Discrepancies between Female Student Perception and Reality of the Engineering Industry
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 3
Abstract
Demographic trends predict a shortage of engineers, with women being one group targeted to fill this gap. Although the percentage of engineering degrees attained by women has increased, there has not been an equal increase in the number of women working in the industry. This means that women are either leaving the industry after they enter or not entering at all. The purpose of this study was to identify what can be done in the education of female engineering students to better prepare them for the engineering workforce reality and culture. A survey was conducted to collect information from female architectural engineering students about their perception of the industry. The results were then compared to the actual conditions of the workforce. The goal was to identify areas of discrepancy between perception and reality so that these areas can be addressed before students enter the workforce. The hope is that, with a better understanding of their career environment, women will be better prepared to deal with the issues that may cause them to leave the industry.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2012). “The engineering income and salary survey.” 〈https://www.asme.org/getmedia/788e990f-99f5-4062-801c-d2ef0586b52d/32673_Engineering_Income_Salary_Survey.aspx〉 (June 10, 2015).
Ayre, M., Mills, J., and Gill, J. (2013). “‘Yes, I do belong’: The women who stay in engineering.” Eng. Stud., 5(3), 216–232.
Duffield, J., Cooper, M., and Roger, A. (1997). Women into science, engineering and technology in higher education (Part 1–Access guide), Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, Edinburgh, U.K.
Fouad, N. A., Singh, R., Fitzpatrick, M. E., and Liu, J. P. (2012). “Stemming the tide: Why women leave engineering.” National Science Foundation Grant # 0827553 Rep., Univ. of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Frehill, L. (2010). “Satisfaction.” Mech. Eng., 132(1), 38–41.
Keen, J. (2010). “Retention of women architectural engineers in industry.” Doctoral dissertation, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (Order No. 3408129.)
NSF (National Science Foundation). (2014). “Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering.” Data files 〈http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/2013/tables.cfm〉 (June 10, 2015).
Powell, A., Bagilhole, B., and Dainty, A. (2006). “The problem of women’s assimilation into UK engineering cultures: Can critical mass work?” Equal Opportunities Int., 25(8), 688–699.
Servon, L., and Visser, M. (2011). :Progress hindered: The retention and advancement of women in science, engineering and technology careers.” Hum. Resour. Manage. J., 12(3), 272–284.
SWE (Society of Women Engineers). (2007). “Where are all the women going? Engineering and science struggling to retain women in academia and industry.” Press release 〈http://societyofwomenengineers.swe.org/images/PDFs/07releases/swe_oct18congressbrief.pdf〉 (June 10, 2015).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22 • Issue 3 • September 2016
Copyright
© 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Oct 6, 2015
Accepted: Apr 20, 2016
Published online: May 17, 2016
Published in print: Sep 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Oct 17, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.