test methods were employed in this study: a three-point bending test and a drop-weight impact test. Three specimens of each type with a span length of 1,120 mm of each type were tested under monotonic load. The load was applied through a 150-mm-wide steel hollow structural section (HSS) and was measured with a 250 kN load cell. The midspan deflection was measured with a string potentiometer, and the strains in the top and bottom faces at midspan were measured using strain gauges. The monotonic test data were recorded at a rate of 10 Hz. Three specimens of each type were tested under a drop-weight impact load. The drop weight was applied to the midspan. To match the monotonic tests, the drop weight was affixed with a 150 mm HSS loading surface. The midspan displacement was measured with a fast-action string potentiometer, and the midspan face strains were measured using strain gauges. The impact data were recorded at a rate of 25 kHz. In addition, each impact test was filmed with high-speed video (500 frames per second). The residual monotonic flexural behavior after impact was also investigated for specimens that survived the impact testing (that is, they were additionally tested under monotonic three-point bending). The results of the tests were compared with the results of similar tests on sandwich beams with conventional petroleum-based foam cores and showed that the cardboard core beams behaved similarly to the foam core beams. It was determined that core manufacturing and specimen preparation had a significant effect on the overall specimen behavior and potentially caused premature failure in some of the tests. The residual monotonic tests of the specimens after impact showed that there was no significant reduction in specimen strength or stiffness after an impact event. Existing models used for predicting the behavior of foam-core FFRP sandwich beams were used to predict the behavior of the cardboard specimens tested in this study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lauren MacDonnell, Yuchen Fu, Jesse Keane, Brian Kennedy, and Jordan Maerz for their assistance in the lab. The authors would also like to acknowledge and thank NSERC, Queen's University, and Dalhousie University for their financial support, and Maritime Paper (Dartmouth, NS, Canada) for their in-kind contribution.

References

Allen, H. G. 1969. Analysis and structural design of sandwich panels. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.
Anderson, T., and E. Madenci. 2000. “Experimental investigation of low-velocity impact characteristics of sandwich composites.” Compos. Struct. 50 (3): 239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00098-2.
Andrews, E. W., and N. A. Moussa. 2009. “Failure mode maps for composite sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading.” Int. J. Impact Eng. 36 (3): 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.08.005.
Asdrubali, F., A. L. Pisello, F. D’Alessandro, F. Bianchi, C. Fabiani, M. Cornicchia, and A. Rotili. 2016. “Experimental and numerical characterization of innovative cardboard-based panels: Thermal and acoustic performance analysis and life cycle assessment.” Build. Environ. 95: 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.09.003.
ASTM. 2005. Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event. ASTM D7136. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
ASTM. 2017. Standard test methods for flexural properties of unreinforced and reinforced plastics and electrical insulating materials. ASTM D790. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
Atas, C., and U. Potoglu. 2016. “The effect of face-sheet thickness on low-velocity impact response of sandwich composites with foam cores.” J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 18 (2): 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636215613775.
Bensadoun, F., K. A. M. Vallons, L. B. Lessard, I. Verpoest, and A. W. Van Vuure. 2016. “Fatigue behaviour assessment of flax-epoxy composites.” Composites Part A 82: 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.003.
Betts, D., P. Sadeghian, and A. Fam. 2017. “Tensile properties of flax frp composites.” In Proc., 6th Asia-Pacific Conf. on FRP in Structures, APFIS 2017. Kingston, ON, Canada: International Institute for FRP in Construction (IIFC).
Betts, D., P. Sadeghian, and A. Fam. 2018a. “Impact behaviour of sandwich panels made of flax fiber-reinforced bio-based polymer face sheets and foam cores.” In Structures Congress 2018, 1–7. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Betts, D., P. Sadeghian, and A. Fam. 2018b. “Experimental behavior and design-oriented analysis of sandwich beams with bio-based composite facings and foam cores.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (4): 04018020. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000856.
Betts, D., P. Sadeghian, and A. Fam. 2018c. “Tensile properties of single flax fibres.” In CSCE Annual Conf., Fredericton, NB, Canada, 1–10. Montreal: CSCE.
Betts, D., P. Sadeghian, and A. Fam. 2019. “Impact behavior of sustainable sandwich panels with flax FRP faces and cardboard cores.” In AEI Conf. 2019, Tysons, Virginia, 1–6. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
Betts, D., P. Sadeghian, and A. Fam. 2020. “Erratum for experimental behavior and design-oriented analysis of sandwich beams with bio-based composite facings and foam cores.” J. Compos. Constr. 24 (1): 08219001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000994.
