Technical Papers
Sep 23, 2019

Development of an Integrated Quality Function Deployment and Utility Theory Weighting System to Improve Occupants' Satisfaction

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 25, Issue 4

Abstract

Studies have shown that occupant satisfaction is a compelling factor affecting building energy consumption. Occupants' behavior has a direct relationship to their satisfaction, and it is clear that occupants' satisfaction is highly impacted by the indoor environmental quality. To identify the best design, parameters influencing occupants' perception as well as other competing objectives should be contemplated. In recent years, various multiobjective optimization algorithms have been developed to determine the best design strategies. However, occupants' satisfaction and the effect of different strategies on it comprise the missing component of these studies. Therefore, this study aims to identify the parameters influencing occupant satisfaction and develop a weighting system that can reflect these requirements in addition to the constructors' perception. To attain this objective, a survey study was conducted to identify the parameters affecting end users' satisfaction. To evaluate the construction experts' perspective regarding the identified parameters, an experts' utility function was calculated for the determined parameters. Furthermore, using the single-attribute utility and multiattribute utility, a weighting system was developed and assigned to each satisfactory requirement.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Qatar National Research Foundation (QNRF)/National Priorities Research Program (NPRP). The authors would like to acknowledge their support for this study.

References

Arditi, D., and D. E. Lee. 2003. “Assessing the corporate service quality performance of design-build contractors using quality function deployment.” Constr. Manage. Econ. 21 (2): 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000079716.
Azam Haron, N., H. Abdul-Rahman, C. Wang, and L. C. Wood. 2015. “Quality function deployment modelling to enhance industrialised building system adoption in housing projects.” Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excell. 26 (7–8): 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.880626.
Azar, E., and C. C. Menassa. 2012. “A comprehensive analysis of the impact of occupancy parameters in energy simulation of office buildings.” Energy Build. 55: 841–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.10.002.
Bakker, L. G., E. C. M. Hoes-van Oeffelen, R. C. G. M. Loonen, and J. L. M. Hensen. 2014. “User satisfaction and interaction with automated dynamic facades: A pilot study.” Build. Environ. 78: 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.007.
Bates, J., J. Polak, P. Jones, and A. Cook. 2001. “The valuation of reliability for personal travel.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 37 (2–3): 191–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-5545(00)00011-9.
Beck, M. J., S. Hess, M. O. Cabral, and I. Dubernet. 2017. “Valuing travel time savings: A case of short-term or long term choices?” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 100: 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.02.001.
Bernoulli, D. 1954. “Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk.” Econ.: J. Econ. Soc. 22 (1): 23–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909829.
Brauers, W. K., and E. K. Zavadskas. 2006. “The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy.” Control Cybern. 35: 445–469.
Choi, J., A. Aziz, and V. Loftness. 2010. “Investigation on the impacts of different genders and ages on satisfaction with thermal environments in office buildings.” Build. Environ. 45 (6): 1529–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.01.004.
Chokor, A., M. El Asmar, C. Tilton, and I. Srour. 2016. “Dual assessment framework to evaluate LEED-certified facilities' occupant satisfaction and energy performance: Macro and micro approaches.” J. Archit. Eng. 22 (4): A4015003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000186.
Chung, T. M., and R. T. H. Ng. 2016. “The application of analytic hierarchy process in daylighting performance assessment.” Indoor Built Environ. 25 (1): 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X14525061.
Cockerill, K. 2014. “The water supply is fine: Decision-maker perceptions of water quantity and supply-side management.” Water Environ. J. 28 (2): 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12029.
Cohen, L. 1995. Quality function deployment: How to make QFD work for you. Reading, MA: Prentice Hall.
De Moraes Ramos, G., W. Daamen, and S. Hoogendoorn. 2011. “Expected utility theory, prospect theory, and regret theory compared for prediction of route choice behavior.” Transp. Res. Rec. 2230 (1): 19–28. https://doi.org/10.3141/2230-03.
Dikmen, I., M. T. Talat Birgonul, and S. Kiziltas. 2005. “Strategic use of quality function deployment (QFD) in the construction industry.” Build. Environ. 40 (2): 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.07.001.
Fesanghary, M., S. Asadi, and Z. W. Geem. 2012. “Design of low-emission and energy-efficient residential buildings using a multi-objective optimization algorithm.” Build. Environ. 49: 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.030.
Firrantello, J. T., P. Aumpansub, W. P. Bahnfleth, B. Hu, J. D. Freihaut, B. Thran, and S. Hutchens. 2007. “Effects of HVAC system and building characteristics on exposure of occupants to short-duration point source aerosol releases.” J. Archit. Eng. 13 (2): 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:2(84.
