TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 1, 2008

Development of Watershed Management Strategies for the Chiang-Chun River Basin, Taiwan

Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 12, Issue 1

Abstract

The Chiang-Chun River basin is the largest and the most intensively used river basin in Tainan County, Taiwan. Based on the recent water quality analysis, the Chiang-Chun River is heavily polluted. Concern about the deteriorating condition of the river led the Government of Taiwan to amend the relevance legislations and strengthen the enforcement of the discharge regulations to effectively manage the river and control the pollution. Investigation results show that the hog farming is one particularly important activity in the watershed. Most of the untreated hog farm waste is indiscriminately discharged into the river. Moreover, municipal wastewater in the watershed is also discharged into the river without proper treatment. Thus, the hog farm and municipal wastewaters are the major causes of the deterioration of water quality of Chiang-Chun River. Currently, the percent of sewer system connection in the Chiang-Chun River watershed is less than 1%. Investigation results show that the daily wastewater, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and NH3-N loadings into the river are approximately 101,600m3 , 15,800kg , and 3,900kg , respectively. Results also indicate that the domestic wastewater and hog farm waste contribute more than 50% of the daily BOD and NH3-N loads to the river, respectively. In this study, the enhanced stream water quality model was selected as a water quality-planning tool to perform the water quality evaluation and carrying capacity calculation. The calculated BOD and NH3-N carrying capacities were 2,700 and 210kg per day, respectively. A comprehensive strategy for the management of Chiang-Chun River basin has been proposed based on the results from water quality investigation and modeling. The strategy consists of short-term management and improvement measures, long-term structural measures (e.g., sewer system construction to achieve 30% of connection in the basin within 10 years), and land use management and legislation (e.g., river bank management and enforcement of wastewater discharge standards). After the implementation of the proposed measures, the water quality can be significantly improved. The developed watershed management strategies can also be applied to other similar watersheds.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration and Environmental Protection Bureau at Tainan County. Additional thanks to Professor C. G. Wen of National Cheng-Kung University, Professor J. T. Kuo of National Taiwan University, and Professor S. L. Yu of University of Virginia for their assistance throughout this project.

References

Bishwanath, G., and Nandini, B. (2004). “Impact of informal regulation of pollution on water quality in rivers in India.” J. Environ. Manage., 73, 117–130.
Brown, L. C., and Barnwell, T. O. (1987). “The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and user manual.” Rep. No. EPA/600/3-87/007, U.S. EPA, Athens, Ga.
Campolo, M., Andreussi, P., and Soldati, A. (2002). “Water quality control in the River Arno.” Water Res., 36, 2673–2680.
Chen, C. L. (2003). “Application of multimedia modeling on watershed management.” 9th Int. Workshop on Drinking Water Quality Management and Treatment Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, 6-1–6-11.
Chiang, P. C., Kao, C. M., Lin, T. F., and Yan, Y. L. (2000). “Sustainable Taiwan 2011.” Taiwan National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan.
China Technical Consultants, Inc. (CTC). (2000). “Drinking water protection plan in Ping-Tung County.” Rep. to Ping-Tung County Environmental Protection Agency, Ping-Tung County, Taiwan.
Construction and Planning Administration (CPA). (2001). “Study on quantitative criteria of affecting factors.” Delineation guidelines and performance indicators for delineating the source water protection area of water quality and quantity for water supply, Taipei, Taiwan.
Dougherty, M., Dymond, R. L., Grizzard, Jr., T. J., Godrej, A. N., Zipper, C. E., and Randolph, J. (2006). “Quantifying long-term NPS pollutant flux in an urbanizing watershed.” J. Environ. Eng., 132(4), 547–554.
Kao, C. M., Wu, F. C., Chen, K. F., Lin, T. F., Yen, Y. E., and Chiang, P. C. (2003). “Pollutant sources investigation and remedial strategies development for the Kaoping River basin Taiwan.” Water Sci. Technol., 48(7).
Kao, J. J., Chen, W. J., Ju, C. L., Tsai, C. H., and Lin, W. L. (2002). “Analyses of watershed nonpoint source pollution management strategies.” Proc., IWA Third World Water Congress, Melbourne, Australia, April.
Ning, S. K., Jeng, K. Y., and Chang, N. B. (2002). “Evaluation of nonpoint sources pollution impacts by integrated 3S information technologies and GWLF modeling.” Water Sci. Technol., 46, 217–224.
Ning, S. K., Shu, S. Y., Chiang, C. L., Yang, L., and Chang, N. B. (1998). “Water quality analysis in Kaoping River basin.” Proc., 11th Environmental Planning and Management Conference, Tainan, Taiwan, 216–223.
Nunneri, C., and Hofmann, J. (2005). “A participatory approach for integrated river basin management in the Elbe catchment.” Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci., 62(3), 521–537.
Petersen, M. M. (1999). “A natural approach to watershed planning, restoration and management.” Water Sci. Technol., 39(12), 347–352.
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA). (2000). “Industrial wastewater management strategy (II).” EPA-89-U1G1-03-002, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA). (2001). “Investigation of point and nonpoint source pollution in the Chiang-Chun River basin.” EPA-90-G103-02-223, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA). (2002). “Development of nonpoint source pollutant remedial strategy.” EPA-91-G201-01-003, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA). (2004). “Industrial wastewater management strategy (I).” EPA-93-U1G1-03-117, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA). (2005a). “Industrial wastewater management strategy (II).” EPA-94-U1G1-03-002, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (TEPA). (2005b). “Water pollution act.” Taipei, Taiwan.
U.S. EPA Office of Water. (1999). “Protecting sources of drinking water—Selected case studies in watershed management.” Rep. No. EPA 816-R-98-019.
Ute, S. R., and Bruggemann, S. P. (2004). “Aspects of decision support in water management—Example Berlin and Potsdam (Germany). II. Improvement of management strategies.” Water Res., 38, 4085–4092.
Yang, T. C., Kao, C. M., Yeh, T. Y., Lin, C. E., Lai, Y. C. (2006). “Evaluation of NPS pollution in drinking water protection area of Kaoping River watershed.” WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, 5(10), 1131–1137.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 12Issue 1January 2008
Pages: 47 - 52

History

Received: Jun 1, 2005
Accepted: Jun 14, 2007
Published online: Jan 1, 2008
Published in print: Jan 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

M. S. Lee
Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen Univ., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
T. Y. Chen
Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen Univ., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
C. M. Kao
Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Sun Yat-Sen Univ., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J. L. Hung
SGS Taiwan Ltd., Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
C. Y. Chen
Environmental Protection Bureau, Tainan County, Taiwan, Republic of China.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share