Abstract

Current studies and performance labels focus mainly on the operational energy demand of buildings due to heating, cooling, ventilation, lighting, and hot water, but they rarely account for embodied impacts. Performing a life cycle assessment (LCA) on an entire building structure, let alone a building, requires time and data, both of which are often lacking for practitioners in the construction industry. Limited knowledge on the embodied carbon equivalent of building structures led to the benchmarking effort of the database of embodied quantity outputs (DEQO), developed by the first author over the last 6 years in close collaboration with industry and academia. DEQO collects material quantities for existing buildings in a robust way directly from industry. This paper presents the lessons learned from this database to define the next steps for structural engineers to lower the environmental impacts related to the material quantities in their projects. To create confidence and comparability in the results, recommendations are given such as implementing uncertainty analysis into practice to avoid inaccurate comparisons with a false sense of precision.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the engineering companies which provided data to the DEQO database as well as the Structural Engineers 2050 Commitment team, especially Frances Yang, Duncan Cox, Evdokia Angeli, and Amy Hattan. The authors are grateful to Kathrina Simonen and the Carbon Leadership Forum. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 665667 and from the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship.

References

Afsari, K., and C. M. Eastman. 2016. “A comparison of construction classification systems used for classifying building product models.” In Proc., 52nd ASC Annual Int. Conf., Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 90.1. 2019. Energy standard for building except low-rise residential buildings. https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/standard-90-1.
Athena Institute. 2018. About environmental building declarations—An Athena institute briefing note. Ontario, Canada: Athena Institute.
BNB. 2019. “Bewertungssystem Nachhaltiges Bauen für Bundesgebäude.” Accessed November 7, 2019. https://www.bnb-nachhaltigesbauen.de/bewertungssystem.html.
BREEAM. 2019. “Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.breeam.com.
Cabeza, L. F., L. Rincón, V. Vilariño, G. Pérez, and A. Castell. 2014. “Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review.” Renewable Sustainable Energ. Rev. 29: 394–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037.
C-Change Labs. 2020. “Embodied carbon in construction calculator.” Accessed March 20, 2020. http://www.c-change-labs.com/en/.
CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2010. Sustainability of construction works—sustainability assessment of buildings—general framework. EN:15643-1. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
Chevalier, J. L., and J. F. Le Téno. 1996. “Requirements for an LCA-based model for the evaluation of the environmental quality of building products.” Build. Environ. 31 (5): 487–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1323(96)00016-9.
CLF (Carbon Leadership Forum). 2017. “Structural engineers 2050 commitment initiative.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.carbonleadershipforum.org/2017/02/09/structural-engineers-2050-commitment-initiative/.
CSI (Construction Specifications Institute). 2019. “OmniClass™ construction classification system.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.csiresources.org/standards/omniclass.
De Wolf, C., and J. Ochsendorf. 2014. “Participating in an Embodied Carbon Database. Connecting structural material quantities with environmental impact.” Struct. Eng. 92 (2): 30–31.
De Wolf, C., M. Ramage, and J. Ochsendorf. 2016. “Low carbon vaulted masonry structures.” J. Int. Assoc. Shell Spatal Struct. 57 (4): 275–284. https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2016.190.854.
De Wolf, C., F. Yang, D. Cox, A. Charlson, A. Hattan, and J. Ochsendorf. 2015. “Material quantities and embodied carbon dioxide in structures.” ICE Eng. Sustainable 169 (ES4): 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1680/ensu.15.00033.
DGNB. 2019. “The DGNB certification system. Uniquely flexible.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.dgnb-system.de/en/system/certification_system/.
Dodd, N., S. Donatello, M. Gama-Caldas, I. Vand de Vyver, W. Debacker, M. Stranger, C. Spirinckx, O. Dugrosprez, and K. Allacker. 2016. Identifying indicators for the life cycle environmental performance, quality and value of EU office and residential buildings. Working Paper 2, Joint Research Centre (JRC) Technical Reports. Sevilla, Spain: European Commission.
EcoInvent. 2019. “Swiss centre for life cycle inventories.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.ecoinvent.ch.
