Content Analysis of Home Energy Audit Reports: Quantitative Methodology for Standardization
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 21, Issue 4
Abstract
Home energy assessments or audits help homeowners diagnose and analyze the energy use in their homes. Assisted, traditional, and deep levels of these audits involve a trained auditor conducting energy analyses on the building structure. Findings from these audits are presented to the homeowner in a report format. Currently, a variety of content presented in the reports is confusing to homeowners. Energy assessments are predominantly carried out by technical professionals who may lack training and skills to address the voice of the customer, in this case, the homeowner. Report content output is served in the traditional engineering paradigm of building science and energy engineering problem solving. This research uses expert opinion to validate the content that is important for presentation in reports by energy professionals. The results then provide a basis for examining current industry practice and identify new research gaps for further development, particularly in the domain of design for human factors. Homeowners are left with little decision-making support owing to a lack of understanding or consensus among auditors in how to design effective reports. This research uses content analysis to quantitatively consolidate subject matter expert opinion to identify the essential components in a home energy audit report. It is concluded that there are two essential sections: (1) a summary of the audit experience, and (2) a summary of recommendations; and two essential formatting options: (1) building photographs, and (2) numbers presented in actual units. Adding specialization or personalization is useful, but only with the knowledge of homeowner motivators, expectations, and abilities. Providing numerical consolidation of audit report content increases the consistency of quality in the home energy auditing process, customized report design, and generation of formats.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Ayres, I., Raseman, S., and Shih, A. (2009). “Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy usage.” Rep. No. w15386, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
BPI (Building Performance Institute). (2010). “BPI 101: Home energy auditing standard.” 〈http://www.bpi.org/Web%20Download/BPI%20Standards/BPI-101%20Revised%20Home%20Energy%20Auditing%20Standard%20May%205%202010.pdf〉.
Desmedt, J., Vekemans, G., and Maes, D. (2009). “Ensuring effectiveness of information to influence household behavior.” J. Cleaner Prod., 17(4), 455–462.
Ek, K., and Söderholm, P. (2010). “The devil is in the details: Household electricity saving behavior and the role of information.” Energy Policy, 38(3), 1578–1587.
Florida Power and Light. (2012). “Online home energy survey.” 〈http://www.fpl.com/residential/energy_saving/programs/ohes.shtml〉 (Jul. 15, 2013).
Hinsey, J. (2012). “An evaluation of the sustainability and scalability of business models that support low-cost assisted home energy assessments using a cost benefit analysis.” Master’s thesis, College of Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, PA.
Ladipo, O. E. (2013). “An effort to refine home energy assessment methods in support of retrofit decision making.” Master’s thesis, College of Architecture and Urban Studies, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA. 〈http://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/23151/Ladipo_OE_T_2013.pdf?sequence=1〉 (Nov. 10, 2014).
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (2012). “Home energy saver.” DOE 〈http://hes.lbl.gov/consumer〉 (Jul. 15, 2013).
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). “A quantitative approach to content validity.” Pers. Psychol., 28(4), 563–575.
Magat, W. A., Payne, J. W., and Brucato, P. F., Jr. (1986). “How important is information format? An experimental study of home energy audit programs.” J. Policy Anal. Manage., 6(1), 20–34.
Murphy, L., Meijer, F., and Visscher, H. (2012). “A qualitative evaluation of policy instruments used to improve energy performance of existing private dwellings in the Netherlands.” Energy Policy, 45, 459–468.
Parnell, R., and Popovic-Larsen, O. (2005). “Developing the home energy report: An everyday householder-centered approach.” Energy Build., 37(10), 1092–1103.
Pierce, J., Schiano, D. J., and Paulos, E. (2010). “Home, habits, and energy: Examining domestic interactions and energy consumption.” Proc., 28th Int. Conf. on CHI, ACM, Atlanta, GA, 1985–1994.
Riley, D. R., Whelton, M., Mohr, N., and Barsom, S. (2012). “An analysis of home energy assessments.” White paper, Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, PA, 1–7.
RESNET. (2012). “Home energy rating standards of practice.” 1–13. 〈http://www.resnet.us/standards/rating_standards.pdf〉 (Jul. 14, 2013).
Southern California Edison (2012). “Home energy efficiency survey.” Edison International Company, 〈http://www.sce.com/_Tools/Residential/homeenergysurvey.htm〉 (Jul. 14, 2013).
Sprehn, K. A. (2014). “Individual differences and the effect of information format on decision making.” Ph.D. dissertation, College of Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, PA.
Stern, P. C. (2000). “Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior.” J. Soc. Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
Sutcliffe, M., and Hooper, P. (2008). “Can eco‐footprinting analysis be used successfully to encourage more sustainable behavior at the household level?” Sustainable Dev., 16(1), 1–16.
Syal, M. G., Duah, D., Samuel, S., Mazor, M., Mo, Y., and Cyr, T. (2014). “Information framework for intelligent decision support system for home energy retrofits.” J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 04013030.
Williamson, T. J., Soebarto, V., Bennetts, H., and Radford, A. (2006). “House/home energy rating schemes/systems (HERS).” Proc., 23rd Conf. on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Geneva, Switzerland, 6–8.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 21 • Issue 4 • December 2015
Copyright
© 2015 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jan 23, 2014
Accepted: Oct 31, 2014
Published online: Apr 3, 2015
Discussion open until: Sep 3, 2015
Published in print: Dec 1, 2015
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.