Life-Cycle Environmental Impact Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Subjected to Natural Hazards
Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22, Issue 4
Abstract
With the occurrence of devastating natural disasters worldwide, even though initially used interchangeably with green or environmental development, sustainability has evolved to possess social and economic implications as well. Therefore, a complete sustainability assessment of any civil infrastructure requires an evaluation of its three major components: cost, and environmental and social impacts. Because the construction industry is a pioneer in the sustainability movement, the civil engineering community at large needs an integrated methodology for conducting sustainability assessment of civil infrastructure. This paper focuses on the environmental impact assessment component of sustainability within a comprehensive framework for conducting a life-cycle assessment of structures subjected to natural hazards. Although environmental emissions and waste generation in the initial manufacturing and construction phases make significant contributions to the total environmental impact, long-term structural performance (including damage resulting from natural hazards) plays an important role in the sustainability of a structure. The damage experienced by a structure in future natural hazards might substantially increase the total environmental impact because of repair activities. In this paper, a life-cycle environmental impact assessment methodology is proposed with specific emphasis on RC buildings subjected to earthquakes. The methodology is applied to a RC building, and the results confirm the importance of the life-cycle environmental impact assessment as an essential component of sustainability in the presence of seismic threats.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2011). “Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary.” ACI 318-11, Farmington Hills, MI.
Arroyo, D., Teran-Gilmore, A., and Ordaz, M. (2012). “Seismic loss estimation including environmental losses.” Proc., 15th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, 15WCEE Conf. Secretariat, Lisbon, Portugal.
Årskog, V., Fossdal, S., and Gjorv, O. E. (2004). “Life-cycle assessment of repair and maintenance systems for concrete structures.” Proc., Int. Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology, Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA, 193–200.
ASCE. (2010). “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures.” ASCE 7-10, Reston, VA.
Bare, J. (2011). “TRACI 2.0: The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0.” Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 13(5), 687–696.
Bare, J. C., and Gloria, T. P. (2006). “Critical analysis of the mathematical relationships and comprehensiveness of life cycle impact assessment approaches.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(4), 1104–1113.
Björklund, T., Jönsson, Å., and Tillman, A.-M. (1996). “LCA of building frame structures: Environmental impact over the life cycle of concrete and steel frames.” Rep. 1997:2, Chalmers Univ. of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Chiu, C. (2012). “Cost-benefits and environmental impact of seismic retrofit for low-rise reinforced concrete buildings.” Proc., Life-Cycle and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure Systems, A. Strauss, D. M. Frangopol, and K. Bergmeister, eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1063–1068.
Court, A., Simonen, K., Webster, M., Trusty, W., and Morris, P. (2012). “Linking next-generation performance-based seismic design criteria to environmental performance (ATC-86 and ATC-58).” Proc., 43rd ASCE Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 922–928.
Deierlein, G. G., Krawinkler, H., and Cornell, C. A. (2003). “A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Pacific Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Christchurch, New Zealand, 140–147.
Dong, Y., Frangopol, D. M., and Saydam, D. (2013). “Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam. 42(10), 1451–1467.
Elnashai, A. S., and Di Sarno, L. (2008). Fundamentals of earthquake engineering, Wiley, Chichester, U.K.
Elnashai, A. S., Papanikolaou, V. K., and Lee, D. (2010). ZEUS NL—A system for inelastic analysis of structures, Mid-America Earthquake Center, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineeering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL.
EPA. (2000). “Building savings strategies for waste reduction of construction and demolition debris from buildings, solid waste and emergency response (5306W).” EPA-530-F-00-001, Washington, DC.
EPA. (2004). “RCRA in focus: Construction, demolition and renovation, solid waste and emergency response (5305W).” EPA-530-K-04-005, Washington, DC.
EPA. (2006). “Clean energy power profiler.” 〈http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/egrid/index.html〉 (Mar. 31, 2013).