EeBGuide. 2019. “EeBGuide project.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.eebguide.eu.
EN-15804. 2012. Sustainability of construction works. Environmental product declarations. Core rules for the product category of construction products. European committee for standardization.
EN-15978. 2011. Sustainability of construction works. Assessment of environmental performance of buildings. Calculation method. European committee for standardization.
Goedkoop, M., and M. Oele. 2008. Simapro database manual: Methods library. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: Pre Consultants.
Guinée, J. 2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Guinée, J. B., et al. 2002. Life cycle assessment: An operational guide to the ISO standards. Technical Report. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Häkkinnen, T., et al. 2012. Sustainability and performance assessment and benchmarking of a building. Espoo: VTT Technology.
Hauschild, M. Z., M. Goedkoop, J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, O. Jolliet, M. Margni, and A. De Schryver. 2010. “Framework and requirements for Life Cycle Impact Assessment models and indicators.” In: ILCD handbook: Framework and requirements for life cycle impact assessment models and indicators. Ispra, Italy: Joint Research Centre of the European Commission and Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Heeren, N., and T. Fishman. 2019. “A database seed for a community-driven material intensity research platform.” Sci. Data 6 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0021-x.
Heeren, N., C. L. Mutel, B. Steubing, Y. Ostermeyer, H. Wallbaum, and S. Hellweg. 2015. “Environmental impact of buildings—what matters?” Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (16): 9832–9841. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est5b01735.
Hollberg, A., T. Lützkendorf, and G. Habert. 2019. “Top-down or bottom-up?—How environmental benchmarks can support the design process.” Build Environ. 153: 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.026.
Howard, N., and D. Sharp. 2010. Methodology guidelines for the materials and buildings products life cycle inventory database. Sydney, Australia: Building Products Innovation Council (BPIC).
Hoxha, E. 2015. “Amélioration de la fiabilité des évaluations environnementales des bâtiments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Mécanique des matériaux [physics.class-ph], Université Paris Est.
Hoxha, E., G. Habert, J. Chevalier, M. Bazzana, and R. Le Roy. 2014. “Method to analyse the contribution of material’s sensitivity in buildings’ environmental impact.” J. Cleaner Prod. 66 (1): 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.056.
HQE (Haute Qualité Environnementale). 2012. Construisons ensemble HQE performance. Paris, France: HQE.
Huijbregts, M. A. J., W. Gilijamse, A. M. J. Ragas, and L. Reijnders. 2003. “Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 (11): 2600–2608. https://doi.org/10.1021/es020971.
ICE (Institution of Civil Engineers). 2013. Civil engineering standard method of measurement. 4th ed. London: ICE.
IPCC (International Panel for Climate Change). 2013. IPCC fifth assessment report. The physical science basis. http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/.
IPCC (International Panel for Climate Change). 2014. Climate change 2014 synthesis report. summary for policy makers. Valencia, Spain: IPCC.
ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2019. Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works—methodological principles for the development of benchmarks for sustainable buildings. ISO/FDIS 21678. La Plaine Saint-Denis, France: ISO.
ISO 14040. 2006. “Environmental management–Life cycle assessment–principles and framework.” Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
Jolliet, O., M. Margni, R. Charles, S. Humbert, J. Payet, G. Rebitzer, and R. Rosenbaum. 2003. “IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8 (6): 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505.
Kaethner, S., and J. Burridge. 2012. “Embodied CO2 of structural frames.” Struct. Eng. 90 (5): 33–40.
Kasser, U. 1998. “Gebäude Gesamtenergetisch Beurteilt.” SchweizerIngenieur Und Architekt 116 (13): 6.
Kneifel, J., P. Lavappa, A. Landfield Greig, and S. Suh. 2015. Building industry reporting and design for sustainability (BIRDS) New residential database technical manual. NIST Technical Note 1878. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NIST.
König, H., and M. L. De Cristofaro. 2012. “Benchmarks for life cycle costs and life cycle assessment of residential buildings.” Build. Res. Inf. 40 (5): 558–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2012.702017.
