Technical Paper
Dec 2, 2015

Assessing the Lifecycle Sustainability Costs and Benefits of Seismic Mitigation Designs for Buildings

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 1

Abstract

A complete sustainable-performance analysis that takes into consideration the whole of the triple bottom line of sustainability is necessary when one needs to balance social, economic, and environmental impacts in an optimal cost-effective design based fundamentally on sustainability performance objectives. This study introduces a methodology that can translate seismic building damage into clearly quantifiable social, economic, and environmental impacts, which can be used when selecting repair methods appropriate for various states of building damage and for the local economic and environmental situation. The authors also propose a lifecycle-assessment framework with which one can evaluate the costs and benefits associated with a seismic design over the lifecycle of a building. Two case studies are presented. The first case assesses the sustainability performance of a single RC building under seismic risk. The second case, taking into account the uncertainty associated with seismic events, comprises a risk-based cost-benefit analysis of the desirability, in terms of the three sustainability metrics (separately and in combination), of two seismic retrofit designs on a regional scale. A comparison of the relative merits of the two proposed retrofit designs revealed that preventing buildings from becoming irreparably damaged plays an important role in increasing the cost-efficiency of a retrofit design. These findings also indicate that, although neither design can be considered feasible with respect to the three sustainability metrics individually, the lower-cost/lower-resistance design is justifiable if measured by the combined benefit from all three metrics, expressed in monetary terms. This finding emphasizes the necessity of a complete sustainable-performance analysis for achieving a cost-effective design. Finally, when comparing all three metrics in monetary terms, the savings associated with the reduction in fatalities contribute the most to the total expected benefit of a retrofit project, followed by reduced repair costs and reduced CO2 emissions.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this research by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the State of Israel (MSTSI) under Grant Number 3-9618. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the MSTSI.