Frontczak, M., and P. Wargocki. 2011. “Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments.” Build. Environ. 46 (4): 922–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.10.021.
Giusti, L., and M. Almoosawi. 2017. “Impact of building characteristics and occupants' behaviour on the electricity consumption of households in Abu Dhabi (UAE).” Energy Build. 151: 534–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.07.019.
Hancock, P. A., J. M. Ross, and J. L. Szalma. 2007. “A meta-analysis of performance response under thermal stressors.” Hum. Factors 49 (5): 851–877. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X230226.
Henn, V., and M. Ottomanelli. 2006. “Handling uncertainty in route choice models: From probabilistic to possibilistic approaches.” Eur. J. Oper. Res. 175 (3): 1526–1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.026.
Kaplinski, O. 2013. “Risk management of construction works by means of the utility theory: A case study.” Procedia Eng. 57: 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.068.
Karlsen, L., P. Heiselberg, and I. Bryn. 2015. “Occupant satisfaction with two blind control strategies: Slats closed and slats in cut-off position.” Solar Energy 115: 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.02.031.
López, M. E., C. P. Kaplan, A. M. Nápoles, E. S. Hwang, J. C. Livaudais, and L. S. Karliner. 2014. “Satisfaction with treatment decision-making and treatment regret among Latinas and non-Latina whites with DCIS.” Patient Educ. Couns. 94 (1): 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.005.
Majumdar, R., A. K. Shrivastava, P. K. Kapur, and S. K. Khatri. 2017. “Release and testing stop time of a software using multi-attribute utility theory.” Life Cycle Reliab. Saf. Eng. 6 (1): 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-017-0005-9.
Mirrahimi, S., M. F. Mohamed, L. C. Haw, N. L. N. Ibrahim, W. F. M. Yusoff, and A. Aflaki. 2016. “The effect of building envelope on the thermal comfort and energy saving for high-rise buildings in hot–humid climate.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 53: 1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.055.
Mostavi, E., S. Asadi, and D. Boussaa. 2017. “Development of a new methodology to optimize building life cycle cost, environmental impacts, and occupant satisfaction.” Energy 121: 606–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.049.
Mostavi, E., S. Asadi, and I. J. Ramaji. 2016. “Completing the missing puzzle piece of the building design process: Modeling and identifying occupants' satisfaction level in commercial buildings.” In Proc., Construction research congress 2016: Old and new construction technologies converge in historic San Juan, edited by J. L. Perdomo-Rivera, A. Gonzáles-Quevedo, C. López del Puerto, F. Maldonado-Fortunet, and O. I. Molina-Bas, 1112–1121. Reston, VA: ASCE.
Nahmens, I., A. Joukar, and R. Cantrell. 2015. “Impact of low-income occupant behavior on energy consumption in hot-humid climates.” J. Archit. Eng. 21 (2): B4014006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000162.
Osborne, M. J. 2004. An introduction to game theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Petri, I., H. Li, Y. Rezgui, Y. Chunfeng, B. Yuce, and B. Jayan. 2014. “A modular optimisation model for reducing energy consumption in large scale building facilities.” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 38: 990–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.044.
Ramos, G. M., W. Daamen, and S. Hoogendoorn. 2014. “A state-of-the-art review: Developments in utility theory, prospect theory and regret theory to investigate travellers' behaviour in situations involving travel time uncertainty.” Transp. Rev. 34 (1): 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.856356.
Thurston, D. L., and A. Locascio. 1994. “Decision theory for design economics.” Eng. Econ. 40 (1): 41–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00137919408903138.
Varjo, J., V. Hongisto, A. Haapakangas, H. Maula, H. Koskela, and J. Hyönä. 2015. “Simultaneous effects of irrelevant speech, temperature and ventilation rate on performance and satisfaction in open-plan offices.” J. Environ. Psychol. 44: 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.08.001.
Von Neumann, J., and O. Morgenstern. 2007. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wang, W., R. Zmeureanu, and H. Rivard. 2005. “Applying multi-objective genetic algorithms in green building design optimization.” Build. Environ. 40 (11): 1512–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.11.017.
Zavadskas, E. K., Z. Turskis, J. Antucheviciene, and A. Zakarevicius. 2012. “Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment.” Elektron. elektrotech. 122 (6): 3–6. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 25Issue 4December 2019

History

Received: Jan 26, 2017
Accepted: Mar 6, 2019
Published online: Sep 23, 2019
Published in print: Dec 1, 2019
Discussion open until: Feb 23, 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Ehsan Mostavi [email protected]
Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., 104 Engineering Unit A, University Park, PA 16802. Email: [email protected]
Somayeh Asadi, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., 104 Engineering, Unit A, University Park, PA 16802 (corresponding author). Email: [email protected]
Djamel Boussaa
Dept. of Architecture and Urban Planning, Qatar Univ., PO Box 2713, Doha, Qatar.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share