On-Site Treatment of Septic Tank Effluent by Using a Soil Adsorption System
Publication: Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 11, Issue 3
Abstract
A septic tank and soil absorption system (SAS) is a simple means of treating domestic wastewater using the filtration, sedimentation, chemical absorption, and biological characteristics of soil. Data obtained from countries, such as the United States and Australia, where on-site wastewater treatment is common, suggests that SAS have become a main application for on-site treatment. In this research, the performance of SAS was investigated through an outdoor pilot study and two laboratory tank studies. The treatment capacity of the outdoor pilot plant was , and used alternating anaerobic and aerobic units. The objective of the pilot study was to verify the occurrence of nitrification and denitrification in the system. In the tank study, the first setup utilized capillary and siphonage mechanisms to change wastewater distribution within the filter bed. The effect of wastewater distribution on hydraulic loading, pollutant removal, and system reliability were then investigated. In the second setup, three different media (sand, gravel, and soil) were used to treat typical domestic wastewater to assess their removal of nitrogen and phosphorus-rich pollutants (including ammonia, nitrate, and TP). Last, three different hydraulic loadings were examined to investigate the maximum possible treatment loading. The pilot scale SAS experimental results show that through a batch system of anaerobic and aerobic units, the SAS was effective in removing nitrogen by nitrification and denitrification. In the pilot study, ammonia decreased by 76.0%, nitrate increased by 91.8%, and the sum of ammonia and nitrate decreased by 51.3%. Results from the water distribution test show that a minimum grain size of should be used for the filter bed medium when capillary layers are used to distribute water. The hydraulic loading can be up to for a well-constructed capillary and siphonage trench. Results from the test with different filter media show that sand is the best of the three media tested in removing nitrogen and phosphorus. For typical nitrogen and phosphorus concentration of domestic wastewater, the influent concentration had little effect on the rate of reduction when sand and gravel were used. For hydraulic loading, under the maximum loading chosen in this experiment, ammonia nitrogen and phosphorus removal of greater than 90% still could be achieved for sand and soil. We therefore believe that hydraulic loading in SAS can be further increased to reduce the treatment site area.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to thank the MWH Taiwan Branch Office and National Science Council (UNSPECIFIEDNSC 94-2211-E-027-007) for financially supporting this research.
References
Baveye, P., Vandevivere, P., Hoyle, B. L., DeLeo, P. C., and de Lozada, D. S. (1998). “Environmental impact and mechanisms of the biological clogging of saturated soils and aquifer materials.” Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 28, 123–191.
Beal, C. D., Gardner, E. A., and Menzies, N. W. (2005). “Process, performance and pollution potential: A review of septic tank–soil absorption systems.” Austral. J. Soil Res., 43, 781–802.
Beal, C. D., Gardner, E. A., Vieritz, A. M., and Menzies, N. W. (2004). “The role of the biomat in the sustainable performance of soil absorption systems in Australia: A review.” Proc., 10th National Symp. on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, K. R. Mankin, ed., ASAE, St Joseph, Mich., 241–248.
Bouma, J. (1975). “Unsaturated flow during soil treatment of septic tank effluent.” J. Envir. Engrg. Div., 101(10), 967–983.
Brouwer, J., Willatt, S. T., and van der Graaff, R. (1979). “The hydrology of onsite septic tank effluent disposal on a yellow duplex soil.” Hydrology and Water Resources Symp., IEAust, ACT, Perth.
Council for Economic Planning and Development (CEPD). (2003). “Challenge 2008—National Development Plan content.” Executive Yuan, Taiwan, 236–237.
Dawes, L., and Goonetilleke, A. (2001). “Importance of site characteristics in designing effluent disposal areas.” Proc., Onsite ’01 Conf., Lanfax Laboratories, Univ. of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia, 133–140.
EPRI. (2000). “National research needs conference proceedings: Risk based decision making for onsite wastewater treatment.” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project No. 2001 1101446, EPRI, Palo Alto, Calif.
Geary, P. (1994). “Soil survey and the design of wastewater disposal systems.” J. Soil Water Conservat., 7, 16–23.
Huntzinger, B. D. N., and McCray, J. E. (2003). “Numerical modeling of unsaturated flow in wastewater soil absorption systems.” Ground Water Monit. Rem., 23, 64–71.
Kristiansen, R. (1981). “Sand-filter trenches for purification of septic tank effluent: I. The clogging mechanism and soil physical environment.” J. Environ. Qual., 10, 353–357.
O’Keefe, N. (2001). “Accreditation of onsite wastewater treatment systems—Installation and maintenance personnel.” Proc., Onsite ’01 Conf., Lanfax Laboratories, Univ. of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia, 295–299.
Otis, R. J. (1984). “Soil clogging: Mechanisms and control.” Onsite Wastewater Treatment: Proc., 4th National Symp. on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, ASAE, St Joseph, Mich., 238–251.
Shimatani, Y., Hosomi, M., and Nakamura, K. (2003). Water quality improvement by ecotechnology, Soft Science, Inc., Tokyo, 171–182 (in Japanese).
Siegrist, R., and Boyle, W. C. (1987). “Wastewater-induced soil clogging development.” J. Environ. Eng., 113(3), 550–566.
Siegrist, R., Smed-Hildmann, R., Filip, Z. K., and Jenssen, P. D. (1991). “Humic substances formation during wastewater infiltration.” Proc., 6th National Symp. on Individual and Small Community Sewage Systems, ASAE, St Joseph, Mich., 223–232.
Strecker, E., Urbonas, B., Quigley, M., Howell, J., and Hesse, T. (2002). “Urban stormwater BMP performance monitoring.” EPA-821-B-02-001, USEPA and ASCE, Washington, D.C., 40–42.
Tyler, E. J., and Converse, J. C. (1994). “Soil acceptance of onsite wastewater as affected by soil morphology and wastewater quality.” Proc., 7th National Symp. on Individual and Small Community Sewage, ASAE, St Joseph, Mich., 185–194.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1993). “Guidance specifying management measures for sources of nonpoint pollution in coastal waters.” EPA840-B-92-002, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2002). Onsite wastewater treatment systems manual, Chaps. 1 and 4, U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C., 6–34.
Vesilind, P. A. (2003). Wastewater treatment plant design, Chap. 8, Water Environment Federation, Va., 7–19.
Wilhelm, S. R., Schiff, S. L., and Robertson, W. D. (1994). “Chemical fate and transport in a domestic septic system: Unsaturated and saturated zone geochemistry.” Envir. Toxicol. Chem., 13, 193–223.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management
Volume 11 • Issue 3 • July 2007
Pages: 197 - 206
Copyright
© 2007 ASCE.
History
Received: Jan 18, 2007
Accepted: Jan 25, 2007
Published online: Jul 1, 2007
Published in print: Jul 2007
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.