Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) in Artificial, Contaminated Soil Using Ferrous Sulfate Heptahydrate and Sodium Thiosulfate
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 13, Issue 2
Abstract
Due to widespread use in industrial applications, chromium compounds are often considered one of the most serious heavy metal pollutants found at environmental sites. Stabilization/solidification has been studied as a means of immobilizing chromium within a solid matrix. Reduction to a lower valence state is an effective treatment option when coupled with a stabilization/solidification treatment, so that any chromium subsequently leached from the treated soil into groundwater is the less toxic and less mobile trivalent form of chromium. Some studies also indicate that reduction from Cr(VI) to Cr(III) is a necessary preliminary step to effective immobilization. Recent studies have reported the use of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate as an effective reducing agent. However, the possibility of chromium release after such treatment has also been called into question. This technical note presents an alternative to ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, the less-expensive sodium thiosulfate, to reduce hexavalent-chromium contaminated soil and compares the results with the use of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate. The most effective ratio of chemical reagent to hexavalent chromium is reported for the purpose of reducing the chromium to the trivalent form in an artificial, contaminated soil for both reductants. The effectiveness of reduction to trivalent chromium was measured using a modified TCLP test. Based on the results reported in this technical note and possible cost savings over the use of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, further study in the use of sodium thiosulfate for treatment of Cr(VI) contaminated soil is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers wish to thank the university collaboration of Polytechnic University (Brooklyn, N.Y.) and the Università degli Studi della Calabria (Italy) for financial support and Piereantonios Papazoglou and Marilena Papastavros of Stevens Institute of Technology (Hoboken, N.J.) for their assistance with ICP-OES analyses presented in this technical note.
References
Amacher, M. L., and Baker, D. E. (1982). “Redox reactions involving chromium, plutonium, and manganese in soils.” DOE/DP/04515-1, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa.
ATSDR. (2000). Toxicological profile for chromium, Atlanta.
Dermatas, D., Chrysochoou, M., Moon, D. H., Grubb, D. G., Wazne, M., and Christodoulatos, C. (2006). “Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(18), 5786–5792.
Dermatas, D., and Meng, X. (2003). “Utilization of fly ash for stabilization/solidification (S/S) of heavy metal contaminated soils.” Eng. Geol. (Amsterdam), 70(3–4), 377–394.
Evanko, C. R., and Dzombak, D. A. (1997). “Remediation of metals-contaminated soils and groundwater.” Technology Evaluation Rep. No. TE-97-01, Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center, Pittsburgh.
Geelhoed, J. S., Meeussen, J. C. L., and Roe, M. J. (2003). “Chromium remediation or release? Effect of iron (II) sulfate addition on chromium (VI) leaching from columns of chromite ore processing residual.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(14), 3206–3213.
Hillier, S., Roe, M. J., Geelhoed, J. S., Fraser, A. R., Farmer, J. G., and Paterson, E. (2003). “Role of quantitative mineralogical analysis in the investigation of sites contaminated by chromite ore processing residue.” Sci. Total Environ., 308(1–3), 195–210.
Kostarelos, K., Reale, D., Dermatas, D., Rao, E., and Moon, D. H. (2006). “Optimum dose of lime and fly ash for treatment of hexavalent chromium-contaminated soil.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 6(1), 171–189.
Kozuh, N., Stupar, J., and Gorenc, B. (2000). “Reduction and oxidation processes of chromium in soils.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 34(1), 112–119.
Mertz, W. (1974). “Chromium as a dietary essential for man.” Trace elements metabolism, W. G. Hoekstra, J. W. Suttie, K. E. Ganther, and W. Mertz, eds., University Park Press, Baltimore, 185–198.
Rinehart, T. L., Schulze, D. G., Bricka, R. M., Bajt, S., and Blatchley, E. R. (1997). “Chromium leaching vs. oxidation state for a contaminated solidified/stabilized soil.” J. Hazard. Mater., 52(2–3), 213–221.
Rodriguez-Pinero, M., Fernandez Pereira, C., and Ruiz de Elvira Francoy, C. (1998). “Stabilization of a chromium-containing solid waste: Immobilization of hexavalent chromium.” J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 48(11), 1093–1099.
Sang, D. K., Kyeong, S. P., and Gu, M. B. (2002). “Toxicity of hexavalent chromium to daphnia magna: Influence of reduction by ferrous iron.” J. Hazard. Mater., 93(2), 155–164.
Sass, B. M., and Rai, D. (1987). “Solubility of amorphous chromium (III)–iron (III) hydroxide solid solutions.” Inorg. Chem., 26(14), 2228–2231.
The Science Company. (2005). ⟨http://www.sciencecompany.com⟩, ⟨http://www.coscosci.com/sci-exper/crystal_chemchart.htm⟩ (Mar. 30, 2005).
Sedlak, D. L., and Chan, P. G. (1997). “Reduction of hexavalent chromium by ferrous iron.” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 61(11), 2185–2192.
USEPA. (2000). “In situ treatment of soil and groundwater contaminated with chromium.” Technical Resource Guide No. EPA/625/R-00/005, Washington, D.C.
Zayed, A. M., and Terry, N. (2002). “Chromium in the environment: Factors affecting biological remediation.” Plant Soil, 249(1), 139–156.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2009 ASCE.
History
Received: Aug 20, 2007
Accepted: Oct 10, 2008
Published online: Apr 1, 2009
Published in print: Apr 2009
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.