References

Althaus, H. J., et al. (2007). EcoInvent data overview and methodology, R. Frischknecht and N. Jungbluth, eds., Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
Årskog, V., Fossdal, S., and Gjørv, O. E. (2004). “Life-cycle assessment of repair and maintenance systems for concrete structures.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 193–200.
ASCE. (2007). “Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings.” ASCE/SEI 41-06, Reston, VA.
ATC (Applied Technology Council). (1985). “Earthquake damage evaluation data for California.” ATC-13, Redwood City, CA.
Aydin, E., and Boduroglu, M. (2008). “Optimal placement of steel diagonal braces for upgrading the seismic capacity of existing structures and its comparison with optimal dampers.” J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(1), 72–86.
Ayyub, B. M. (2003). Risk analysis in engineering and economics. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Bird, J. F., and Bommer, J. J. (2004). “Earthquake losses due to ground failure.” Eng. Geol., 75(2), 147–179.
CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) (2015). “2014 price indices of residential buildings.” Jerusalem, Israel. 〈http://147.237.248.50/reader/?MIval=cw_usr_view_SHTML&ID=491〉 (Mar. 15, 2015).
CDP. (2013). “Use of internal carbon price by companies as incentive and strategic planning tool.” New York, NY.
Chang, Y., Cheng, Y., Lin, S., and Sheu, M. (2002). “A simplified evaluation method for the CO2 emission of buildings in Taiwan.” J. Archit., 41, 1–21.
Chiu, C., Chen, M., and Chiu, C. (2013). “Financial and environmental payback periods of seismic retrofit investments for reinforced concrete buildings estimated using a novel method.” J. Archit. Eng., 112–118.
Ciroth, A., Hunkeler, D. J., and Lichtenvort, K. (2008). Environmental life cycle costing, SETAC, Pensacola, FL.
Comber, M., and Poland, C. (2013). “Disaster resilience and sustainable design: Quantifying the benefits of a holistic design approach.” Proc., Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 2717–2728.
Diven, R., and Shaurette, M. (2010). Demolition: Practices, Technology, and Management, Purdue University Press, West Lafayette, IN.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., and Saydam, D. (2013). “Time‐variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10), 1451–1467.
EIA (Energy Information Administration). (2010). “Energy calculators.” Washington, DC.
EPA. (2008). “NONROAD model (nonroad engines, equipment, and vehicles).” Washington, DC.
EPA. (2014). “Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990–2012.” Washington, DC.
Erdik, M., Şeşetyan, K., Demircioğlu, M., Hancılar, U., and Zülfikar, C. (2011). “Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 31(2), 247–266.
Feese, C., Li, Y., and Bulleit, W. M. (2014). “Assessment of seismic damage of buildings and related environmental impacts.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil, 04014106.
FEMA. (1992). “A benefit-cost model for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (1994). “Seismic rehabilitation of federal buildings: A benefit cost model.” Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2000). “Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings.” Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2006a). “Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines.” Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2006b). “Techniques for the seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings.” Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2008). “HAZUS-MH estimated annualized earthquake losses for the United States.” Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2012). Seismic performance assessment of buildings, Washington, DC.
FEMA. (2013). Earthquake model HAZUS, MH technical manual, Washington, DC.
Fragiadakis, M., Lagaros, N. D., and Papadrakakis, M. (2006). “Performance-based multiobjective optimum design of steel structures considering life-cycle cost.” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 32(1), 1–11.
Fragiadakis, M., and Papadrakakis, M. (2008). “Performance‐based optimum seismic design of reinforced concrete structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 37(6), 825–844.
Ghobarah, A. (2001). “Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: State of development.” Eng. Struct., 23(8), 878–884.
Ghosh, J., and Padgett, J. E. (2011). “Probabilistic seismic loss assessment of aging bridges using a component‐level cost estimation approach.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(15), 1743–1761.
Gillenwater, M. (2014). “Primer on the new U.S. regulation on GHG emissions for carbon professionals.” 〈http://ghginstitute.org/primer-on-the-new-u-s-regulation-on-ghg-emissions-for-carbon-professionals/〉 (June 9, 2014).
Grossi, P., Kunreuther, H., and Patel, C. C. (2005). “An introduction to catastrophe models and insurance.” Catastrophe modeling: A new approach to managing risk, Springer, New York, 23–42.
Hamburger, R., Rojahn, C., Heintz, J., and Mahoney, M. (2012). “FEMA P58: Next-generation building seismic performance assessment methodology.” Proc., 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, International Association for Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan.
Hossain, K. A., and Gencturk, B. (2014). “Life-cycle environmental impact assessment of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to natural hazards.” J. Archit. Eng., A4014001.
Huberman, N., and Pearlmutter, D. (2008). “A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert.” Energy Build., 40(5), 837–848.
ISO. (2006). “Environmental management: Life cycle assessment principles and framework.” ISO 14040, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jaiswal, K., and Wald, D. (2010). “An empirical model for global earthquake fatality estimation.” Earthquake Spectra, 26(4), 1017–1037.
Júlio, E Branco, F., and Silva, (2003). “Structural rehabilitation of columns with reinforced concrete jacketing.” Prog. Struct. Mater. Eng., 5(1), 29–37.
Kircher, C. A., Seligson, H. A., Bouabid, J., and Morrow, G. C. (2006). “When the big one strikes again: Estimated losses due to a repeat of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), 297–339.
Kircher, C. A., Whitman, R. V., and Holmes, W. T. (2006). “HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods.” Nat. Hazard. Rev., 45–59.