FEMA. (2003). “NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, Part 1: Provisions.” FEMA 450, Washington, DC.
Frischknecht, R., et al. (2007). “Overview and methodology. EcoInvent Data v2.” Final EcoInvent Rep. No. 1, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
Gencturk, B. (2013). “Life-cycle cost assessment of RC and ECC frames using structural optimization.” Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam., 42(1), 61–79.
Gencturk, B., and Hossain, K. A. (2013a). “Optimal design of RC frames using nonlinear inelastic analysis.” Computational methods in earthquake engineering, M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis, and V. Plevris, eds., Vol. 30, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 545–568.
Gencturk, B., and Hossain, K. A. (2013b). “Structural performance assessment in the context of seismic sustainability.” 2013 Int. Concrete Sustainability Conf., National Ready Mix Concrete Association, Silver Spring, MD.
Guggemos, A. (2003). “Environmental impacts of onsite construction processes: Focus on structural frames.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
International Code Council. (2009). International building code, Washington, DC.
ISO. (2006a). “Environmental management–Life cycle assessment–Principles and framework.” ISO 14040, Geneva, Switzerland.
ISO. (2006b). “Environmental management–Life cycle assessment–Requirements and guidelines.” ISO 14044, Geneva, Switzerland.
Johnson, T. W. (2006). Comparison of environmental impacts of steel and concrete as building materials using the life cycle assessment method, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Jönsson, Å., Björklund, T., and Tillman, A.-M. (1998). “LCA of concrete and steel building frames.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 3(4), 216–224.
Junnila, S., and Horvath, A. (2003). “Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building.” J. Infrastruct. Syst., 157–166.
Khasreen, M. M., Banfill, P. F. G., and Menzies, G. F. (2009). “Life-cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: A review.” Sustainability, 1(3), 674–701.
Lippiatt, B. C. (2007). BEESRG 4.0: Building for environmental and economic sustainability technical manual and user guide, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.
Masanet, E., Stadel, A., and Gursel, P. (2012). “Life-cycle evaluation of concrete building construction as a strategy for sustainable cities.” SN3119, Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL.
Matos, G., and Wagner, L. (1998). “Consumption of materials in the United States, 1900–1995.” Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 23(1), 107–122.
Moehle, J., and Deierlein, G. G. (2004). “A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering.” Proc., 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 679, 13WCEE Conf. Secretariat, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Orabi, W., Zhu, Y., and Ozcan-Deniz, G. (2012). “Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions from construction activities and processes.” Construction Research Congress 2012: Construction Challenges in a Flat World, H. Cai, A. Kandil, M. Hastak, and P. S. Dunston, eds., ASCE, Reston, VA, 1859–1868.
Porter, K. A. (2003). “An overview of PEER’s performance-based earthquake engineering methodology.” Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), Millpress, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 6–9.
Scheuer, C., Keoleian, G. A., and Reppe, P. (2003). “Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications.” Energy Build., 35(10), 1049–1064.
Scientific Applications International Corporation (SAIC). (2006). “Life-cycle assessment: Principles and practice.” EPA/600/R-06/060, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Reston, VA.
Sharma, A., Eligehausen, R., and Reddy, G. R. (2011). “A new model to simulate joint shear behavior of poorly detailed beam-column connections in RC structures under seismic loads, Part I: Exterior joints.” Eng. Struct., 33(3), 1034–1051.
Tapia, C., and Padgett, J. E. (2012). “Examining the integration of sustainability and natural hazard risk mitigation into life cycle analyses of structures.” Proc., 43rd ASCE Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA, 1929–1940.
U.S. Green Building Council. (2009). Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building rating system, Washington, DC.
Willard, B. (2002). The sustainability advantage: Seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line (conscientious commerce), New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC, Canada.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 22 • Issue 4 • December 2016
Copyright
© 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Apr 1, 2013
Accepted: Mar 11, 2014
Published online: Apr 15, 2014
Published in print: Dec 1, 2016
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.