Boria, S., E. Raponi, F. Sarasini, J. Tirillò, and L. Lampani. 2018. “Green sandwich structures under impact: Experimental vs numerical analysis.” Proc. Struct. Integrity 12: 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.084.
Chai, G. B., and S. Zhu. 2011. “A review of low-velocity impact on sandwich structures.” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L: J. Mater. Des. Appl. 225 (4): 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420711409985.
Christian, S. J., and S. L. Billington. 2011. “Mechanical response of PHB- and cellulose acetate natural fiber-reinforced composites for construction applications.” Composites Part B 42 (7): 1920–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.039.
Codyre, L., K. Mak, and A. Fam. 2016. “Flexural and axial behaviour of sandwich panels with bio-based flax fibre-reinforced polymer skins and various foam core densities.” J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 20 (5): 595–616.
El Damatty, A. A., A. Mikhail, and A. A. Awad. 2000. “Finite element modeling and analysis of a cardboard shelter.” Thin Walled Struct. 38: 145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(00)00035-5.
Entropy Resins. 2013a. Super SAP ONE epoxy resin. Hayward, CA: Entropy Resins.
Entropy Resins. 2013b. Material safety data sheet—Super Sap CLS hardener. Hayward, CA: Entropy Resins.
Entropy Resins. 2015. Safety data sheet—Super Sap ONE epoxy resin. Hayward, CA: Entropy Resins.
Fam, A., and T. Sharaf. 2010. “Flexural performance of sandwich panels comprising polyurethane core and GFRP skins and ribs of various configurations.” Compos. Struct. 92 (12): 2927–2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.004.
Ferdous, W., A. Manalo, and T. Aravinthan. 2017. “Effect of beam orientation on the static behaviour of phenolic core sandwich composites with different shear span-to-depth ratios.” Compos. Struct. 168: 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.061.
Ferdous, W., A. Manalo, T. Aravinthan, and A. Fam. 2018a. “Flexural and shear behaviour of layered sandwich beams.” Constr. Build. Mater. 173: 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.068.
Ferdous, W., A. Manalo, G. Van Erp, T. Aravinthan, and K. Ghabraie. 2018b. “Evaluation of an innovative composite railway sleeper for a narrow-gauge track under static load.” J. Compos. Constr. 22 (2): 04017050. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000833.
Ferdous, W., Y. Bai, T. D. Ngo, A. Manalo, and P. Mendis. 2019. “New advancements, challenges and opportunities of multi-storey modular buildings—A state-of-the-art review.” Eng. Struct. 183: 883–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.01.061.
Fraile-Garcia, E., J. Ferreiro-Cabello, A. Pernia-Espinoza, and F. J. Martinez-de-Pison. 2019. “Technical–economic assessment of redesigned reinforced concrete pre-slabs: Incorporating corrugated cardboard.” Struct. Concr. 20: 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800227.
Hristozov, D., L. Wroblewski, and P. Sadeghian. 2016. “Long-term tensile properties of natural fibre-reinforced polymer composites: Comparison of flax and glass fibres.” Composites Part B 95: 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.03.079.
Mak, K., and A. Fam. 2019. “Performance of flax-FRP sandwich panels exposed to different ambient temperatures.” Constr. Build. Mater. 219: 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.118.
Mak, K., A. Fam, and C. Macdougall. 2015. “Flexural behavior of sandwich panels with bio-FRP skins made of flax fibers and epoxidized pine-oil resin.” J. Compos. Constr. 19 (6): 04015005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000560.
Mallick, P. K. 2007. Fiber-reinforced composites: Materials, manufacturing and design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Manalo, A., S. Surendar, G. van Erp, and B. Benmokrane. 2016. “Flexural behavior of an FRP sandwich system with glass-fiber skins and a phenolic core at elevated in-service temperature.” Compos. Struct. 152: 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.028.
McCracken, A., and P. Sadeghian. 2018. “Corrugated cardboard core sandwich beams with bio-based flax fiber composite skins.” J. Build. Eng. 20: 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.009.
Nguyen, M. Q., S. S. Jacombs, R. S. Thomson, D. Hachenberg, and M. L. Scott. 2005. “Simulation of impact on sandwich structures.” Compos. Struct. 67 (2): 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.018.
