Technical Papers
Dec 23, 2013

Using Eco-Indicator 99 to Evaluate Building Technologies under Life Cycle Assessment Uncertainties

Publication: Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 20, Issue 2

Abstract

The primary advantage offered by the Eco-indicator 99 (EI99) methodology is its ability to consider life cycle assessment (LCA) uncertainties. EI99 considers these uncertainties through a perspective-specified set that includes egalitarian/egalitarian (e/e), hierarchist/hierarchist (h/h), and individualist/individualist (i/i) methodological options, along with a perspective-averaged set that includes individualist/average (i/a), egalitarian/average (e/a), and hierarchist/average (h/a) methodological options. These two sets of options are based on a cultural theory framework that was initially intended for different areas of interest. The objective of this study was to determine the robustness of EI99 for the environmental evaluation of building technologies under LCA uncertainties. A split-unit design was used to determine the robustness of EI99 for evaluating four reinforced concrete technologies and four masonry structure technologies. A significant disordinal interaction was observed between the two methodological sets evaluated by EI99. The h/h and h/a options were considered to fall within the same area of interest. Different rankings for the building technologies were obtained using the different EI99 methodological options. A full set of EI99 methodological options should be used by building designers and practitioners to determine the impact of a preferred decision on the initial construction cost, the life-cycle cost, the embodied energy, occupant health, and resource and/or habitat conservation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Andrae, A., and Andersen, O. (2011). “Life cycle assessment of integrated circuit packaging technologies.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 16(3), 258–267.
Babbitt, C., and Lindner, A. (2008). “A life cycle comparison of disposal and beneficial use of coal combustion products in Florida, part 2: Impact assessment of disposal and beneficial use options.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13(7), 555–563.
Berrington de González, A., and Cox, D. (2007). “Interpretation of interaction: A review.” Ann. Appl. Stat., 1(2), 371–385.
Bovea, M., Cabello, R., and Querol, D. (2007). “Comparative life cycle assessment of commonly used refrigerants in commercial refrigeration systems.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 12(5), 299–307.
Brent, A., and Hietkamp, S. (2003). “Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment methods with a South African case study.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 8(1), 27–38.
Capello, C., Wernet, G., Sutter, J., Hellweg, S., and Hungerbuhler, K. (2009). “A comprehensive environmental assessment of petrochemical solvent production.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14(5), 467–479.
Castell, A., Menoufi, K., Gracia, A., Rinson, L., Boer, D., and Cabeza, L. (2013). “Life cycle assessment of alveolar brick construction system incorporating phase change materials (PCMs).” Appl. Energy, 101, 600–608.
Cordella, M., Tugnoli1, A., Spadoni, G., Santarelli, F., and Zangrando, T. (2008). “LCA of an Italian lager beer.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13(2), 133–139.
De Schryver, A. M. (2010). “Value choices in life cycle impact assessment.” Ph.D. thesis, Radboud Univ., Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Dreyer, L., Niemann, A., and Hauschild, M. (2003). “Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 8(4), 191–200.
Duan, H., Eugster, M., Hischier, R., Streicher-Porte, M., and Li, J. (2009). “Life cycle assessment study of a Chinese desktop personal computer.” Sci. Total Environ., 407(5), 1755–1764.
Fantozzi, F., and Buratti, C. (2010). “Life cycle assessment of biomass chains: Wood pellet from short rotation coppice using data measured on a real plant.” Biomass Bioenergy, 34(12), 1796–1804.
Gloria, T., et al. (2006). “Ecological toxicity methods and metals, an examination of two case studies.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 11(1), 26–33.
Goedkoop, M., De Schryver, A., Oele, M., Durksz, S., and de Roest, D. (2010). Introduction to LCA with SimaPro 7, PRé Consultants, San Francisco, CA.
Goedkoop, M., and Spriensma, R. (2001). The Eco-indicator 99—A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands, 3821.
Guo, M., and Murphy, R. (2012). “LCA data quality: Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis.” Sci. Total Environ., 435–436, 230–243.
Hofstetter, T., Capello, C., and Hungerbuhler, K. (2003). “Environmentally preferable treatment options for industrial waste solvent management, A case study of a toluene containing waste solvent.” Trans. IChemE. Part B, 81(3), 189–202.
Hung, M. L., and Ma, H. W. (2009). “Quantifying system uncertainty of life cycle assessment based on Monte Carlo simulation.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14, 19–27.
Hurlbert, S. H. (2013). “Pseudofactorialism, response structures and collective responsibility.” Austral Ecol., 38(6), 646–663.
ISO. (1997). “Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework.” ISO 14040:2006, Geneva.
Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection. (2013a). “Recycling companies.” Solid Waste Division, 〈http://www.sviva.gov.il/subjectsEnv/Waste/Management/Recycling/Documents/RecyclingCompanies.pdf〉 (Sep. 9, 2013) (in Hebrew).
Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection. (2013b). “Waste sites.” Solid Waste Division, 〈http://www.sviva.gov.il/subjectsEnv/Waste/WasteSites/Documents/ApprovedWasteSites/Waste-Building-Permit.pdf〉 (Sep. 9, 2013) (in Hebrew).
Laleman, R., Albrecht, J., and Dewulf, J. (2011). “Life cycle analysis to estimate the environmental impact of residential photovoltaic systems in regions with a low solar irradiation.” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15(1), 267–281.