Levi, T, et al. (2010). “Earthquake loss estimation in Israel using the new HAZUS-MH software: Preliminary implementation.” Ministry of National Infrastructures Geological Survey of Israel, Jerusalem, Israel.
Liu, M., Burns, S. A., and Wen, Y. (2005). “Multiobjective optimization for performance‐based seismic design of steel moment frame structures.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(3), 289–306.
Masanet, E., Stadel, A., and Gursel, P. (2012). Life-cycle evaluation of concrete building construction as a strategy for sustainable cities, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
McGuire, R. K. (2001). “Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 21(5), 377–384.
Norio, O., Ye, T., Kajitani, N., Shi, T., and Tatano, H., (2011). “The 2011 eastern Japan great earthquake disaster: Overview and comments.” Int. J. Disaster Risk Sci., 2(1), 34–42.
Padgett, J. E., Dennemann, K., and Ghosh, J. (2010). “Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment.” Struct. Saf., 32(3), 165–173.
Padgett, J. E., and Tapia, C. (2013). “Sustainability of natural hazard risk mitigation: Life cycle analysis of environmental indicators for bridge infrastructure.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 395–408.
Pan, C., Wang, H., Huang, S., and Zhang, H. (2014). “The Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami aftermath: Preliminary assessment of carbon footprint of housing reconstruction.” Tsunami Events and Lessons Learned, Y. Kontar, V. Santiago-Fandino, and T. Takahashi, eds., Springer, New York, 435–450.
Park, H. S., Lee, D. C., Oh, B. K., Choi, S. W., and Kim, Y. (2014). “Performance-based multiobjective optimal seismic retrofit method for a steel moment-resisting frame considering the life-cycle cost.” Math. Prob. Eng., 2014, 305737.
Peterson, J., and Small, M. J. (2012). “Methodology for benefit-cost analysis of seismic codes.” Nat. Hazard., 63(2), 1039–1053.
Ploeger, S., Atkinson, G., and Samson, C. (2010). “Applying the HAZUS-MH software tool to assess seismic risk in downtown Ottawa, Canada.” Nat. Hazard., 53(1), 1–20.
Popescu, C. M., Phaobunjong, K., and Ovararin, N. (2003). Estimating building costs, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Rein, A., and Corotis, R. B. (2013). “An overview approach to seismic awareness for a 'quiescent' region.” Nat. Hazard., 67(2), 335–363.
Remo, J. W., and Pinter, N. (2012). “HAZUS-MH earthquake modeling in the central USA.” Nat. Hazard., 63(2), 1055–1081.
Shapira, S., Aharonson-Daniel, L., Shohet, I. M., Peek-Asa, C., and Bar-Dayan, Y. (2015). “Integrating epidemiological and engineering approaches in the assessment of human casualties in earthquakes.” Nat. Hazards, 78(2), 1447–1462.
Shohet, I. M., et al. (2015). “Analytical-empirical model for the assessment of earthquake casualties and injuries in a typical Israeli city.” Final report, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Ben-Gurion Univ., Beer Sheva, Israel, in preparation.
SI (Standards Institution of Israel). (1995). “Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures.” SI-413, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Spence, R., Bommer, J., del Re, D., Bird, J., Aydinoğlu, N., and Tabuchi, S. (2003). “Comparing loss estimation with observed damage: A study of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey.” Bull. Earthquake Eng., 1(1), 83–113.
Spence, R., and So, E. (2009). “Estimating shaking-induced casualties and building damage for global earthquake events.” Cambridge Architectural Research Ltd, Cambridge, U.K.
Spence, R., and So, E. (2011). “Human casualties in earthquakes: Modelling and mitigation.” Proc., Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sudhakumar, J. (2001). “Methods of repairing concrete structures.” Proc., 26th Conf. on Our World in Concrete and Structures, CI‐Premier PTE, Singapore, 605–612.
Taflanidis, A. A., and Beck, J. L. (2009). “Life-cycle cost optimal design of passive dissipative devices.” Struct. Saf., 31(6), 508–522.
Tantala, M. W., Nordenson, G. J., Deodatis, G., and Jacob, K. (2008). “Earthquake loss estimation for the New York City metropolitan region.” Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 28(10), 812–835.
TCR (The Climate Registry). (2008). “General reporting protocol for the voluntary reporting program.” Los Angeles.
U.S. GBC (U.S. Green Building Council). (2009). “LEED reference guide for green building design and construction.” Washington, DC.
Valcárcel, J. A., Mora, M. G., Cardona, O. D., Pujades, L. G., Barbat, A. H., and Bernal, G. A. (2013). “Methodology and applications for the benefit cost analysis of the seismic risk reduction in building portfolios at broadscale.” Nat. Hazard., 69(1), 845–868.
Wei, H. H, et al. (2014). “Benefit-cost analysis of the seismic risk mitigation for a region with moderate seismicity: The case of Tiberias, Israel.” Procedia Eng., 85, 536–542.
Wei, H. H., Skibniewski, M. J., Shohet, I. M., and X., Y. (2015). “Life cycle environmental performance of natural hazard mitigation for buildings.” J. Perform. Constr. Facil, 04015042.
Zhang, H., Xing, F., and Liu, J. (2011). “Rehabilitation decision‐making for buildings in the Wenchuan area.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 29(6), 569–578.
Zou, X., Teng, J. G., De Lorenzis, L., and Xia, S. (2007). “Optimal performance-based design of FRP jackets for seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames.” Composites Part B, 38(5), 584–597.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22Issue 1March 2016

History

Received: Dec 4, 2014
Accepted: Jul 27, 2015
Published online: Dec 2, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: May 2, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

ASCE Technical Topics:

Authors

Affiliations

Hsi-Hsien Wei, S.M.ASCE [email protected]
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Igal M. Shohet
Associate Professor, Dept. of Structural Engineering, Ben-Gurion University, Beersheba, Israel.
Mirosław J. Skibniewski, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Stav Shapira
Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Emergency Medicine, Ben-Gurion University, Beersheba, Israel.
Xijun Yao
M.S. Candidate, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share