Lasvaux, S., A. Lebert, F. Achim, F. Grannec, E. Hoxha, S. Nibel, N. Schiopu, and J. Chevalier. 2017. “Towards guidance values for the environmental performance of buildings: Application to the statistical analysis of 40 low-energy single family houses’ LCA in France.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22 (5): 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1253-z.
Lavagna, M., C. Baldassarri, A. Campioli, S. Giorgi, A. D. Valle, V. Castellani, and S. Sala. 2018. “Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock.” Build. Environ. 145: 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008.
Lloyd, S. M., and R. Ries. 2007. “Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment: A survey of quantitative approaches.” J. Ind. Ecol. 11 (1): 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.2007.1136.
Luscuere, L., R. Zanatta, D. Mulhall, J. Boström, and L. Elfström. 2019. Deliverable 7 operational materials passports. Buildings as Materials Banks (BAMB), EPEA Nederland BV. Brussels, Belgium: SundaHus I Linköping AB.
Lützkendorf, T., N. Kohler, and H. König. 2012a. “Integrated life cycle assessment: Benchmarks and uncertainty.” In Proc., Int. Symp. of Life Cycle Assessment Construction—Civil Engineering and Building, Nantes, France, edited by A. von Ventura, and C. de la Roche, 28–36. Bagneux: RILEM.
Lützkendorf, T., N. Kohler, H. König, and M. Balouktsi. 2012b. “Building sustainability assessment—from calculation to valuation.” In BSA 2012-Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Building Sustainability Assessment. Porto: Green Lines Institute for Sustainable Development.
Madaster. 2019. “Waste is a material without an identity.” Accessed November 7, 2019. https://www.madaster.com/en/newsroom/blog/How-to-interpret-the-statement-Waste-is-material-without-an-identity.
Mathew, P. A., L. N. Dunn, M. D. Sohn, A. Mercado, C. Custodio, and T. Walter. 2015. “Big-data for building energy performance: Lessons from assembling.” Appl. Energy 140: 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.042.
Mendoza Beltran, M. A., F. Pomponi, J. B. Guinée, and R. Heijungs. 2018. “Uncertainty analysis in embodied carbon assessments: What are the implications of Its omission?” In: Embodied carbon in buildings: Measurement, management and mitigation, edited by F. Pomponi, C. De Wolf, and A. M. Moncaster. 3–22. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Miller, R., J. Gregory, and R. Kirchain. 2017. Critical issues when comparing whole building & building product environmental performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub.
Minergie-ECO. 2018. “Le complement ECO.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.minergie.ch/fr/certifier/eco/.
Mokhari, A., and H. C. Frey. 2005. Review and recommendation of methods for sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for the stochastic human exposure and dose simulation (SHEDS) models. volume: Review of available methods for conducting sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in probabilistic models. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
NIST. 2019. “BEES software, last updated 2010.” Accessed November 7, 2019. https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/bees.
OpenLCA. 2019. “OpenLCA. The life cycle of things.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.openlca.org.
Peuportier, B. L. P. 2001. “Life cycle assessment applied to the comparative evaluation of single family houses in the French context.” Energy Build. 33 (5): 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00101-8.
Pomponi, F., B. D’Amico, and A. Moncaster. 2017. “A method to facilitate uncertainty analysis in LCAs of buildings.” Energies 10 (4): 524–538. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10040524.
Rashid, A. F. A., and S. Yusoff. 2015. “A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 45: 244–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.043.
Resch, E., and I. Andresen. 2018. “A database tool for systematic analysis of embodied emissions in buildings and neighborhoods.” Buildings 8 (8): 106–121. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8080106.
RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors). 2017. “Whole life carbon assessment for the built environment.” UK: RICS professional standards and guidance.
RICS (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors). 2020. “RICS building carbon database.” https://wlcarbon.rics.org/Default.aspx.
Ross, S., D. Evans, and M. Webber. 2002. “How LCA studies deal with uncertainty.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 7 (1): 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978909.