Lee, K. M., and Park, P. J. (2005). “Estimation of the environmental credit for the recycling of granulated blast furnace slag based on LCA.” Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 44(2), 139–151.
Mahoney, W., and Cleveland, A. (1988). Means man-hour standards for construction, R.S. Means Company, Norcross, GA.
Matthews, H. S., and Small, M. J. (2000). “Extending the boundaries of life-cycle assessment through environmental economic input-output models.” J. Ind. Ecol., 4(3), 7–10.
Menoufi, K., Castell, A., Mohammed, M., Farid, M., Boer, D., and Cabeza, L. (2013). “Life cycle assessment of experimental cubicles including PCM manufactured from natural resources (esters): A theoretical study.” Renew. Energy, 51, 398–403.
Menoufi, K., Castell, A., Navarro, L., Perez, G., Boer, D., and Cabeza, L. (2012). “Evaluation of the environmental impact of experimental cubicles using life cycle assessment: A highlight on the manufacturing phase.” Appl. Energy, 92, 534–544.
Mizsey, P., Delgado, L., and Benko, T. (2009). “Comparison of environmental impact and external cost assessment methods.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14(7), 665–675.
Newman, I., and Newman, C. (1994). Conceptual statistics for beginners, University Press of America, London.
Ortiz, M., Raluy, R., Serra, L., and Uche, J. (2007). “Life cycle assessment of water treatment technologies: Wastewater and water-reuse in a small town.” Desalination, 204(1–3), 121–131.
Pieragostini, C., Mussati, M., and Aguirre, P. (2012). “On process optimization considering LCA methodology.” J. Environ. Manage., 96(1), 43–54.
Pisoni, E., Raccanelli, R., Dotelli, G., Botta, D., and Melià, P. (2009). “Accounting for transportation impacts in the environmental assessment of waste management plans.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14(3), 248–256.
Pizzol, M., Christensen, P., Schmidt, J., and Thomsen, M. (2011). “Impacts of “metals” on human health: A comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA).” J. Clean. Prod., 19(6-7), 646–656.
Pushkar, S. (2007). “Design of sustainable buildings—Implementation of multi-objective optimization.” Ph.D. thesis, Technion – IIT, Haifa, Israel.
Pushkar, S., Becker, R., and Katz, A. (2005). “A methodology for design of environmentally optimal buildings by variable grouping.” Build. Environ., 40(8), 1126–1139.
Raluy, R., Serra, L., and Uche, J. (2005). “Life cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with renewable energies.” Desalination, 183(1–3), 81–93.
Raluy, R., Serra, L., Uche, J., and Valero, A. (2004). “Life-cycle assessment of desalination technologies integrated with energy production systems.” Desalination, 167, 445–458.
Renou, S., Thomas, J., Aoustin, E., and Pons, M. (2008). “Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA.” J. Clean. Prod., 16(10), 1098–1105.
Rey Martínez, F. J., et al. (2011). “Life cycle assessment of a semi-indirect ceramic evaporative cooler vs. a heat pump in two climate areas of Spain.” Appl. Energy, 88(3), 914–921.
Shah, V., and Ries, R. (2009). “A characterization model with spatial and temporal resolution for life cycle impact assessment of photochemical precursors in the United States.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 14(4), 313–327.
Shiojiri, K., Yamasaki, A., Fujii, M., Kiyono, F., and Yanagisawa, Y. (2006). “Life cycle impact assessment of various treatment scenarios for sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) used as insulating gas.” Environ. Prog., 25(3), 218–227.
SimaPro 7.3.3 2011 [Computer software]. Amersfoort, Netherlands, PRé Consultants.
Singh, A., Berghorn, G., Joshi, S., and Syal, M. (2011). “Review of life-cycle assessment applications in building construction.” J. Archit. Eng., 15–23.
Southern-Tool. (2013) “Tool catalog.” 〈http://www.southern-tool.com〉 (Sep. 9, 2013).
Thabrew, L., Lloyd, S., Cypcar, C., Hamilton, J., and Ries, R. (2008). “Life cycle assessment of water-based acrylic floor finish maintenance programs.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 13(1), 65–74.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory, Westview, Boulder, CO.
Thormark, C. (2000). “Environmental analysis of a building with reused building materials.” Int J Low Energy Sust Build., 1, 〈http://www.academia.edu/2370390/Environmental_analysis_of_a_building_with_reused_building_materials〉 (Dec. 12, 2013).
Van Caneghem, J., Block, C., and Vandecasteele, C. (2010a). “Assessment of the impact on human health of industrial emissions to air: Does the result depend on the applied method?” J. Hazard. Mater., 184(1–3), 788–797.
Van Caneghem, J., Vermeulen, I., Block, C., Cramm, P., Mortier, R., and Vandecasteele, C. (2010b). “Abiotic depletion due to resource consumption in a steelwork assessed by five different methods.” Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 54(12), 1067–1073.
Wager, P., Hischier, R., and Eugster, M. (2011). “Environmental impacts of the Swiss collection and recovery systems for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE): A follow-up.” Sci. Total Environ., 409(10), 1746–1756.
Wernet, G., Conradt, S., Isenring, H., Jimenez-Gonzalez, C., and Hungerbuhler, K. (2010). “Life cycle assessment of fine chemical production: A case study of pharmaceutical synthesis.” Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 15(3), 294–303.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Architectural Engineering
Journal of Architectural Engineering
Volume 20Issue 2June 2014

History

Received: May 2, 2013
Accepted: Nov 19, 2013
Published online: Dec 23, 2013
Discussion open until: May 23, 2014
Published in print: Jun 1, 2014

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Svetlana Pushkar [email protected]
Lecturer, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ariel Univ., Ariel 40700, Israel. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share