Lateral Load Path Analysis: Practical Methods for Light-Frame Modular Structures
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 24, Issue 4
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to use SAP 2000 v16 to investigate lateral load paths and system behaviors in a modular, light-frame wood structure by investigating different foundation configurations and to further develop and validate existing modeling techniques for shear walls according to the perforated shear wall method. The modeling methods were validated using full-scale tests conducted by previous researchers on subassemblies and rectangular and L-shaped houses. A main lateral force–resisting system and components and cladding wind loads were applied in perpendicular directions to the exterior walls. Analysis was performed for a series of foundation types to examine the effects on overall and local behaviors. The effectiveness of the different foundation schemes was evaluated. The racking shear stiffness calibration procedures implemented previously for light-framed construction were found to be applicable to modular, light-frame, shear walls also. In addition, anchorage elongation was found to substantially affect the racking shear stiffness of shear walls with aspect ratios within limits similar to those provided by the specific design provisions for wind and seismic design. For regularly shaped modular structures, assumptions that tributary areas of resisting elements for lateral loads were found to produce conservative demands when contributions from the uplift pressures of wind loads were ignored. Thousands of structures such as these have been used throughout the United States in various applications. Because wind loads have been a major contributor to the annual structural damage of light-framed wood structures and methods to evaluate load paths sufficiently are needed, this study is an important development in the design of modular buildings and the subsequent acceptance of them by building code officials.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
APA (APA–The Engineered Wood Association). 2012. Panel design specification. Form No. D510C. Tacoma, WA: APA.
ASCE. 2011. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reston, VA: ASCE.
ASTM. 2006. ASTM E 564-06 standard practice for static load test for shear resistance of framed walls for buildings. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
AWC (American Wood Council). 2015a. National design specification (NDS) for wood construction. ANSI/AWC NDS-2015. Leesburg, VA: AWC.
AWC (American Wood Council). 2015b. Special design provisions for wind and seismic (SDPWS). ANSI/AWC SPDWS-2015. Leesburg, VA: AWC.
GA (Gypsum Association). 2010. Gypsum board typical mechanical and physical properties. GA-235-10. Hyattsville, MD: GA.
Huynh, T. Q. 2016. “Lateral load path analysis: Practical methods for light-frame modular structures.” M.S. thesis, Dept. of Wood Science and Engineering, Oregon State Univ.
ICC (International Code Council). 2011. 2012 International building code (IBC). Country Club Hills, IL: ICC.
Kasal, B. 1992. “A nonlinear three-dimensional finite-element model of a light-frame wood structure.” Ph.D. dissertation, Oregon State Univ.
Martin, K. G., R. Gupta, D. O. Prevatt, P. L. Datin, and J. W. van de Lindt. 2011. “Modeling system effects and structural load paths in a wood-framed structure.” J. Archit. Eng. 17 (4): 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000045.
MBI (Modular Building Institute). 2015. Permanent modular construction 2014 annual report. Charlottesville, VA: MBI.
MBS (Modern Building Systems, Inc.). 2015. Design master plan 28′ × 64′ classroom (base). Aumsville, OR: MBS.
McGraw-Hill Construction. 2011. Prefabrication and modularization: Increasing productivity in the construction industry. SmartMarket Rep. Bedform, MA: McGraw-Hill Construction.
Pfretzschner, K. S., R. Gupta, and T. H. Miller. 2014. “Practical modeling for load paths in a realistic light-frame wood house.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 28 (3): 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000448.
Wear, B. 2007. Modified ASTM D3953, section 13.3: Ultimate load tests in tension of 0.035-in. × 1.25-in. galvanized steel straps with 0.035-in. × 1.25-in. galvanized steel snap-on seals. Nappanee, IN: NTA Testing Laboratories.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 3, 2017
Accepted: Apr 11, 2018
Published online: Sep 14, 2018
Published in print: Dec 1, 2018
Discussion open until: Feb 14, 2019
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.