Sarkisian, M., D. Shook, and J. Zhang. 2014. “Developing a basis for design—embodied carbon in structures.” In Proc., Sustainable Structures Symp., 147–162., Portland, OR: Portland State Univ., School of Architecture.
SE 2050. 2019. “Structural Engineers 2050 Commitment Initiative. Leading to Zero Carbon Structures.” Carbon Leadership Forum. Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.carbonleadershipforum.org/2017/02/09/structural-engineers-2050-commitment-initiative/.
SE 2050. 2020. “Committing to zero.” Structural Engineers Institute (SEI), ASCE. https://se2050.org.
SIA. 2004. SIA D 0200 SNARC—SystematikZurBeurteilung Der Nachhaltigkeit von ArchitekturprojektenFür Den Bereich Umwelt.
SIA 2040. 2019. “La voie SIA vers l’efficacité énergétique.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.sia.ch/fr/themes/energie/efficacite-energetique/.
SimaPro. 2019. “SimaPro UK Ltd. The world’s most widely used LCA software.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.simapro.co.uk.
Simonen, K., B. X. Rodriguez, S. Barrera, and M. Huang. 2017a. “CLF embodied carbon benchmark database.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/38017.
Simonen, K., B. X. Rodriguez, and C. De Wolf. 2017b. “Benchmarking the embodied carbon of buildings.” Technol. Archit. Des. 1 (2): 208–218.
Simonen, K., B. X. Rodriguez, and S. Li. 2017c. “CLF embodied carbon benchmark data visualization.” Carbon Leadership Forum. Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.carbonleadershipforum.org/data-visualization/.
Simonen, K., B. X. Rodriguez, E. McDade, and L. Strain. 2017d. “Embodied carbon benchmark study: LCA for low carbon construction.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/38017.
SOM. 2019. “Environmental analysis tool.” Accessed November 7, 2019. https://somhpd.com/eatool/.
Tomasetti, T. 2019. “Embodied carbon and energy efficiency tool.” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://core.thorntontomasetti.com/embodied-carbon-efficiency-tool/.
Tukey, J.W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesely.
USGBC (U.S. Green Building Council). 2013. LEED v4 for building design and construction. Washington, DC: USGBC.
Vieira, P. S., and A. Horvath. 2008. “Assessing the end-of-life impacts of buildings.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 42 (13): 4663–4669. https://doi.org/10.1021/es071345l.
Weidema, B. P., and M. S. Wesnæs. 1996. “Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators.” J. Cleaner Prod. 4 (3–4): 167–174.
WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme). 2018. “Embodied carbon database (ECDB).” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://ecdb.wrap.org.uk.
Wüthrich, S. 2019. “Standard de Construction Durable Suisse (SNBS).” Accessed November 7, 2019. http://www.nnbs.ch/documents/864304/891643/Stephan_Wuethrich_F_NNBS_20130613.pdf.
Wyss, F., R. Frischknecht, K. Pfäffli, and V. John. 2014. Zielwert Gesamtumweltbelastung Gebäude – Machbarkeitsstudie. Stadt Zürich: Bundesamt für Energie, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Confédération suisse.
Yang, F. 2014. “Benchmarking embodied impact performance of structure.” In Proc., Sustainable Structures Symp., April 17–18, 131–146. Portland OR: Portland State University.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 26Issue 3September 2020

History

Received: Mar 6, 2019
Accepted: Dec 2, 2019
Published online: Apr 17, 2020
Published in print: Sep 1, 2020
Discussion open until: Sep 17, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Structural Xploration Lab (SXL), Smart Living Lab, Passage du Cardinal 13B, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland (corresponding author). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3017-4963. Email: [email protected]
Endrit Hoxha [email protected]
Institute of Technology and Testing of Construction Materials, Graz Univ. of Technology, 8010, Inffeldgasse 24 Graz, Austria. Email: [email protected]
Dept. of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Division of Building Technology, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Sven Hultins gata 6, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9756-2362. Email: [email protected]
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Structural Xploration Lab (SXL), Smart Living Lab, Passage du Cardinal 13B, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-9835. Email: [email protected]
John Ochsendorf [email protected]
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 02139 Cambridge, MA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share