Testing Methods to Determine Properties of Fiber Reinforced Plastic Panels Used for Reinforcing Glulams
Publication: Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 1, Issue 4
Abstract
The use of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) panels to reinforce wood and wood composites, particularly glued laminated timber (glulam), has gained acceptance by the wood industry recently. The reinforced glulam exhibits substantial advantages in its structural and economical performance. The FRP used in the glulam reinforcement is in thin panel form with a thickness of 0.05–0.095 in. It is composed of 100% unidirectional high modulus fibers, such as aramids, carbon, or fiberglass. The fibers are embedded in a thermosetting plastic matrix in either pure or hybrid form. The fiber to resin ratio is approximately 66% by volume. Physical, mechanical, and durability properties are the most interesting properties for practice engineers and manufacturers to know. To select appropriate test methods for the evaluation of these properties is crucial for the ensuring of accurate design values. The intention of this paper is to provide a rational model for other engineers, researchers, and manufacturers to use in bringing FRP products into infrastructure and building construction places. This paper evaluated and recommended selection of existing test methods. FRP has been tested using selected test methods. Data gathered from these tests are reported in the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bowman, J., and Barker, M. B.(1986). “A methodology for describing creep-fatigue interactions in thermoplastic components.”Polymer Engrg. and Sci., 26, 1582–90.
2.
Chatterjee, S. N., Adams, D. F., Oplinger, D. W. (1993).“Test methods for composites—A status report, Vol. II. Compression test methods.”Rep. DPT/FAA/CT-93/17 NJ, Federal Aviation Administration, Atlantic City International Airport, Atlantic City, N.J.
3.
Chen, A. S., and Harris, B.(1993). “Fatigue-induced damage mechanisms in carbon fiber-reinforced plastic composites.”J. Mat. Sci., 28, 2013–27.
4.
Daniel, I. M., Hsiao, H. M., Wooh, S. C., Vittoser, J. (1993). “Processing and compressive behavior of thick composites.”Proc., 18th Annu. Mech. of Compos. Rev.
5.
“Evaluation Report 5100 Appendix E.” (1995). International Conference of Building Officials Evaluation Service, Whittier, Calif.
6.
Grediac, M., Pierron, F., and Vautrin, A.(1994). “The Iosipescu in-plane shear test applied to composites—a new approach base don displacement field processing.”Compos. Sci. and Technol., 51(3), 409–417.
7.
Häberle, J. G. (1991). “Strength and failure mechanisms of unidirectional carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics under axial compression,” Doctoral thesis, Aeronautics Department, Imperial College, University of London, U.K.
8.
Häberle, J. G., and Matthews, F. L.(1994). “The influence of test piece preparation on the compressive strength of unidirectional fiber-reinforced plastic.”J. Testing and Evaluation, 22, 360–364.
9.
Hung, Y. Y.(1982). “Shearography—a new optical method for strain measurement and non-destructive testing.”Optical Engrg., 21, 391–395.
10.
Katouzian, M., Brüller, O. S., and Horoschenkoff, A.(1995). “On the effect of temperature on the creep behavior of neat and carbon fiber reinforced PEEK and epoxy resin.”J. Compos. Mat., 29(3), 372–87.
11.
Kessler, J. A., and Adams, D. F. (1993). “Standardization of test methods for laminated composites—Volume II: experimental effort.”Tech. Final Rep. MSC TFR 33143/1706002, Composite Materials Research Group, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyo.
12.
Perry, M. C., Vail, M. A., and Devries, K. L.(1995). “Effect of NOx environments and stress on degradation of mechanical properties of Kevlar 49 and Nylon 6.”Polymer Engrg. and Sci., 35, 411–18.
13.
Shang, H. M., Toh, S. L., Chau, F. S., Shim, V. P. W., and Tay, C. J. (1991). “Locating and sizing disbonds in glassfiber-reinforced plastic plates using shearography.”J. Engrg. Mat. and Technol., January 1991 113, 99–103.
14.
Tan, S. C.(1991). “Analysis of ASTM D3410 compression test specimens.”AIAA J., 29, 1344–6.
15.
Tingley, D. A. (1994). “Aligned fiber reinforcement panel for structural wood members.”U.S. Patent Document No. 5,362,545.
16.
Toh, S L., Chau, F. S., Chang, H. M., and Tay, C. J. (1987). “Flaw detection in composites using shearography.”Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Compos. Mat. and the 2nd Eur. Conf. on Compos. Mat., London, U.K.
17.
Wardle, J. G., and Steenkamer, D. A. (1987). Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Compos. Mat., F. L. Matthews, N. C. R. Buskell, J. M. Hodglanson, and J. Morton, eds, Elsevier Applied Science, 1, New York, N.Y., 199–208.
18.
Woolstencroft, D. H., Curtis, A. R., and Haresceugh, R. I.(1981). “A comparison of test techniques used for the evaluation of the unidirectional compressive strength of carbon fiber reinforced plastic.”Compos., 12, 275–280.
19.
Xie, M., and Adams, D. F.(1995). “Effect of loading method on compression testing of composite materials.”J. Compos. Mat., 29(12), 1581–1600.
20.
Xie, M., and Adams, D. F.(1995). “Study of three- and four-point shear testing of unidirectional composite materials.”Compos., 26(9), 653–659.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Composites for Construction
Volume 1 • Issue 4 • November 1997
Pages: 160 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1997
Published in print: Nov 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.