Back-Analysis Approach for the Design of Drainage Systems
Publication: International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 7, Issue 5
Abstract
The geotechnical design of drainage or dewatering systems requires a free surface seepage analysis to evaluate the water flux that corresponds to the sought lowering of the water table. It is observed in practice that sometimes the calculated flux is not sufficient to reach the predicted result, even when the hydraulic conductivity of the soil mass has been properly determined. This prevents the initiation of the in situ works (e.g., excavation) with a relevant economical loss. The possible causes of this problem are investigated through a series of two- and three-dimensional unconfined seepage analyses. They show that the numerical results strongly depend on the characteristics of the numerical model and that, consequently, the computed fluxes and lowering of the water table do not necessarily correspond to the field conditions. To overcome this drawback a back-analysis approach is suggested for calibrating the numerical model adopted in design. An application of this technique to an actual field problem is finally discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to thank A. Convento and A. Ivis of Varisco Wellpoint Co. for their comments on the well point technology and M. Chiorboli of Milan Subway Co. (Metropolitana Milanese) who kindly provided the results of the in situ test.
References
Bathe, K. J., and Khoshgoftaar, M. R. (1979). “Finite element free surface seepage analysis without mesh iteration.” Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Meth. Geomech., 3(13), 13–22.
Borja, R. I., and Kishnani, S. S. (1991). “On the solution of elliptic free-boundary problems via Newton’s method.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 88, 341–361.
Cividini, A., and Gioda, G. (1989). “On the variable mesh finite element analysis of unconfined seepage problems.” Geotechnique, 39(2), 251–267.
Cividini, A., and Gioda, G. (2003). “Back analysis of geotechnical problems.” Numerical analysis and modelling in geomechanics, J. W. Bull, ed., Chap. 6, Spoon, London, 165–196.
Desai, C. S. (1976). “Finite element residual scheme for unconfined flow.” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 10, 1415–1418.
Desai, C. S., and Li, C. G. (1983). “A residual flow procedure and application for free surface flow in porous media.” Adv. Water Resour., 6, 27–35.
Gioda, G., and Sakurai, S. (1987). “Back analysis procedures for the interpretation of field measurements in geomechanics.” Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Meth. Geomech., 11(6), 555–583.
Himmelblau, D. M. (1972). Applied nonlinear programming, McGraw-Hill, NewYork.
His, J. P., Carter, J. P., and Small, J. C. (1994). “Surface subsidence and drawdown of the water table due to pumping.” Geotechnique, 44(3), 381–396.
McCarthy, D. F. (1998). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
Rosenbrock, H. H. (1960). “An automatic method for finding the greatest or least value of a function.” Comput. J., 3, 175–184.
Schwartz, F. W., and Zhang, H. (2003). Fundamentals of ground water, Wiley, London.
Taylor, R. L., and Brown, C. B. (1967). “Darcy flow solution with a free surface.” J. Hydr. Div., 93(2), 25–33.
Zaman, M., Gioda, G., and Booker, J., eds. (2000). Modeling in geomechanics, Wiley, London.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
International Journal of Geomechanics
Volume 7 • Issue 5 • September 2007
Pages: 325 - 332
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 12, 2007
Accepted: May 3, 2007
Published online: Sep 1, 2007
Published in print: Sep 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.