TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jan 1, 2008

Disinfection Processes and Stability Refinements to Biosolids Treatment Technologies

Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 12, Issue 1

Abstract

This paper reviews the current United States sewage sludge disinfection regulations and their associated practices; discusses the limitations of the practices; the criteria employed in evaluating a new (innovative or alternative) disinfection process, and notes both some processes recently evaluated and ones evaluated. The United States regulations are designed to protect human health by minimizing the contact of humans with pathogenic microorganisms. Two types of disinfection processes are employed. Processes like pasteurization are employed to reduce pathogens below their analytical detection limits, while processes like anaerobic digestion are combined with requirements for organic matter reduction and access restrictions. Issues with the present disinfection alternatives such as their only being concerned with the presence or absence of certain pathogens like enteric viruses or Ascaris sp. are discussed and remedies suggested. Similarly, several of the current options for measuring vector attractiveness (stability) such as volatile solids reduction are in need of improvement. Work is underway to evaluate bacterial enzymatic activity and biochemical oxygen demand as possible measures of vector attractiveness. Innovative and alternative methods for disinfection are frequently proposed and it is important to understand how the stressors employed by the process contribute to its reduction of pathogenic bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and parasites. For example with an alkaline disinfection process it may be possible to utilize the beneficial effects of time, temperature, pH, chemical agents like ammonia, and pressure. A two-phase and batch thermophilic anaerobic digestion system, however, is able to utilize the benefits of high temperature, high levels of volatile fatty acids, and free ammonia to accomplish a large reduction of pathogens. Vermicomposting and a process that uses a fumigant are currently under evaluation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and briefly discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers appreciate the assistance of Mr. Bob Boston of Biosolids Distribution Services, LLC. in Houston, Tex.; Fred Mussari of BioChem Resources in St. Augustine, Fla.; and Joe Adamik and Bruno Ferran of Infilco Degremont, Inc. in Richmond, Va. The opinions or views expressed in this paper are those of the writers and should not be construed as opinions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.

References

Aitken, et al. (2005). “Inactivation of Ascaris suum and poliovirus in biosolids under thermophilic anaerobic digestion conditions.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 39(15), 5804–5809.
Farrell, et al. (1988). “Influence of feeding procedure on microbial reductions and performance of anaerobic digestion.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 60, 635–644.
Fitzmorris, et al. (2004). “Advances in disinfection in closed alkaline systems.” Proc., Water Environment Federation’s Biosolids Specialty Conf., Salt Lake City.
Huyard, et al. (1999). “Spiking a two phase anaerobic digestion pilot plant: An innovative approach to obtain a PFRP equivalency recommendation.” Proc., Water Environment Federation’s 72nd Annual Conf. and Exposition, New Orleans.
Huyard, et al. (2000). “The two phase anaerobic digestion process: Sludge stabilization and pathogens reduction.” Water Sci. Technol., 42(9), 41–47.
Kato, et al. (2003). “Effect of aerobic and anaerobic digestion on the viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Ascaris suum eggs.” Int. J. Environ. Health Resour., 13, 169–179.
Lotzof and Eisenacher. (2001). “Pathogen destruction at mesophilic temperatures using vermiculture, or, the death of the digester?” Proc., 2001 European Biosolids & Organic Residuals Conf., Workshop and Exhibition on Biosolids and Organic Residuals, CIWEM, Wakefield, U.K.
Reimers, et al. (2006). “Development of the neutralizer process for disinfection and stabilization of municipal wastewater residuals.” Proc., of the Water Environment Federation’s Residuals and Biosolids Management Conf. 2006: Bridging to the Future, Covington, Ky.
Stern and Farrell. (1977). “Sludge disinfection techniques.” Proc., of National Conf. on Composting Municipal Residues and Sludges, Information Transfer, Inc., Rockville, Md., 1117–1122.
USEPA. (1979). “Criteria for classification of solid waste disposal facilities and practices.” Federal Register, 44(179, Sept. 13), 53438–53464.
USEPA. (1989). “Environmental regulations and technology: Control of pathogens in municipal wastewater sludge.” EPA/625-10-89-006, Cincinnati.
USEPA. (1992a). “Environmental regulations and technology: Control of pathogens and vector attraction in sewage sludge.” EPA/625/R-92/013, Cincinnati.
USEPA. (1992b). “Technical support document for reduction of pathogens and vector attraction in sewage sludge.” EPA/822/R-93–004, Washington, D.C.
USEPA. (1993). “40 CFR Parts 257, 403, and 503 (FRO-4203–3): Standards for the use and disposal of sewage, final rule.” Federal Register, 58 (No. 9248, February 19).
USEPA. (1999). “Environmental regulations and technology: Control of pathogens and vector attraction in sewage sludge.” EPA/625/R-92/013, Cincinnati.
USEPA. (2003). “Environmental regulations and technology: Control of pathogens and vector attraction in sewage sludge.” EPA/625/R-92/013, Cincinnati.
Whittington and Johnson. (1985). “Application of 40 CFR Part 257 regulations to pathogen reduction preceding land application of sewage sludge or septic tank pumpings.” Memorandum to EPA Water Division Directors, U.S. EPA Office of Municipal Pollution Control, Washington, D.C.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 12Issue 1January 2008
Pages: 10 - 17

History

Received: Jan 12, 2007
Accepted: May 18, 2007
Published online: Jan 1, 2008
Published in print: Jan 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

James E. Smith Jr.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH 45268.
Rao Y. Surampalli [email protected]
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, P.O. Box 172141, Kansas City, KS 66117 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Robert S. Reimers
School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA 70112-2824.
R. D. Tyagi
INRS-ETE, Univ. of Quebec, Quebec, Canada G1K 4Y9.
Bindu N. Lohani
Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share