Technical Paper
Nov 5, 2015

Fuzzy Logic and Analytic Hierarchy Process–Based Conceptual Model for Sustainable Commercial Building Assessment for India

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 1

Abstract

The impact of buildings on the environment has created the need for green or sustainable buildings, which aim to reduce energy and resource consumption. Sustainable building assessment methods have emerged in recent years as a means to evaluate the performance of buildings across a broad range of sustainability considerations. This research presents a conceptual model for the assessment of sustainable commercial buildings with the use of fuzzy logic and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). It covers 100 sustainability criteria. The proposed building evaluation model depends on two types of parameters: endogenous (constants: global weights of criteria) and exogenous (variables: performance score of building for each criterion). A building’s sustainability score reflects the interplay between these two parameters. Global weights of criteria can be developed through AHP. The performance scores of criteria can be determined through fuzzy logic. The proposed approach of building evaluation can produce significant benefits that are not likely to result from conventional practices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Ali, H. H., and Al Nsairat, S. F. (2009). “Developing a green building assessment tool for developing countries—Case of Jordan.” Build. Environ., 44(5), 1053–1064.
AlWaer, H., and Clements-Croome, D. J. (2010). “Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings.” Build. Environ., 45(4), 799–807.
AlWaer, H., Sibley, M., and Lewis, J. (2008a). “Factors and priorities for assessing sustainability of regional shopping centres in the UK.” Archit. Sci. Rev., 51(4), 391–402.
AlWaer, H., Sibley, M., and Lewis, J. (2008b). “Different stakeholders perceptions of sustainability assessment.” Archit. Sci. Rev., 51(1), 48–59.
Andresen, I. (2000). “Multi-criteria decision-making in green building design.” Proc., International Conf. on Sustainable Building 2000, NOVEM & VROM, Maastricht, the Netherlands, 153–155.
Bhatt, R., and Macwan, J. E. M. (2012). “Global weights of parameters for sustainable buildings from consultants’ perspectives in Indian context.” J. Archit. Eng., 18(3), 233–241.
Boussabaine, A. H., and Elhag, T. (1999). “Applying fuzzy techniques to cash flow analysis.” Constr. Manage. Econ., 17(6), 745–755.
Cole, R. J. (1998). “Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods.” Build. Res. Inf., 26(1), 3–16.
Crawley, D. and Aho, I. (1999). Building environmental assessment methods: applications and development trends.” Build. Res. Inf., 27(4-5), 300–308.
Dewick, P., and Miozzo, M. (2002). “Sustainable technologies and the innovation–regulation paradox.” Futures, 34(9–10), 823–840.
Ding, G. K. (2008). “Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools.” J. Environ. Manage., 86(3), 451–464.
Dweiri, F. (1999). “Fuzzy development of crisp activity relationship charts for facilities layout.” Comput. Ind. Eng., 36(1), 1–16.
Energy Information Administration (2006). International energy outlook 2006, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
Gibberd, J. (2005). “Assessing sustainable buildings in developing countries—The Sustainable Building Assessment Tool (SBAT) and the Sustainable Building Lifecycle (SBL).” The 2005 World Sustainable Building Conf., Tokyo.
GSA Public Buildings Service Report (2008). “Assessing green building performance.” 〈http://www.gsa.gov/graphics/pbs/GSA_AssessGreen_white_paper.pdf〉 (Apr. 3, 2015).
Harris, D. J. (1999). “A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials.” Build. Environ., 34(6), 751–758.
Heerwagen, J. (2002). “Sustainable design can be an asset to the bottom line—Expanded Internet edition.” 〈http://www.edcmag.com/CDA/ArticleInformation/features/BNP__Features__Item/0,4120,80724,00.htm〉 (April 3, 2015).
Indian Green Building Council (2007). LEED INDIA NC reference guide, Version 1.0, Confederation of Indian Industry, New Delhi, India.
International Energy Agency (2004). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, International Energy Agency, Paris.
Kaatz, E., Root, D., and Bowen, P. (2005). “Broadening project participation through a modified building sustainability assessment.” Build. Res. Inf., 33(5), 441–454.
Kibert, C. J. (2005). Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Kim, S., Yang, I., Yeo, M., and Kim, K. (2005). “Development of a housing performance evaluation model for multi-family residential buildings in Korea.” Build. Environ., 40(8), 1103–1116.
Lee, C. (1990). “Fuzzy logic in control systems: Fuzzy logic parts I, II.” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 20(2), 419–435.
Lee, W. L., and Burnett, J. (2006). “Customization of GBTool in Hong Kong.” Build. Environ., 41(12), 1831–1846.
Lee, W. L., Chau, C. K., Yik, F. W. H., Burnett, J., and Tse, M. S. (2002). “On the study of the credit-weighting scale in a building environmental assessment scheme.” Build. Environ., 37(12), 1385–1396.
Loftness, V., et al. (2002). “Building Investment Decisions Support (BIDS).” ABSIC Research 2001–2002 Year-End Rep.http://www.aia.org/aiaucmp/groups/ek_public/documents/pdf/aiap080050.pdf〉 (April 2, 2015).
MathWorks (1993). MATLAB high-performance numeric computation and visualization software, user’s guide, MathWorks, Natick, MA.
Patermann, C. (1999). “The fifth EU framework programme and its April 2, 2015 consequences for construction industry.” Build. Res. Inf., 27(6), 412–418.
Polo, J. (2001). “Development and testing of a number of MATLAB based fuzzy system applications.” Project Rep., Univ. of Warwick, Warwick, U.K.
Shi, H. (2009). “Theoretical study on comprehensive assessment of green building.” Third International Symp. on Intelligent Information Technology Application, IEEE Computer Society Conference Publishing Service, Washington, DC.
Soebarto, V. I., and Williamson, T. J. (2001). “Multi-criteria assessment of building performance: Theory and implementation.” Build. Environ., 36(6), 681–690.
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Harvey, L. D. D., Mirasgedis, S., and Levine, M. D. (2007). “Mitigating CO2 emissions from energy use in the world's buildings.” Build. Res. Inf., 35(4), 379–398.
Vakili-Ardebili, A., and Boussabaine, A. H. (2007a). “Application of fuzzy techniques to develop an assessment framework for building design eco-drivers.” Build. Environ., 42(11), 3785–3800.
Vakili-Ardebili, A., and Boussabaine, A. H. (2007b). “Design eco-drivers.” J. Archit., 12(3), 315–332.
Velasquez, M., and Hester, P. T. (2013). “An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods.” Int. J. Oper. Res., 10(2), 56–66.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). “Information and control. Fuzzy sets.” 〈http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~zadeh/papers/Fuzzy%20Sets-Information%20and%20Control-1965.pdf〉 (April 2, 2015).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22Issue 1March 2016

History

Received: Nov 7, 2014
Accepted: Jun 24, 2015
Published online: Nov 5, 2015
Published in print: Mar 1, 2016
Discussion open until: Apr 5, 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Rajiv Bhatt, Ph.D. [email protected]
Associate Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., A. D. Patel Institute of Technology, New Vallabh Vidyanagar, Gujarat 388121, India (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
J. E. M. Macwan, Ph.D. [email protected]
Professor, Civil Engineering Dept., Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Ichhanath, Surat, Gujarat 395007, India. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share