Seismic Rotational Stability of Waterfront Retaining Wall Using Pseudodynamic Method
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 10, Issue 1
Abstract
Design of waterfront retaining walls under seismic conditions is an important topic of research among the geotechnical engineering fraternity, and recently there have been studies in which the stability of rigid waterfront retaining walls has been assessed. However, an important aspect of seismic rotational stability of such walls is still missing from the literature archives. The present study shows the importance of rotational displacements for the design of the rigid waterfront retaining wall. Consideration has been made for the calculation of the hydrodynamic pressure as well as the seismic forces, both due to the seismic pressure and seismic wall inertia. These seismic forces have been calculated using the pseudodynamic approach. The free water condition has been considered in the analysis, and thus the hydrodynamic pressure has been considered to exist on the downstream face of the retaining wall as well, and a well-known expression approximating the effect of the inertia of the water due to the earthquake has been used for the estimation of this hydrodynamic pressure force. Simple expressions for the calculation of rotational displacement both during and after the earthquake have been proposed, and typical results have been obtained. It is observed that with an increase in the ratio of the water level to the total height of the wall from 0.50 to 1.00 the rotational displacement of the wall increases by about 110%. Similar trend of an increase in the value of the rotational displacement was observed for an increase in the values of the horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration coefficients. Also, the parametric study carried out in the analysis suggested that the rotational displacement is sensitive to other parameters such as the upstream water height, pore pressure ratio, soil, and wall friction angles. Due to nonavailability of the results in which rotational stability of the waterfront retaining wall under the seismic conditions has been studied, the results from the present analysis seem to bring out a unique approach.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers want to acknowledge the technical suggestions and advise provided by the editor to make this paper technically more sound.
References
Choudhury, D., and Ahmad, S. M. (2007a). “Design of waterfront retaining wall for the passive case under earthquake and tsunami.” Appl. Ocean Res., 29(1–2), 37–44.
Choudhury, D., and Ahmad, S. M. (2007b). “Stability of waterfront retaining wall subjected to pseudo-static earthquake forces.” Ocean Eng., 34(14–15), 1947–1954.
Choudhury, D., and Ahmad, S. M. (2008). “Stability of waterfront retaining wall subjected to pseudodynamic earthquake forces.” J. Waterway, Port, Coastal, Ocean Eng., 134(4), 252–260.
Choudhury, D., and Nimbalkar, S. (2005). “Seismic passive resistance by pseudo-dynamic method.” Geotechnique, 55(9), 699–702.
Choudhury, D., and Nimbalkar, S. S. (2006). “Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall.” Geotech. Geol. Eng., 24, 1103–1113.
Choudhury, D., and Nimbalkar, S. S. (2007). “Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudo-dynamic method: Passive case.” Soil. Dyn. Earthquake Eng., 27(3), 242–249.
Choudhury, D., and Nimbalkar, S. S. (2008). “Seismic rotational displacement of gravity walls by pseudo-dynamic method.” Int. J. Geomech., 8(3), 169–175.
Ebeling, R. M., and Morrison, E. E., Jr. (1992). “The seismic design of waterfront retaining structures.” U.S. Army Technical Rep. No. ITL-92-11, Washington, D.C.
Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Nadim, F., and Whitman, R. V. (1984). “Coupled sliding and tilting of gravity retaining walls.” Proc., 8th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, 477–484.
Newmark, N. (1965). “Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments.” Geotechnique, 15(2), 139–160.
Richards, R., Jr., and Elms, D. G. (1979). “Seismic behavior of gravity retaining walls.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., 105(4), 449–469.
Richards, R., Jr., Elms, D. G., and Budhu, M. (1990). “Dynamic fluidization of soils.” J. Geotech. Eng., 116(5), 740–759.
Steedman, R. S., and Zeng, X. (1990). “The influence of phase on the calculation of pseudo-static earth pressure on a retaining wall.” Geotechnique, 40, 103–112.
Steedman, R. S., and Zeng, X. (1996). “Rotation of large gravity walls on rigid foundations under seismic loading.” Geotech. Spec. Pub., 60, 38–56.
Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil mechanics, Wiley, New York.
Westergaard, H. M. (1933). “Water pressures on dams during earthquakes.” Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 98, 418–433.
Whitman, R. V., and Liao, S. (1985). “Seismic design of gravity retaining walls.” Proc., 8th World Conf. Earthquake Eng., Vol. III, 533–540.
Zeng, X., and Steedman, R. S. (2000). “Rotating block method for seismic displacement of gravity walls.” J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 126(8), 709–717.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 10 • Issue 1 • February 2010
Pages: 45 - 52
Copyright
© 2010 ASCE.
History
Received: May 20, 2008
Accepted: Aug 10, 2009
Published online: Jan 15, 2010
Published in print: Feb 2010
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.