Paper & Paperboard Packaging Environmental Council. 2017. “PPEC Factsheet.” Accessed March 8, 2019. www.ppec-paper.com/pdfFiles/factsheets/2017/Packaging/FS03-2017.pdf.
Petras, A., and M. P. F. Sutcliffe. 1999. “Failure mode maps for honeycomb sandwich panels.” Compos. Struct. 44 (4): 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00123-8.
Pflug, J., I. Verpoest, and D. Vandepitte. 2000. “Folded honeycomb cardboard and core material for structural applications.” In Proc., 5th Int. Conf. on Sandwich Construction, 361–372. Patras, Greece: European Society for Composite Materials.
Pflug, J., F. Xinyu, B. Vangrimde, I. Verpoest, P. Bratfisch, and D. Vandepitte. 2002. “Development of a sandwich material with polypropylene/natural fibre skins and paper honeycomb core.” In Proc., 10th European Conf. on Composites Materials, 1–6. UK: EMAS Publishing.
Plagianakos, T. S., and E. G. Papadopoulos. 2014. “Low-energy impact response of composite and sandwich composite plates with piezoelectric sensory layers.” Int. J. Solids Struct. 51 (14): 2713–2727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.04.005.
Ramesh, M., K. Palanikumar, and K. H. Reddy. 2017. “Plant fibre-based bio-composites: Sustainable and renewable green materials.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 79: 558–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.094.
Sadeghian, P., D. Hristozov, and L. Wroblewski. 2016. “Experimental and analytical behavior of sandwich composite beams: Comparison of natural and synthetic materials.” J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 20 (3): 287–307.
Sadeghian, P., D. Hristozov, and L. Wroblewski. 2018. “Experimental and analytical behavior of sandwich composite beams: Comparison of natural and synthetic materials.” J. Sandwich Struct. Mater. 20 (3): 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636216649891.
Schubel, P. M., J.-J. Luo, and I. M. Daniel. 2005. “Low velocity impact behavior of composite sandwich panels.” Composites Part A 36 (10): 1389–1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.014.
Secchi, S., F. Asdrubali, G. Cellai, E. Nannipieri, A. Rotili, and I. Vannucchi. 2016. “Experimental and environmental analysis of new sound-absorbing and insulating elements in recycled cardboard.” J. Build. Eng. 5: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.10.005.
Sharaf, T., and A. Fam. 2012. “Numerical modelling of sandwich panels with soft core and different rib configurations.” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. 31 (11): 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684412445494.
Sharaf, T., W. Shawkat, and A. Fam. 2010. “Structural performance of sandwich wall panels with different foam core densities in one-way bending.” J. Compos. Mater. 44 (19): 2249–2263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998310369577.
Torre, L., and J. M. Kenny. 2000. “Impact testing and simulation of composite sandwich structures for civil transportation.” Compos. Struct. 50 (3): 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00101-X.
Triantafillou, T. C., and L. J. Gibson. 1987. “Failure mode maps for foam-core sandwich beams.” Mater. Sci. Eng. 95: 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5416(87)90496-4.
Vitale, J. P., G. Francucci, J. Xiong, and A. Stocchi. 2017. “Failure mode maps of natural and synthetic fiber-reinforced composite sandwich panels.” Composites Part A 94: 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.021.
Zhu, D., H. Shi, H. Fang, W. Liu, Y. Qi, and Y. Bai. 2018. “Fiber-reinforced composites sandwich panels with web-reinforced wood core for building floor applications.” Composites Part B 150: 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.05.048.
Zhu, S., and G. B. Chai. 2013. “Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low-velocity impact.” Compos. Struct. 101: 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.010.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26Issue 2June 2020

History

Received: Aug 29, 2019
Accepted: Dec 9, 2019
Published online: Apr 7, 2020
Published in print: Jun 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 7, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ., 5268 DaCosta Row, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8194-1416. Email: [email protected]
Assistant Professor and Canada Research Chair in Sustainable Infrastructure, Dept. of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie Univ., 5268 DaCosta Row, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-7041. Email: [email protected]
Amir Fam, F.ASCE [email protected]
Donald and Sarah Munro Chair Professor in Engineering and Applied Science and Associate Dean (Research and Graduate Studies), Dept. of Civil Engineering, Queen’s Univ., Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share